Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread John Newman
On August 15, 2018 2:31:10 AM CDT, grarpamp wrote: >There are some very wealthy early cryptocurrency anarcho OGs. >Given a working crypto prediction market, them dropping a million for a >solid prediction on when some cantalope will pop... a fun game for >them. >Any extra kicked in by the

Documentary: The Art Of Dissent

2018-08-15 Thread grarpamp
https://www.npr.org/2018/08/04/635654200/ai-wei-weis-beijing-studio-destroyed-by-chinese-authorities https://www.bbc.com/news/video_and_audio/headlines/45073421/ai-weiwei-fans-mourn-as-beijing-studio-destroyed

Censorship on cypherpunks ? Re: [Cryptography] Krugman blockchain currency skepticism

2018-08-15 Thread Greg Newby
Is what's below complaining about the cypherpunks list? I'm the "moderator" but never moderate anything. When mailman's auto-defenses is triggered, I need to go in and twiddle it to allow the message. For message below, mailman held the message because cypherpu...@cpunks.org was bcc'd among

Re: Censorship on cypherpunks ? Re: [Cryptography] Krugman blockchain currency skepticism

2018-08-15 Thread Razer
Original message From: Greg Newby Date: 8/15/18 8:56 AM (GMT-08:00) To: Cypherpunks Subject: Censorship on cypherpunks ?   Re: [Cryptography] Krugman blockchain   currency skepticism > Is what's below complaining about the cypherpunks list?  I'm the "moderator" > but

Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread Razer
Original message From: John Newman Date: 8/15/18 3:54 AM (GMT-08:00) To: cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org, grarpamp , CypherPunks Subject: Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a   problem? On August 15, 2018 2:31:10 AM CDT, grarpamp wrote:

Re: [Cryptography] Krugman blockchain currency skepticism

2018-08-15 Thread grarpamp
[Resending four replies in one to participants bcc uncensored cypherpunks, as censorship on an already moderator approved, thus explicitly moderator solicited, variety thread where moderator already censored the queue twice resent, and moderator approved questions by posters in thread were left

Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread grarpamp
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 2:46 PM, John Newman wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 01:58:26PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: >> a) Those wealthy will be too busy bidding to murder each other >> like mob bosses, thus thinning their herd and allowing higher >> mass funded prices on their remaining heads. > >

Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread grarpamp
There are some very wealthy early cryptocurrency anarcho OGs. Given a working crypto prediction market, them dropping a million for a solid prediction on when some cantalope will pop... a fun game for them. Any extra kicked in by the masses is just icing on the cake. BTW, the US is well beyond

Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 05:54:33AM -0500, John Newman wrote: > > > On August 15, 2018 2:31:10 AM CDT, grarpamp wrote: > >There are some very wealthy early cryptocurrency anarcho OGs. > >Given a working crypto prediction market, them dropping a million for a > >solid prediction on when some

Hemisphere Project: Parallel Constructing Your World For You

2018-08-15 Thread grarpamp
https://muckrock.s3.amazonaws.com/foia_files/7-3-14_MR6608_RES.pdf Whether for apprehending "criminal" marijuana producers, distributors, users... or for the high crime of social programming and control... all the world's databases, secret surveillance spying, and feelgood swiss cheese that are

Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread jim bell
On Wednesday, August 15, 2018, 3:55:16 AM PDT, John Newman wrote: On August 15, 2018 2:31:10 AM CDT, grarpamp wrote: >>There are some very wealthy early cryptocurrency anarcho OGs. >>Given a working crypto prediction market, them dropping a million for a >>solid prediction on when some

Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread jim bell
On Tuesday, August 14, 2018, 11:38:45 AM PDT, John Newman wrote: On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 04:28:32PM +, jim bell wrote: >> The folllowing article is from Reason Magazine.  Next year's Federal budget >> will include over $700 billion in military spending.   >> I have claimed that my AP

Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread John Newman
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 07:06:10PM +, jim bell wrote: > On Wednesday, August 15, 2018, 11:37:15 AM PDT, John Newman > wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 06:04:12PM +, jim bell wrote: > >  On Wednesday, August 15, 2018, 3:55:16 AM PDT, John Newman > > wrote: > >  > > > > On

Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread grarpamp
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 2:04 PM, jim bell wrote: >>BTW, the US is well beyond bankrupt, search deficit and debt. >>That entire $700B, and more, could be seen as being funded >>by fake money. > > > That's a position which could be taken by people who think that the national > debt will never be

Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread grarpamp
> Does an AP market dominated by a bunch of the fucking > ultra wealthy, whose interests I promise you do not align with yours, > whatever sociopathic method they used to > accrue their capital, even count as a functional AP market? It's arguable whether anyone's interests align with anyone

Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread John Newman
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 01:58:26PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > > Does an AP market dominated by a bunch of the fucking > > ultra wealthy, whose interests I promise you do not align with yours, > > whatever sociopathic method they used to > > accrue their capital, even count as a functional AP

Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread Mirimir
On 08/15/2018 10:58 AM, grarpamp wrote: > b) The masses, again being anonymous and widespread, are > therefore simply not targetable... So why couldn't AP fund a nuclear strike?

Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread grarpamp
>> b) The masses, again being anonymous and widespread, are >> therefore simply not targetable... > > So why couldn't AP fund a nuclear strike? Suicidal overblast, irradiation, loss of wealth sustaining slaves and lands, etc. More plausible, a nuke strike from the AP masses towards - an invading

Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread jim bell
On Wednesday, August 15, 2018, 3:55:16 AM PDT, John Newman wrote: On August 15, 2018 2:31:10 AM CDT, grarpamp wrote: >There are some very wealthy early cryptocurrency anarcho OGs. >Given a working crypto prediction market, them dropping a million for a >solid prediction on when some

Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread John Newman
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 06:04:12PM +, jim bell wrote: > On Wednesday, August 15, 2018, 3:55:16 AM PDT, John Newman > wrote: > > > On August 15, 2018 2:31:10 AM CDT, grarpamp wrote: > >>There are some very wealthy early cryptocurrency anarcho OGs. > >>Given a working crypto prediction

Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread jim bell
On Wednesday, August 15, 2018, 11:37:15 AM PDT, John Newman wrote: On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 06:04:12PM +, jim bell wrote: >  On Wednesday, August 15, 2018, 3:55:16 AM PDT, John Newman >wrote: >  > > On August 15, 2018 2:31:10 AM CDT, grarpamp wrote: > >>There are some very wealthy

Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread grarpamp
> Temple of Justice (Judicial) https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/03/case-allowing-cameras-supreme-court-proceedings/316876/

Re: Next Year's Federal Military budget over $700 billion. Is that a problem?

2018-08-15 Thread juan
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:06:10 + (UTC) jim bell wrote: > > I have explained, above, that even with the use of imaginative accountants, > the "ultra wealthy" currently fund at least a large majority of (for example) > America's Federal Government.   That is incorrect. The money

Re: [Cryptography] Predictions regarding Simon and Speck for 2019

2018-08-15 Thread Zenaan Harkness
Reconsidering Speck (subscribers only for another few days): https://lwn.net/Articles/761992/ Above article discusses why Speck was added and relatively soon, removed, from Linux. The NSA has burned some serious bridges and enough ISO guys know enough crypto to be able to decisively tear the

Perhaps it is no longer appropriate for me to discuss computer vulnerabilities

2018-08-15 Thread Ryan Carboni
But I should say that I suspect the reason for the complex three drug protocol in lethal injection is so that the latter two injections could be replaced by saline. One can only speculate.

God Mode Backdoors, AP Crowdfund vs Wikileaks Models

2018-08-15 Thread grarpamp
> https://www.tomshardware.com/news/x86-hidden-god-mode,37582.html > > Some x86 CPUs have hidden backdoors that let you seize > root by sending a command to an undocumented RISC core that manages > the main CPU, security researcher Christopher Domas told the Black Hat > conference here Thursday