http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/06/technology/yahoo-email-tech-companies-government-investigations.html
]
Yahoo was ordered last year to search incoming emails for the digital
“signature” of a communications method used by a state-sponsored, foreign
terrorist organization, according to a governmen
On 10/04/2016 08:49 PM, jim bell wrote:
>
>
> *From:* Shawn K. Quinn
>
> On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 02:26 +, jim bell wrote:
>
>>> Generally speaking, American Federal laws are not applicable outside
>>> the United States (and its territories) unless the law explicitly says
>>> so. The term
On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 04:07:52 -
xorc...@sigaint.org wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 00:29 -0300, juan wrote:
> >> On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 22:17:36 -0500
> >> "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > I do agree in principle that the information needs to get out
> >> > there, and for the US govern
> On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 00:29 -0300, juan wrote:
>> On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 22:17:36 -0500
>> "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > I do agree in principle that the information needs to get out there,
>> > and for the US government to try to keep it secret is at least a bit
>> > un-American, if not fla
From: Razer
On 10/04/2016 08:07 PM, juan wrote:
>> ...but I don't think the mafia known as 'american government'
>> would agree with that. Subjects, hostages or 'citizens' of the
>> american government are, well, subjected to that mafia. The
>> subjection has little to do with w
From: Shawn K. Quinn
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 02:26 +, jim bell wrote:
>> Generally speaking, American Federal laws are not applicable outside
>> the United States (and its territories) unless the law explicitly says
>> so. The term is called "extraterritorial jurisdiction"
>> https://en.
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 00:29 -0300, juan wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 22:17:36 -0500
> "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote:
>
> >
> > I do agree in principle that the information needs to get out there,
> > and for the US government to try to keep it secret is at least a bit
> > un-American, if not flagrantly
>> The term is called "extraterritorial jurisdiction"
>
> A double criminal absurdity. The mafia known as government has
> no real 'jurisdiction' in the territory they usurp, let alone in
> territories 'belonging' to other mafias.
On this, at least, we can agree completely.
The
On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 22:17:36 -0500
"Shawn K. Quinn" wrote:
>
> I do agree in principle that the information needs to get out there,
> and for the US government to try to keep it secret is at least a bit
> un-American, if not flagrantly so.
Au contraire. It's 100% american. That's what y
On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 20:07 -0700, Razer wrote:
> I was going to bring up the concept that corporate officers (at least)
> are really OWNED by the corporation that employs them and the US
> government probably considers them as 'being in the US' no matter
> where they go as long as they're in the e
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 02:26 +, jim bell wrote:
> Generally speaking, American Federal laws are not applicable outside
> the United States (and its territories) unless the law explicitly says
> so. The term is called "extraterritorial jurisdiction"
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterritori
On 10/04/2016 08:07 PM, juan wrote:
>
> ...but I don't think the mafia known as 'american government'
> would agree with that. Subjects, hostages or 'citizens' of the
> american government are, well, subjected to that mafia. The
> subjection has little to do with which po
On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 02:26:53 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
>
> Generally speaking, American Federal laws are not applicable outside
> the United States (and its territories) unless the law explicitly
> says so.
> The term is called "extraterritorial jurisdiction"
A double criminal absurd
From: Razer "“Federal law prohibits us from answering your question, and we’re
>currently suing the Justice Department for the ability to disclose more
>information about government requests,” Twitter spokesman Nu Wexler said
>in a statement."
Generally speaking, American Federal laws are not a
It's noted in the article that Twitter did a FISA/FISC Glomar:
"“Federal law prohibits us from answering your question, and we’re
currently suing the Justice Department for the ability to disclose more
information about government requests,” Twitter spokesman Nu Wexler said
in a statement."
On 1
On 10/04/2016 02:30 PM, jim bell wrote:
> Yahoo secretly scanned customer emails for US intelligence-sources
http://dailym.ai/2dOI1gj via http://dailym.ai/android
>
I wonder if the execs who approved this or someone on Y!'s legal team
who advised them to comply is secretly on Google's payroll or
16 matches
Mail list logo
