Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 2/27/2017 7:02 PM, juan wrote: On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:49:08 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: And by this standard of what constitutes an invention, your 'standard' is deranged nonsense. You could not buy a useful lightbulb until Swan and Edison started

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:49:08 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: > > And by this standard of what constitutes an invention, your 'standard' is deranged nonsense. You are fully out of touch with reality. Go suck some black cock. We all know that's your

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 2/27/2017 2:39 PM, juan wrote: On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:28:09 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: On 2/27/2017 12:49 PM, juan wrote: On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:19:00 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: the fact is that Edison and Swan were first, and Hiram

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:28:09 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: > On 2/27/2017 12:49 PM, juan wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:19:00 +1000 > > "James A. Donald" wrote: > > > > > >> the fact is that Edison and Swan were first, and Hiram Maxim > >> (or

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 2/27/2017 12:49 PM, juan wrote: On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:19:00 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: the fact is that Edison and Swan were first, and Hiram Maxim (or Latimer) was second. no, that is not a fact - it's just a stupid lie coming from a right wing

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:19:00 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: > the fact is that Edison and Swan were first, and Hiram Maxim > (or Latimer) was second. no, that is not a fact - it's just a stupid lie coming from a right wing asshole (you) . stop lying,

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

"James A. Donald" wrote: 1. Edison and Swan, the owners of the Edison & Swan United Electric Light Company, did invent the light bulb, On 2/27/2017 10:15 AM, juan wrote: no they didn't Oh? Who did then? On 2/27/2017 11:27 AM, Razer wrote: Latimer received a

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

Here is material and links relavant to the original subject on why bans are false to some of the reasons what the US is actually part of being... https://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/5w6vm8/second_amendment_does_not_cover_weapons_of_war_us/ It's all over reddit... a bunch of irresponsible

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 05:05:00PM -0800, Razer wrote: > Resources are finite. This may be so in an absolute sense, as in "the amount of energy coming out of our sun is finite, and the amount of energy we can tap from the electrons and energy composing/constituting matter" is finite, BUT, just

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 02/26/2017 05:19 PM, James A. Donald wrote: > "James A. Donald" wrote: >>> 1. Edison and Swan, the owners of the Edison & Swan United Electric >>> Light Company, did invent the light bulb, > > On 2/27/2017 10:15 AM, juan wrote: >> no they didn't > > Oh? > > Who did

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

"James A. Donald" wrote: 1. Edison and Swan, the owners of the Edison & Swan United Electric Light Company, did invent the light bulb, On 2/27/2017 10:15 AM, juan wrote: no they didn't Oh? Who did then? Invented in the Soviet Union, no doubt, like everything

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 02/26/2017 03:57 PM, James A. Donald wrote: > On 2/27/2017 9:12 AM, juan wrote: >> edison didn't invent the light bulb - despite what right wing >> ignorant americans believe. > > > 1. Edison and Swan, the owners of the Edison & Swan United Electric > Light Company, did invent the

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:57:04 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: > On 2/27/2017 9:12 AM, juan wrote: > > edison didn't invent the light bulb - despite what right > > wing ignorant americans believe. > > > 1. Edison and Swan, the owners of the Edison & Swan United Electric

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

"James A. Donald" wrote: Almost every technological advance that is brought to the masses comes from someone like Rockefeller, On 2/27/2017 6:44 AM, juan wrote: you a stupid liar and an anti-libertarian piece of shit. Too bad you're still alive. You

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:57:04 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: > On 2/27/2017 9:12 AM, juan wrote: > > edison didn't invent the light bulb - despite what right > > wing ignorant americans believe. > > > 1. Edison and Swan, the owners of the Edison & Swan United Electric

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 2/27/2017 9:12 AM, juan wrote: edison didn't invent the light bulb - despite what right wing ignorant americans believe. 1. Edison and Swan, the owners of the Edison & Swan United Electric Light Company, did invent the light bulb, and did not waste too much time arguing

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 14:05:18 -0800 Razer wrote: > On 2017-02-26 12:18, James A. Donald wrote: > > On 2/26/2017 5:31 PM, juan wrote: > >>the price of commodities don't go down thanks to scumbags > >> like rockefeller. Stop lying. > > > > Almost every technological advance

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 2017-02-26 12:18, James A. Donald wrote: On 2/26/2017 5:31 PM, juan wrote: the price of commodities don't go down thanks to scumbags like rockefeller. Stop lying. Almost every technological advance that is brought to the masses comes from someone like Rockefeller I

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 06:18:24 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: > On 2/26/2017 5:31 PM, juan wrote: > > the price of commodities don't go down thanks to scumbags > > like rockefeller. Stop lying. > > Almost every technological advance that is brought to the masses > comes

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:14:59 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: > In the case of Standard Oil, we see technological advance let's assume, for argument's sake, that there was some 'technological advance' > driven by a > rich capitalist

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

In the case of Standard Oil, we see technological advance driven by a rich capitalist radically reducing the cost of fuel, as in the standard Ayn Rand account of technological progress, industrialization, and economic development. We don't see any obvious reduction in the cost of fuel from

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 14:26:49 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: > "James A. Donald" wrote: > >> Who is leftists favorite example of a real life evil capitalist? > >> > >> John D Rockefeller of Standard Oil, who reduced the cost of petrol > > On 2/25/2017

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

"James A. Donald" wrote: Who is leftists favorite example of a real life evil capitalist? John D Rockefeller of Standard Oil, who reduced the cost of petrol On 2/25/2017 10:56 AM, juan wrote: He didn't reduce the cost of oil. He reduced the cost of what goes

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

From: Ben Tasker On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 1:37 PM, jim bell wrote: Court rules assault weapons are not protected under Constitution http://dailym.ai/2mmUuqG via http://dailym.ai/android I'm no fan of the US's view on firearms, but this makes no

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

From: Marina Brown On 02/23/2017 08:13 PM, Mirimir wrote: > On 02/23/2017 05:40 PM, Razer wrote: >> >> >> On 02/23/2017 01:04 PM, Mirimir wrote: >>> On 02/23/2017 08:38 AM, Razer wrote: On 02/23/2017 05:37 AM, jim bell wrote: > Court rules assault

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 2/24/17, James A. Donald wrote: > Traditional muskets are big, clumsy, and kick like a horse, but they > blow great big holes in people. Bigger holes, more assured death. > Remember, they rendered armor irrelevant Armor piercing is relavant. > It is the famous AK-47

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:26:09 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 09:46:21 +1000 > "James A. Donald" wrote: > >> As Ayn Rand told us, wealth is created by talented businessmen. > > On 2/25/2017 9:57 AM, juan wrote: > > rand was an

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 09:46:21 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: As Ayn Rand told us, wealth is created by talented businessmen. On 2/25/2017 9:57 AM, juan wrote: rand was an incredibly stupid cunt, Not to mention, she was morally despicable. That's why she

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 2/24/2017 1:20 PM, Razer wrote: On 02/23/2017 07:15 PM, Marina Brown misquoted Jim... I wrote the bit about outrunning a musketball...Yeah well perhaps I was jesting. But what might happen if the ball hit a solid object, or thick chopped pressed wool (imagine a peacoat on steroids) with a

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 09:46:21 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: > On 2/24/2017 12:37 PM, John Newman wrote: > > The USA built its prosperity on the ashes of Europe and Asia, > > and now it's all a big con to keep the rich man rich. > > As Ayn Rand told us, wealth is created by

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 2/24/2017 12:37 PM, John Newman wrote: The USA built its prosperity on the ashes of Europe and Asia, and now it's all a big con to keep the rich man rich. As Ayn Rand told us, wealth is created by talented businessmen. If you doubt it, observe China Compare China before 1980 with China

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Feb 23, 2017, at 7:55 PM, James A. Donald wrote: Law, legality, and order is not judges getting their way. Law, legality, and order is a well armed, well disciplined, well trained man in a neat uniform enforcing explicit formal officially stated rules in obedience to

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 02/24/2017 01:19 AM, John Newman wrote: On Feb 23, 2017, at 11:56 PM, Razer wrote: On 02/23/2017 08:44 PM, juan wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 19:24:03 -0700 Mirimir wrote: It was WWII that led to economic prosperity in the US. The war effort built

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

> On Feb 23, 2017, at 11:56 PM, Razer wrote: > > > >> On 02/23/2017 08:44 PM, juan wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 19:24:03 -0700 >> Mirimir wrote: >> >> >>> It was WWII that led to economic prosperity in the US. The war effort >>> built up industry.

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 01:21:58AM -0500, grarpamp wrote: > The US has gone paranoid expeditionary since decades, > that's very hard psycological problem to recover from. > Often outcome is spiral till weak and ultimately dead. > to need defended against. Yet know, giving up powerful tools of

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

The US has gone paranoid expeditionary since decades, that's very hard psycological problem to recover from. Often outcome is spiral till weak and ultimately dead. Armed revolutions are possible if needed. The naysayers have relic notions of quaint little firing lines in pretty colors with cannon

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 02/23/2017 08:44 PM, juan wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 19:24:03 -0700 Mirimir wrote: It was WWII that led to economic prosperity in the US. The war effort built up industry. Europe and Asia were in ruins. The sense of shared sacrifice encouraged hard work, and more

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 19:24:03 -0700 Mirimir wrote: > > It was WWII that led to economic prosperity in the US. The war effort > built up industry. Europe and Asia were in ruins. The sense of shared > sacrifice encouraged hard work, and more equity. There were good >

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 02/23/2017 07:15 PM, Marina Brown misquoted Jim... I wrote the bit about outrunning a musketball...Yeah well perhaps I was jesting. But what might happen if the ball hit a solid object, or thick chopped pressed wool (imagine a peacoat on steroids) with a bunch of undergarments are two

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 02/23/2017 08:13 PM, Mirimir wrote: > On 02/23/2017 05:40 PM, Razer wrote: >> >> >> On 02/23/2017 01:04 PM, Mirimir wrote: >>> On 02/23/2017 08:38 AM, Razer wrote: On 02/23/2017 05:37 AM, jim bell wrote: > Court rules assault weapons are not protected under >

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 08:55:40PM -0500, John Newman wrote: > > > On Feb 23, 2017, at 7:55 PM, James A. Donald wrote: > > > >> On 2/24/2017 10:40 AM, Razer wrote: > >> ROTF! To be a revolution you need an IDEOLOGY. > >> > >> Greed is NOT an Ideology. > > > > Liberty under

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

> On Feb 23, 2017, at 9:24 PM, Mirimir wrote: > >> On 02/23/2017 06:22 PM, Razer wrote: >> >> >>> On 02/23/2017 05:13 PM, Mirimir wrote: >>> >>> Well, maybe electing Trump wasn't a revolution, any more than electing >>> Obama was. But Trump and his people seem even

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 02/23/2017 06:22 PM, Razer wrote: > > > On 02/23/2017 05:13 PM, Mirimir wrote: > >> Well, maybe electing Trump wasn't a revolution, any more than electing >> Obama was. But Trump and his people seem even crazier than W and his >> minders. So yes, bad shit could go down ;) > > I'm still

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

> On Feb 23, 2017, at 7:55 PM, James A. Donald wrote: > >> On 2/24/2017 10:40 AM, Razer wrote: >> ROTF! To be a revolution you need an IDEOLOGY. >> >> Greed is NOT an Ideology. > > Liberty under law, private property, freedom of contract, and freedom of > association is

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 02/23/2017 05:13 PM, Mirimir wrote: Well, maybe electing Trump wasn't a revolution, any more than electing Obama was. But Trump and his people seem even crazier than W and his minders. So yes, bad shit could go down ;) I'm still trying to figure out how many people voted for him, to

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 02/23/2017 05:40 PM, Razer wrote: > > > On 02/23/2017 01:04 PM, Mirimir wrote: >> On 02/23/2017 08:38 AM, Razer wrote: >>> >>> On 02/23/2017 05:37 AM, jim bell wrote: Court rules assault weapons are not protected under Constitutionhttp://dailym.ai/2mmUuqG via >>> They aren't. You

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 2/24/2017 10:40 AM, Razer wrote: ROTF! To be a revolution you need an IDEOLOGY. Greed is NOT an Ideology. Liberty under law, private property, freedom of contract, and freedom of association is an ideology. Notice that we have a problem that our judges are lawless. At some point, to

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

Judicial behavior is obviously criminal, illegal, and immoral. Trump is going to have many long confrontations with the judges during which this becomes increasingly obvious to everyone, and then he is going to blow the judges off. Possibly as early as October this year, but possibly after

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 02/23/2017 01:04 PM, Mirimir wrote: On 02/23/2017 08:38 AM, Razer wrote: On 02/23/2017 05:37 AM, jim bell wrote: Court rules assault weapons are not protected under Constitutionhttp://dailym.ai/2mmUuqG via They aren't. You know why? When the Second Amendment was written, at 50 yards or

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 02/23/2017 08:38 AM, Razer wrote: > > > On 02/23/2017 05:37 AM, jim bell wrote: >> Court rules assault weapons are not protected under >> Constitutionhttp://dailym.ai/2mmUuqG via > > They aren't. You know why? When the Second Amendment was written, at 50 > yards or so, you could literally

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Razer wrote: > > On 02/23/2017 05:37 AM, jim bell wrote: > > Court rules assault weapons are not protected under Constitution > http://dailym.ai/2mmUuqG via > > > They aren't. You know why? When the Second Amendment was written, at 50 > yards or

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On 02/23/2017 05:37 AM, jim bell wrote: Court rules assault weapons are not protected under Constitutionhttp://dailym.ai/2mmUuqG via They aren't. You know why? When the Second Amendment was written, at 50 yards or so, you could literally outrun a musketball. If it didn't bounce off your

Re: 10 judges are nuts.

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 1:37 PM, jim bell wrote: > Court rules assault weapons are not protected under Constitution > http://dailym.ai/2mmUuqG via http://dailym.ai/android > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > > I'm

10 judges are nuts.

Court rules assault weapons are not protected under Constitution http://dailym.ai/2mmUuqG via http://dailym.ai/android Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android