On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 18:58:52 -0400
grarpamp wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:44 PM, juan wrote:
> > , as far as posting goes.
>
> Adding qualifiers changes the question.
DUDE - quoting the end of a sentence is retarded. What are you
On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 13:07:15 +1100
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 09:09:54PM -0300, Juan wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 19:57:40 -0400
> > grarpamp wrote:
> >
> > > What are your suggestions as to recourse?
> >
> > No point in
On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 21:12:48 -0400
grarpamp wrote:
me>> also take into account that the owner of the list can censor
>
> It's theirs to do, and voluntary, so fork and unsub.
>
You correctly notice they are censors, you called them
hypocrites and you
On 3/23/2018 2:00 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:24:24PM +1000, jam...@echeque.com wrote:
The original CPU design was purchased from the US, but a variety of chip
makers have been improving on the design in a variety of ways, so it is not
US cloned, but is US descended -
On 3/25/2018 8:07 AM, juan wrote:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 07:48:06 +1000
jam...@echeque.com wrote:
On 3/23/2018 2:00 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:24:24PM +1000, jam...@echeque.com wrote:
The original CPU design was purchased from the US, but a variety
of chip makers have
On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 09:10:36 +1000
jam...@echeque.com wrote:
> > Point being, it seems hard, even for the chinese govt, to
> > know for sure that the system isn't backdoored by many of the
> > western scum 'players' in the 'industry'.
>
> Again, Orange Pi is all Chinese manufacture,
What are your suggestions as to recourse?
Original message From: Steven Schear
Date: 3/24/18 5:09 PM (GMT-08:00) To: cypherpunks
Subject: Re: From sand to silicon chips, openly
Its one thing to have open CPUs but what about the rest of the hardware you
need
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 07:54:45PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > ...
>
> Do not thread me into whatever crap you're
> doing with your Russia, Jew, Nazi and whatever
> other garbage you constantly post.
>
> Nor is such
Original message From: Tumblr Date:
3/23/18 4:27 PM (GMT-08:00) To: RussianStooge@kremlin.commieSubject: Update
on Russian-linked activity on Tumblr
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:44 PM, juan wrote:
> , as far as posting goes.
Adding qualifiers changes the question.
> recourse against scum like
> metzger or any other censor is...what...use a FREE channel?
What is your suggested recourse?
Murder? Love? Talk? Tort? Subterfuge?
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 4:53 PM, juan wrote:
>> It's theirs to do, and voluntary, so fork and unsub.
> 'own' the list ...and... the people in it
These two are independant here, as they are free to voluntarily
disembark from the owner without recourse and to
On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 18:31:51 -0400
grarpamp wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 4:53 PM, juan wrote:
> >> It's theirs to do, and voluntary, so fork and unsub.
>
> > 'own' the list ...and... the people in it
>
> These two are independant here,
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> ...
Do not thread me into whatever crap you're
doing with your Russia, Jew, Nazi and whatever
other garbage you constantly post.
Nor is such crap necessary to test or prove
whatever about censorship all the time,
and
Its one thing to have open CPUs but what about the rest of the hardware you
need to build actual products? The best answers today are probably only be
found in Shenzhen.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SGJ5cZnoodY
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018, 9:13 AM Steven Schear wrote:
>
On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 19:57:40 -0400
grarpamp wrote:
> What are your suggestions as to recourse?
No point in talking to people who do not listen. LIKE YOU.
So when you let me know that you actually read and thought
abpit what I wrote to you, I might
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 09:09:54PM -0300, Juan wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 19:57:40 -0400
> grarpamp wrote:
>
> > What are your suggestions as to recourse?
>
> No point in talking to people who do not listen. LIKE YOU.
>
> So when you let me know that you
My bad Juan,
Im fucked.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018, 11:17 PM juan wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 13:07:15 +1100
> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 09:09:54PM -0300, Juan wrote:
> > > On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 19:57:40 -0400
> > > grarpamp
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:17:01AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 04:54:37PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> > https://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/central-banker/summer-2013/from-bailouts-to-bailins-will-the-singlepointofentry-concept-end-too-big-to-fail
>
> TLDR seems to
On 3/25/2018 9:34 AM, juan wrote:
Regardless, as far as I understand it, the problem is not
speculative execution per se, but shitty implementations
that don't take security into account. Because the engineers
responsible for them are incompetent or/and corrupt.
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 02:09:55PM +1000, jam...@echeque.com wrote:
> On 3/25/2018 9:34 AM, juan wrote:
> > Regardless, as far as I understand it, the problem is not
> > speculative execution per se, but shitty implementations
> > that don't take security into account. Because the
On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 07:48:06 +1000
jam...@echeque.com wrote:
> On 3/23/2018 2:00 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:24:24PM +1000, jam...@echeque.com wrote:
> >> The original CPU design was purchased from the US, but a variety
> >> of chip makers have been improving on the
>> (hopefully it's legal, but I won't give the URL in case it isn't).
> absurd copyright laws
>> didn't want to mistakenly drop our moderator into it.
Here are some illegal URL's... brought to you in part
by the laws of crypto munitions and free speech...
http://uj3wazyk5u4hnvtk.onion/
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 09:22:09PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/86jm48/maltas_prime_minister_is_personally_welcoming/
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/86jhge/binance_is_moving_to_malta_after_outcome_of_talks/
>
>
>
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 07:06:05PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 6:06 PM, wrote:
> > Posting of your message titled "Re: [Cryptography] Blockchain
> > currencies: The Death of 1000 Cuts"
> >
> > Posting of your message titled "Cryptonomics,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 09:12:48PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> jj;
> >priceless. But take into account that the 'cryptography'
> >mailing list is the True Heir to the cpunks mailing list, john
> >gilmore said so, IIRC.
>
> What, lol.
>
> > also take into account that
26 matches
Mail list logo