> juan juan.g71 at gmail.com
> Tue Feb 21 16:49:01 PST 2017
>
> you right wingers.Fuck you.
You dumb cunt, I agreed with you and provided more details into the laws. I
guess we can't expect you to provide much more value to the list than Cecilia,
calling names instead of putting forth a
> juan juan.g71 at gmail.com
> Tue Feb 21 15:35:47 PST 2017
>
> Sure, 'exponential' growth.
You are correct. I should have written 'near-linear growth'. I see you agree
with rest.
> That shows exactly what kind of dishonest and retarded asshole you are.
Lol. Wut.
https://
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:23:47 -0500
Anti Fag wrote:
> > exactly the point in time when 'statistics' started to 'go through
> > the roof'
>
> It is exponential in growth since 70's, read pdfs, don't be like John.
> From some shit linked before:
Thanks. That shows
> juan juan.g71 at gmail.com
> Tue Feb 21 11:00:54 PST 2017
>
> made the legal definition of rape much wider in 2005
Only thing about 2004/5 "expansion" of the "rape" "law" that I could find (wiki
source was shit) was "rape with more offenders": 2005: 90 Våldtäkt
utvidgas/våldtäktpå
> juan juan.g71 at gmail.com
> Mon Feb 20 20:54:36 PST 2017
>
> Swedish law has an extremely expansive definition of what qualifies as rape
> under the law
In that they define "incapable of giving consent" as rape. But that's just
another night out on the town for you, huh ?
--
The