Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-25 Thread jim bell
I notice that you two haven't responded to what I have said, below.  This makes me question whether you were really serious about finding out more of the "FBI agents following" and the "library".   Or, maybe you've simply realized that the only way to proceed with this inquiry is to disclose

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-13 Thread jim bell
On Tuesday, November 12, 2019, 11:43:59 PM PST, grarpamp wrote: On 11/13/19, jim bell wrote: >>  What months  of emails are missing?  By my recollection, nearly all >> postings in the 1995 archive file end February 14, 1995, and resume about > >July 11, 1995.  (there are a very few during

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-12 Thread grarpamp
On 11/13/19, jim bell wrote: > What months of emails are missing? By my recollection, nearly all > postings in the 1995 archive file end February 14, 1995, and resume about > July 11, 1995. (there are a very few during this period, though.) I think > this simulates a 'data loss'. Not

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-12 Thread jim bell
What months  of emails are missing?  By my recollection, nearly all postings in the 1995 archive file end February 14, 1995, and resume about July 11, 1995.  (there are a very few during this period, though.)   I think this simulates a 'data loss'.But, very few postings mentioning "Jim Bell",

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-12 Thread grarpamp
A fuller copy that subscribed to Toad floated here, it's in a shit format. So people should always feel free to post / send / link whatever they have. Anyway, in it, Jim's '/(jim|james).*bell/i' first... - msg is Date: Tue, 07 Nov 1995 16:10:53 -0800 - mention of /ass?ass?inn?ation/i is Date:

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-10 Thread jim bell
Ah, okay.               Jim Bell On Sunday, November 10, 2019, 10:10:32 AM PST, grarpamp wrote: On 11/9/19, jim bell wrote: >  I'm trying to understand what you are saying, here... Yahoogroups cpunks copy is missing messages. To find what's missing from yahoo, and possibly why,

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-10 Thread grarpamp
On 11/9/19, jim bell wrote: > I'm trying to understand what you are saying, here... Yahoogroups cpunks copy is missing messages. To find what's missing from yahoo, and possibly why, someone has to look at other archives between the indicated msg-id's to see if they show up.

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-09 Thread jim bell
The idea that government agents can misuse their authority to harass people and illegally obtain benefit, is obvious.  It happened to me.See this material:  https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/11/07/digenova_fisa_report_will_ruin_careers_people_are_going_to_be_indicted.html      

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-09 Thread jim bell
I'm trying to understand what you are saying, here...          Jim Bell On Friday, November 8, 2019, 07:04:31 PM PST, grarpamp wrote: The yahoo set has gaps that may indicate selective importation or subsequent takedown events. Someone with more time should load up other sources for 97

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-08 Thread grarpamp
The yahoo set has gaps that may indicate selective importation or subsequent takedown events. Someone with more time should load up other sources for 97 and see what msgs fell between these msgids... --- missing 1 msg here --- <5zhr1d53w1...@bwalk.dm.com> <199702180330.taa21...@toad.com>

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-08 Thread jim bell
Okay, I understand,  But that doesn't mean that I am convinced that there does not remain a problem. Your questions did not resolve the issues you raised, in part because those questions weren't well-framed, and appeared to be based on false 'facts' that I was fully capable of and willing to

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-05 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 05:26:34PM +, jim bell wrote: > On Tuesday, November 5, 2019, 04:11:33 AM PST, John Newman > wrote: > > On November 5, 2019 7:44:48 AM UTC, grarpamp wrote: > >> if anyone > >> reading this has their own copies of the 1990s archives, I'd love to > >have > >> them.

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-05 Thread Tom Busby
The count was performed by me programmatically. That count represents all the emails associated with that email address that are present in the venona raw archives. On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 21:39, jim bell wrote: > > I have another question: on the CP archive page >

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-05 Thread jim bell
I have another question:  on the CP archive page  https://mailing-list-archive.cryptoanarchy.wiki/authors/notable/     , it has an option to show "Notable Authors".  Finding my own listing, it states: Jim Bell - jim bell  - 1118 posts - jimb...@pacifier.com (Jim Bell) - 57 posts

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-05 Thread jim bell
On Tuesday, November 5, 2019, 07:39:53 AM PST, John Young wrote: >This a good suggestion. NSA most likely to have archived the whole shebang, perhaps still does. At this point, would the Feds even want to admit to running their operation in a manner so incompetently that they FAILED to

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-05 Thread jim bell
On Tuesday, November 5, 2019, 04:11:33 AM PST, John Newman wrote: On November 5, 2019 7:44:48 AM UTC, grarpamp wrote: >> if anyone >> reading this has their own copies of the 1990s archives, I'd love to >have >> them. I can't make any promises about when I'll be able to work on >>

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-05 Thread Razer
On November 5, 2019 4:11:08 AM PST, John Newman wrote: >Maybe the feds have an archive we can FOIA out of them ;) > +1 http://getprsm.com/ has it. Rr Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-05 Thread John Young
This a good suggestion. NSA most likely to have archived the whole shebang, perhaps still does. Related, the "NSA Bot" which began siphoning Cryptome daily in 1996: https://cryptome.org/jya/nsa-bot.htm At 07:11 AM 11/5/2019, you wrote: Maybe the feds have an archive we can FOIA out of them

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-05 Thread John Newman
On November 5, 2019 7:44:48 AM UTC, grarpamp wrote: >> if anyone >> reading this has their own copies of the 1990s archives, I'd love to >have >> them. I can't make any promises about when I'll be able to work on >> processing them, but rest assured I will take great care of those >archive >>

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-04 Thread grarpamp
> if anyone > reading this has their own copies of the 1990s archives, I'd love to have > them. I can't make any promises about when I'll be able to work on > processing them, but rest assured I will take great care of those archive > files Similarly, whatever is received here sits pending header

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-04 Thread Tom Busby
I hear you. We just need more people to come forward with their own archives of the 90s so we can merge them. That's the most sensible solution (and the only one I can think of). Currently, the only game in town seems to be Ryan Lackey's archive. I'm very keen to get hold of other archives of

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-04 Thread jim bell
Thank you for your reply, I will answer inline:  Jim Bell On Monday, November 4, 2019, 01:17:58 PM PST, Tom Busby wrote: >Hi to all in general and Jim in particular, >I don't check the list all that often at the moment, I decided to do a keyword >search after I saw your disqus

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-04 Thread Tom Busby
Hi to all in general and Jim in particular, I don't check the list all that often at the moment, I decided to do a keyword search after I saw your disqus comment. It's good to hear from you, I'm a fan of Assassination Politics. It's a thought provoking work describing a dangerous idea of the kind

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-02 Thread jim bell
On Saturday, November 2, 2019, 08:31:18 PM PDT, Zenaan Harkness wrote: On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 12:18:15AM -0300, Punk - Stasi 2.0 wrote: > >On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 13:32:19 +1100 > >Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > >> > Folks around here have been trying REALLY hard to stay pleasant, and > >>

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-02 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 04:41:48AM +, jim bell wrote: > On Saturday, November 2, 2019, 07:32:44 PM PDT, Zenaan Harkness > wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 10:31:09PM +, jim bell wrote: > > No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus. > > Dear Mr. Busby, > > On the Cypherpunks Archive

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-02 Thread jim bell
On Saturday, November 2, 2019, 07:32:44 PM PDT, Zenaan Harkness wrote: On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 10:31:09PM +, jim bell wrote: > No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus. > Dear Mr. Busby, > On the Cypherpunks Archive web page,  >

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-02 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 12:18:15AM -0300, Punk - Stasi 2.0 wrote: > On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 13:32:19 +1100 > Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > > > Folks around here have been trying REALLY hard to stay pleasant, and > > respectful, and constructive, towards you specifically. > > > This includes everyone

Re: No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus.

2019-11-02 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 10:31:09PM +, jim bell wrote: > No, Mr. Busby, there is a Santa Claus. > Dear Mr. Busby, > On the Cypherpunks Archive web page,  > https://cryptoanarchy.wiki/blog/2018/07/05/the-cypherpunks-mailing-list-archives-must-be-preserved.html >    , you said: > Are you