Thus spake cypherpunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [28/04/05 18:48]:
: A remailer posted about EncFS. Gerow quoted the first paragraph and
: added the criticism that it doesn't do locking. Dixon saw the quoted
: first paragraph, which said that the link to the program was "below".
: And indeed, it was below
On 2005-04-28T15:37:19-0700, cypherpunk wrote:
> > Matthew's snapshots: one
> > (http://www.boingboing.net/images/Liberty-Locker-Thumbs-2.jpg), two
> > (http://www.boingboing.net/images/Liberty-Locker-Thumbs1.jpg).
>
> If this were really as much of a conspiracy as people are making it
> out to be
The question is, with regard to Google, does turning "personal
history" on or off make a difference in what records they keep about
your searches? Obviously if it's on they do keep records, but if you
disable it or never turn it on, does that mean that they don't keep
records?
http://www.google.co
A remailer posted about EncFS. Gerow quoted the first paragraph and
added the criticism that it doesn't do locking. Dixon saw the quoted
first paragraph, which said that the link to the program was "below".
And indeed, it was below, in the first message from the remailer. It
included this link, htt
> Matthew's snapshots: one
> (http://www.boingboing.net/images/Liberty-Locker-Thumbs-2.jpg), two
> (http://www.boingboing.net/images/Liberty-Locker-Thumbs1.jpg).
If this were really as much of a conspiracy as people are making it
out to be, wouldn't it make sense to ask for THUMB prints? that's wh
- Forwarded message from Declan McCullagh -
From: Declan McCullagh
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:30:43 -0400
To: politech@politechbot.com
Subject: [Politech] Thumbprinting visitors at the Statue of Liberty
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)
Previous Politech message:
h
One's own successful business.
Flexibility in the work days and hrs.
Work from your residence anywhere in the world.
Current associates are at 5,000US to 12,000US per/Mo.
Helping our courts.
Professional customer training and assistance.
http://vga.Cu.modernproductquest.com/lj/
For additional
> I'm still having trouble understanding your threat model.
Just assume braindeath and it becomes obvious.
No tla with any dignity left would bother e-mail providers or try to get your
password. All it need to do is fill gforms and get access to tapped traffic at
major nodes (say, 20 in US is suf
Seu email para ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) com assunto ( OI) foi rejeitado por conter
virus.
Virus encontrados: Worm.Mydoom.AQ
No, the threat model was outlined in a previous post. Consider some "agency"
that has lots of resources and technologies, but also doesn't particularly
want local authorities or (for instance) hotmail to know what they are
doing. In general, this is going to make their operation much less
intru
Dear potential Speaker:
On behalf of the organizing committee, I would like to extend a cordial
invitation for you to attend one of the upcoming IPSI BgD multidisciplinary,
interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary conferences.
The first one will take place in Sveti Stefan, Montenegro:
IPSI-200
I'm still having trouble understanding your threat model.
If you're talking about somebody who can get Hotmail's cooperation, e.g.
cops or sysadmins,
there's no way you can prevent them from doing anything they want to your
incoming mail.
If you're worried about crackers guessing your password,
Thus spake Jim Dixon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [28/04/05 09:41]:
: > It also doesn't do locking.
:
: There was nothing "below".
Someone I know just tried it out three days ago. He said it flat-out didn't
'lock' the files properly. It's got nothing to do with having something
"below".
Yes, but this almost misses the point.
Is it possible to detect ('for certain', within previously mentioned
boundary conditions) that some has read it? This is a different problem from
merely trying to retain secrecy.
Remember, my brain is a little punch-drunk from all the Fight Club fighting.
B
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Damian Gerow wrote:
> Thus spake Userbeam Remailer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [27/04/05 02:33]:
> : EncFS provides an encrypted filesystem in user-space. It runs without
> : any special permissions and uses the FUSE library and Linux kernel
> : module to provide the filesystem interf
- Forwarded message from Dave Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Dave Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:46:18 -0500
To: ip
Subject: [IP] more on Privacy tip: be wary of Google's "personal history"
feature [priv]
X-Mailer: Lonely Cat Games ProfiMail
Reply-To: [EMAIL PRO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A
Can anyone figure out a way to determine if one's hotmail, etc...has
been
looked at or not?
Hi.
Email is more or less like sending a post card. Anyone inbetween can
take a
peek if they have the knowledge. (And not much knowledge is required).
Thi
17 matches
Mail list logo
