On indulgence - lets put to *another* side the quality of activism ledger.
Lets open the books on anti-social criminality.
As you argued in your AP essay it would not be ' Wild in the Streets ' chaos. I
take that to mean you distinguish between anarchism and anti-social
criminality.
Like
On Thursday, July 15, 2021, 05:26:22 PM PDT, professor rat
wrote:
>JIM BELL asks...
:Where was the discussion where people concluded that Assange was a "fascist"?
>Julian Assange recognised that the language of what amounted to the WikiLeaks
>Manifesto might appear a little “overblown”.
Put to one side for the moment whether or not Assmange is fascist or not.
Does his journalism or activism or ' cypherpunk revolution' , whatever justify
our solidarity and support?
I would say, " No' , based on his record. He himself washed his hands of
everything up to mid-2013 anyway.
( "
JIM BELL asks...
Where was the discussion where people concluded that Assange was a "fascist"?
Julian Assange recognised that the language of what amounted to the WikiLeaks
Manifesto might appear a little “overblown”. He recognised that it had about it
too much the flavour of “anarchy”. But
On Wednesday, July 14, 2021, 06:51:33 AM PDT, professor rat
wrote:
>The Jim Bell Project operating in US jurisdiction is entirely in keeping with
>the last part of
>the AP essay - the part all media commentary ignores completely. No reason
to cast any
>doubt on Jims bona fides
The Jim Bell Project operating in US jurisdiction is entirely in keeping with
the last part of
the AP essay - the part all media commentary ignores completely. No reason to
cast any
doubt on Jims bona fides there. The problem with him now though is his
support for a
known fascist -
