Re: living under algorithmic governance

> So, that picture is 'allowed', but, any other picture that > has 'nudity' in it is not allowed, because 'nudity' is evil. > Especially in children. typical pedophile thinking and retort > fascist, > puritan cesspool, thanks to jew-kkkristian markov

Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

shutup juan your post is worthless

[Admin note] Re: First you have to admit there's a box before you can think outside it...

That email was a thunderbird 'edit as new' and it, for some reason most likely related to the original poster's address, got sent from the address below (The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation) to the list. It made it, and that address to the best of my knowledge doesn't exist, nor do I

First you have to admit there's a box before you can think outside it...

>From a post to another list (political) a few years ago: "Longtime readers of this blog will remember how, some years ago, I pointed out in passing that the survival of the internet in the deindustrial age didn't depend on whether there was some technically feasible way to run an internet in time

Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

On 09/09/2016 07:34 PM, juan wrote: > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 22:27:36 -0600 > Mirimir wrote: > >> On 09/08/2016 10:13 PM, juan wrote: > >>> >>> I only 'abuse' people who advocate mass abuse. If I sound >>> like a broken record it's because there are other broken records >>> constantly promot

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

On 09/09/2016 11:02 AM, Cypher Piggie wrote: >> Bro, you keep sayin' that ;) >> Got a BTC address or something? > > rickroll mah shit large nigga 121Aspd9j8a6t5G3mCvPS3e5H1p3w6PKj2 Bro, there's nothing there :( I meant an address with at least 100 EUR in it :) Better yet, a suitable escrow acco

Re: Fwd: living under algorithmic governance

On 09/09/2016 05:33 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > Facebook Restores Iconic Vietnam War Photo It Censored for Nudity > > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/10/technology/facebook-vietnam-war-photo-nudity.html OK, that's cool :) | When the picture’s takedown went viral, the photo went into wide | circul

Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 22:27:36 -0600 Mirimir wrote: > On 09/08/2016 10:13 PM, juan wrote: > > > > I only 'abuse' people who advocate mass abuse. If I sound > > like a broken record it's because there are other broken records > > constantly promoting things like 'regulation', 'governments'

Re: Fwd: living under algorithmic governance

On 09/09/2016 04:46 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > Interesting point of view... :) Well, until they nationalize Facebook, it's a private firm, and isn't required to host anything that it doesn't want to. It's also not required to answer complaints, except as required by law. When I read this, I won

Re: Cypherpunks Charter

On 09/09/2016 12:22 PM, Razer wrote: > > On 09/09/2016 10:05 AM, Stephen D. Williams wrote: > > >> You say you are going to 'tell you EXACTLY WHY he's "gone all hermit with a >> gun"' and then ... you don't. You say it has something to do with >> gentrification. That's not a why unless you'v

Re: living under algorithmic governance

On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 20:33:18 -0300 Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > Facebook Restores Iconic Vietnam War Photo It Censored for Nudity > > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/10/technology/facebook-vietnam-war-photo-nudity.html So, that picture is 'allowed', but, any other picture that has 'nu

Re: Fwd: living under algorithmic governance

Facebook Restores Iconic Vietnam War Photo It Censored for Nudity http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/10/technology/facebook-vietnam-war-photo-nudity.html sea sea -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Re: Cypherpunks Charter

On 09/09/2016 10:05 AM, Stephen D. Williams wrote: > You say you are going to 'tell you EXACTLY WHY he's "gone all hermit with a > gun"' and then ... you don't. You say it has something to do with > gentrification. That's not a why unless you've already established why > someone should be d

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

On 9/9/16 4:11 AM, John Newman wrote: > > On Sep 9, 2016, at 3:50 AM, Stephen D. Williams > wrote: > >> On 9/2/16 12:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:36:43PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > will work to sync up the archives so that the split brain we'v

Let's Talk About Juan... ;-)

> julian droppin bombs > sea piggie oh now you dont like the free speech and want to make bacon FUCKING HYPOCTIRE an TROLL just like USA JUAN. > As was said last year, my personal intent is to respect the intenet of the founders of this forum/list. which youve bloody well DISrespected since da

Why Government Always Gets Cybersecurity Wrong

Why Government Always Gets Cybersecurity Wrong https://fee.org/articles/why-government-always-gets-cybersecurity-wrong/ sea sea -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Re: Cypherpunks Charter

On 9/9/16 7:42 AM, Razer wrote: > > On 09/08/2016 11:42 PM, Stephen D. Williams wrote: >> And why do you think it was unfair? > > Simply? Because you don't have the vaguest fucking idea where I've been > or what I know. Troll. None of that matters if you can't have a civil and coherent conversatio

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

> Bro, you keep sayin' that ;) > Got a BTC address or something? rickroll mah shit large nigga 121Aspd9j8a6t5G3mCvPS3e5H1p3w6PKj2

Podcast: Ethics and ‘The Zuckerberg Files'

Podcast: Ethics and ‘The Zuckerberg Files’ https://iapp.org/news/a/podcast-ethics-and-the-zuckerberg-files/ "In this episode of The Privacy Advisor Podcast, UC Berkeley's Anna Lauren Hoffman discusses her work in data ethics as she explores the intersection of data, technology, and culture. Spec

Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

> Ignoring trolls is the best policy. sending juan virus for his lil troll dick is best polecy make sure is written by putin to offend his US Status even more

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

> if you want usable list, consider some self-moderation, like not > ( being juan ) juan be addicted to TROLL and other sick things and cannot selfstop till stopped by others

Re: Philosophokiddies

> people agree that it will produce a VERY peaceful, POLITE society.  I've this true, once juan and his troll computer self are eliminated, here will become very peaceful list almost zenlike except for zen problem which someone else put hit for

Re: Cypherpunks Charter

> You think that qualifies as ridicule? I should introduce you to my > ex-wife. You wouldn't last five minutes. there is asshole abuser named juanTROLL that need have his balls SMASHed put back inside him by femdom, please put EX of yours and him in contact he is juan@gmail.com

Re: Philosophokiddies

From: Stephen D. Williams On 9/8/16 9:32 AM, jim bell wrote: I didn't comment about it.  The Purge movies always remind me of AP.  Not the same, but related. http://www.thepurgemovie.co.uk/ >My preference is to consider ideas that are likely to improve things.  AP >doesn't seem prom

Re: Fwd: living under algorithmic governance

About the same subject. Mark Zuckerberg accused of abusing power after Facebook deletes 'napalm girl' post https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/sep/08/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-napalm-girl-photo-vietnam-war sea sea -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right

Re: Philosophokiddies

> Why was vigilantism weeded out in the US? juans mom shoulda weeded that US Citizen ragebaby out to dumpster before become TROLL but her crackho ass was too high to know better

Re: Fwd: living under algorithmic governance

> "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right > to > say it." rught u porkeater > First you create rules that don’t > distinguish between child pornography and famous war photographs. u know what rules juan has about this porn > Then > you practice

Re: Free speech - front lines in Australia - [perso...@bernardgaynor.com.au: Update: battle for free speech]

> "... But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or > another, this much is certain — that it has either authorized > such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to > prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist. " Spooner - > 1867 > > h

Re: Free speech - front lines in Australia - [perso...@bernardgaynor.com.au: Update: battle for free speech]

On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 22:41:45 + (UTC) jim bell wrote: > Sounds like Australia needs the equivalent of America's First > Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech and press.But then again, > that's the same problem Britain has:  They don't have a written > Constitution.      "... But w

Re: Your obsession with Juan

> You are aware that, that a list is not moderated does not mean people > cannot personally block you from their mail preferences, right? oh now youre real smartguy hey like juan so much to say so stupid troll things to everybody block and ban his US Citizen ass then maybe u get ur list back

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 03:33:14PM -, Cypher Piggie wrote: > no you stopped reading it because cocksuckers trolls like juan and > zenan the baby filling it up wit jizz > and technically mr cia smart guy if u stopped reading it u wouldnt have > seen the msg u replied to so ur still here read

Re: My obsession with pigs [was: Re: Your obsession with Juan]

ur stupid mofo u block entire anon email svcs then ur the one making them less useful. what u need do is block TROLLS FROM USA like juan all u sea is juan dodging that so u getting good value from the svc dumbass

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

> There is a "digest" version that aggregates (all) the messages in to fewer all the message from JUAN TROLL into fewer great big spam msg that is.

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

no you stopped reading it because cocksuckers trolls like juan and zenan the baby filling it up wit jizz and technically mr cia smart guy if u stopped reading it u wouldnt have seen the msg u replied to so ur still here reading it > I have stopped reading this list for one reason: the number o

Re: My obsession with pigs [was: Re: Your obsession with Juan]

On 09/08/2016 11:35 PM, Bastiani Fortress wrote: > You are aware that, that a list is not moderated does not mean people > cannot personally block you from their mail preferences, right? > > 5:01 AM, September 9, 2016, Cypher Piggie : > > Fritz Wuehler > Juan. He's an asshole

Re: Cypherpunks Charter

On 09/08/2016 11:42 PM, Stephen D. Williams wrote: > > And why do you think it was unfair? Simply? Because you don't have the vaguest fucking idea where I've been or what I know. Troll. Rr "You are a liar. Which way did you go? By what rivers? By what lakes? Who went with you? Give him to

Re: Pork Rind Disco

Err... It was only a joke with food, uff... :-/ I am vegetarian since my 17 years old and was vegan for one year and some months. Gave up of veganism, I admiss, but great part of my recipes are still vegan and my ex gave me the "Veganomicon" book as gift years ago. So, my Cthulhu is vegan, don'

Re: Fuck Google

On Sep 9, 2016 8:56 AM, "YoungSole" wrote: > > > Cecilia Tanaka: > > There are lots of awesome people [at] Google > > Fuck every last one of them. Fuck all of them?! Wow!!! Lots of sex!!! :D :D :D Thank your for the poem, Sole. Do you like opera? I love it! <3 http://youtu.be/ERD4CbBDNI

Pork Rind Disco

Chicharones. > Cecilia Tanaka: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torresmo Statement from link: "In many ancient cultures, animal fats were the only way of obtaining oil for cooking and it was common in many people's diet until the industrial revolution made vegetable oils more common and more affo

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

But didnt you just add to that number :D On 9 September 2016 13:03:09 GMT+01:00, d...@geer.org wrote: >I have stopped reading this list for one reason: the number of >messages. > >Arrivederci

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 08:03:09AM -0400, d...@geer.org wrote: > I have stopped reading this list for one reason: the number of messages. There is a "digest" version that aggregates (all) the messages in to fewer emails: https://lists.cpunks.org/mailman/options/cypherpunks - Greg

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

I have stopped reading this list for one reason: the number of messages. Arrivederci

Fuck Google

> Cecilia Tanaka: > There are lots of awesome people [at] Google Fuck every last one of them. --- Mothafuck Google They colonized the internet Gave us free shit We were the mothafuckin' product Not cuz it's a monopoly It's bigger than a country Something like the modern version of the Dutch

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

> On Sep 9, 2016, at 3:50 AM, Stephen D. Williams wrote: > >> On 9/2/16 12:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:36:43PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: will work to sync up the archives so that the split brain we've been >>> Don't taint the provenance... just as your archive

Fwd: living under algorithmic governance

Interesting point of view... :) sea sea -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Forwarded message -- From: "Felix Stalder" Date: Sep 9, 2016 5:35 AM Subject: living under algorithmic governance To: "Listen, Mark, this is seri

Re: Your obsession with Juan

You are aware that, that a list is not moderated does not mean people cannot personally block you from their mail preferences, right?5:01 AM, September 9, 2016, Cypher Piggie : Fritz Wuehler Juan. He's an assholeyes he's an asshole. and a troll. and a USA loving US citizen.-- You’re not from the Ca

Re: Philosophokiddies

On 9/8/16 9:32 AM, jim bell wrote: > *From:*Stephen D. Williams > > > > On 9/7/16 5:59 PM, jim bell wrote: >> *From:*Stephen D. Williams >> On 9/6/16 9:01 PM, jim bell wrote: >> ... >> >I didn't comment about it. The Purge movies always remind me of AP. Not >> >the same,

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

On 9/8/16 7:17 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > On 09/08/2016 10:03 PM, Mirimir wrote: > > On 09/08/2016 07:39 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > >> On 09/05/2016 12:15 PM, Александр wrote: > > > >> Well that's odd. I wonder what it's about? Splitting the list > >> into what? Two with different themes? One Mod

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

On 9/2/16 12:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:36:43PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: >>> will work to sync up the archives so that the split brain we've been >> Don't taint the provenance... just as your archive contains only yours, >> this file should only contain messages from n

Re: WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio

On 09/09/2016 01:14 AM, grarpamp wrote: > https://deepmind.com/blog/wavenet-generative-model-raw-audio/ > https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12455510 Oh well. As erichocean noted, "I give us 10-15 years before it's not possible to trust anything you see or hear that's recorded." Also anything tr

WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio

https://deepmind.com/blog/wavenet-generative-model-raw-audio/ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12455510

Re: Cypherpunks Charter

On 9/8/16 8:59 AM, Razer wrote: > On 09/08/2016 06:49 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >> Stephen, a hint: when real men realise they have ridiculed someone >> unfairly, for example with shit like this: >> Do you suffer from some version of, as my friend used to say, "post 1960's perception dis