Hello,
Let me get right to the point...
Our highly successful internet company would like to offer you an
exclusive business opportunity where real people like myself will show
you how to make up to $5,000 or more per month (part-time) in extra income.
If you want to make money with your
to get your unique id number.
That's all there's to it.
We'll then send you info, and you can make up your own mind.
Looking forward to hearing from you!
Sincerely,
Justin Walter
P.S. After having several negative experiences with network
marketing companies I had pretty much given up
to get your unique id number.
That's all there's to it.
We'll then send you info, and you can make up your own mind.
Looking forward to hearing from you!
Sincerely,
Justin Walter
P.S. After having several negative experiences with network
marketing companies I had pretty much given up
Title: Untitled Document
You want to know how we got these
girls to do EVERYTHING we wanted?
We got them drunk! These teen girls
will do anything when they are drunk. I mean suck the
biggest, dirtiest, cock and swallow huge cum loads. We have full downloadable
movies of
all the
Jim Dixon (2003-12-19 13:30Z) wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, J.A. Terranson wrote:
In a nutshell, our Constitution *recognizes* universal human rights.
It does not *establish* these rights. If we are going to be
faithful to this premise, physical location is a non-sequitor.
This is a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-12-21 03:50Z) wrote:
I don't know who you are referring too, but that comment is amusing,
because it is exactly the kind of lambaste broadside that one hears on
Faux news channel all the time. Anyway, I say that Saddam has human
rights, just like everyone else, which
Michael Kalus (2003-12-21 13:14Z) wrote:
How can we offer him procedural guarantees enjoyed by U.S. residents
when we won't be the ones conducting procedure at his trial? He's
going to be tried in the ICC or by Iraqis in Iraqi courts. We have
no good evidence that he's committed crimes
Michael Kalus (2003-12-22 00:28Z) wrote:
As Bill Stuart pointed out, this is not an American war. This is a
war (or so the U.S. claims) based on alleged violation of an
agreement between Iraq and the UN. It seems to me that American
Courts or American Tribunals have no authority to
Tim May (2004-01-02 02:42Z) wrote:
Bob, a crack addict collecting disability or welfare or other
government freebies, works 0% of his time for the government/society.
(Dat not true. I gots to stands in line to get my check increased!)
Do those who have previously been in the workforce, in
Tim May (2004-01-02 05:46Z) wrote:
On Jan 1, 2004, at 8:26 PM, Justin wrote:
Do those who have previously been in the workforce, in your opinion,
have the right to reclaim through welfare any amount up to that they've
paid through taxes to the entity providing welfare/unemployment
Thoenen, Peter Mr CN Sprint SFOR (2004-01-08 12:55Z) wrote:
Cross posting on multiple nodes since none seem reliable.
The minder.net ingress address seems to me to work fine. I subscribed
through lne and pro-ds, and both seem to work well, with the following
caveat.
Based on a brief
Tyler Durden (2004-01-15 18:00Z) wrote:
Thank goodness Mr Bush is finally thinking long term.
Not only will the Lunar Base focus all of our attention away from the wars
and other nastiness down here, it will get us to the moon before Al Qaeda
and bin Laden ever have a chance to start
Pete Capelli (2004-01-15 20:12Z) wrote:
Of course, bankrupting the U.S. and getting a base on the moon are both
useful objectives. With no financially viable country owning the lunar
outpost, things could get quite interesting.
Can't we just match this up with the 60% of the federal
Trei, Peter (2004-01-15 21:39Z) wrote:
Does anyone think it will take less than trillions
of dollars to establish a moon base?
The more realistic numbers I've heard are $400 billion
for a moon base, double that for a Mars mission. I don't
know the incremental cost to sustain the moonbase.
Steve Furlong (2004-02-13 22:34Z) wrote:
Eric is correct in his reply to MV's article. Joe Programmer isn't
necessarily obligated not to look at leaked trade secrets, but if he
implements anything remotely related to the leaked secret, he and his
employers or customers are subject to being
Major Variola (ret) (2004-03-01 18:01Z) wrote:
In order to avoid places with ears (and homeless people with
directional mics, see _Enemy of the State_) go to a park that you
haven't been to before. And perform the usual CI driving maneuvres
(see that Tomlinson book _The Big Breach_ for a
Sandy Harris (2004-03-04 01:48Z) wrote:
someone wrote:
I'm currently doing a research paper, with the topic of cryptography
being essiantial for society, ...
I was wondering if there where any particular books, websites, ...
One web page with a lot of links:
R. A. Hettinga (2004-03-15 02:07Z) wrote:
http://online.wsj.com/article_print/0,,SB107930573476054980,00.html
If You Want to Protect
A Security Secret,
Make Sure It's Public
What is terrible article titles for $500, Alex?
--
That woman deserves her revenge... and... we deserve to die.
Major Variola (ret) (2004-03-24 18:28Z) wrote:
The only reason to speak to feds or cold-calling police is
counter intel, learn what they're interested in. And then publish that.
That is a very dangerous game, but it may soon become the only option.
It's only a matter of time before remaining
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-03-25 22:27Z) wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Nonsense -- corporations are not humans, they have zero rights.
Unfortunately, there are a whole slew of Supreme Court decisions that say
otherwise - mostly applying the 14th amendment (you know,
Harmon Seaver (2004-03-25 23:06Z) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 05:27:14PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Nonsense -- corporations are not humans, they have zero rights.
Unfortunately, there are a whole slew of Supreme Court
R. A. Hettinga (2004-03-26 02:20Z) wrote:
blah blah (those nasty latin words ceterus paribus) blah blah
Those nasty latin words are ceteris paribus.
--
That woman deserves her revenge... and... we deserve to die.
-- Budd, Kill Bill Vol. 1
Tyler Durden (2004-03-29 14:50Z) wrote:
As for May, I don't miss his killing, but I definitely miss his edge and
occasional insite.
Insight.
Don't ask who pissed in my wheaties.
--
If you don't do this thing, you won't be in any shape to walk out of here.
Would that be physically, or just
R. A. Hettinga (2004-03-31 16:41Z) wrote:
At 10:26 AM -0500 3/31/04, Trei, Peter wrote:
* Evaporating LPG (liquids do not 'sublimate')...
As for sublimate, when you toss a cup of boiling water into the air
at extremely cold temperatures it converts straight into a gas, all
at once. That's
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3596033.stm
In February last year he told the UN Security Council that Iraq had
developed mobile laboratories for making biological weapons.
On Friday he conceded that information appears not to be... that solid.
...
Mr Powell said the US intelligence
Harmon Seaver (2004-04-03 22:44Z) wrote:
Here's another meme on the issue:
U.S. Unloading WMD in Iraq
In addition, former chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix has emphasized
that the U.S. and British intelligence agencies issued false reports on
Iraq leading to the U.S. attack.
J.A. Terranson (2004-04-03 22:22Z) wrote:
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Justin wrote:
The intelligence, even if it was originally true, may have been
leaked and then the mobile (and other) weapons factories and storage
destroyed. The intended result would have been the current
situation
Dave Howe (2004-04-13 14:11Z) wrote:
Justin wrote:
It's not just a private interaction between two consenting parties.
It's a contract that grants power to a third party eliminating
traditional legal guarantees of quasi-privacy in communication from
sender to recipient, one of which
John Young (2004-05-11 00:09Z) wrote:
Brian Dunbar wrote:
Like it matters. Do you really think that the government would really
allow Intel and AMD to sell CPUs that didn't have tiny transmitters in
them?
Your CPU is actually transmitting every instruction it executes to the
Thomas Shaddack (2004-04-28 18:32Z) wrote:
What won't hurt could be making them liable for their promises, as they
can be considered to be a contract with the voters. With specific
penalties for not delivering the results in the specified timeframe.
Presidents don't pass laws. Presidential
Graham Lally (2004-04-28 14:47Z) wrote:
Damian Gerow wrote:
I don't see any way to educate the mass public.
Indeed, why bother? How about a system that removes your right to vote
if you haven't exercised it in the last 3 elections?
Requiring that adults vote is a terrible idea. While
On 2004-06-11T20:22:33-0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
Well, burn down my unabomber shack! Have we smoked out Tim May? As much as
his one-sided thinking pisses me off sometimes I miss the sheer fuck you
of it.
From: Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If so, it's quite a clever disguise.
User-Agent:
On 2004-06-13T17:50:43-0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
RAH wrote...
I'd like to hear how children who werent old enough to pronounce the
colour were 'reds' who were rightly tortured (apparently) in your
view, as well as the many women raped and tortured at the hands of
SOA graduates.
Funny
Christ. The U.S. is now officially a Christian nation.
- Forwarded message from Marty Lederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:56:31 -0400
To: Conlawprof List; Law Religion issues for Law Academics List
Subject: The Merits in Newdow
The collection of concurrences on the
On 2004-06-21T22:38:01-0700, Steve Schear wrote:
Not a problem. Its legal to use any name you wish, including those that
use gyphs and sounds which cannot be represented by standard Roman and
non-Roman alphabets (as is common in some African tribes). So, those that
wish to avoid this data
On 2004-06-22T02:52:15-0400, Gabriel Rocha wrote:
On Jun 21 2004, Steve Schear wrote:
| Not a problem. Its legal to use any name you wish, including those that
| use gyphs and sounds which cannot be represented by standard Roman and
| non-Roman alphabets (as is common in
On 2004-06-27T18:26:05-0500, J.A. Terranson wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
snip
All because you don't want to throw away your vote -- and register your
disapproval with that state of affairs -- by voting for a guy who would
make you feel decent and clean.
In *any*
On 2004-06-27T17:53:05-0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2004/Jun-27-Sun-2004/opinion/24127406.html
I will vote for a candidate who -- if he had his way -- would [...]
pull us out of the deadly, illegal and unconstitutional war in Iraq;
and put the U.S.
On 2004-07-06T11:28:41-0700, Eric Cordian wrote:
Sunder wrote:
Right, WTC as a target doesn't make any strategic sense.
Doesn't hitting a world financial center impede the funding of imperialism?
Empirically, I don't think so. Since September 11th, funding to the
military and security
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/07/06/iraq.main/index.html
BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- A previously unknown militant group in Iraq is
threatening to kill the most-wanted terror suspect in that country: Abu
Musab al-Zarqawi.
The Arabic-language TV network Al-Arabiya said it received a taped
On 2004-07-09T01:46:26+0200, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
It fails on hotmail.com; my script has problems there as well (and with
couple others, the cure seems to be adding delays between the lines sent
to the server; it makes the program slow, but more reliable).
This should work much better,
This one should work better. The last one had string comparison
problems.
#!/usr/bin/perl
use IO::Select;
use IO::Socket;
use Net::DNS;
$ehloname = mail.senate.gov;
$timeout = 15;
$dlevel = 0;
sub debug {
(my $str, my $mlevel) = @_;
if ($mlevel = $dlevel) { print DEBUG $str; }
}
sub
http://news.myway.com/top/article/id/415877|top|07-19-2004::15:07|reuters.html
Jul 19, 2:57 PM (ET)
HOUSTON (Reuters) - Law enforcement officials said on Monday they are
looking for a man seen taking pictures of two refineries in Texas City,
Texas.
Texas City, located on the Texas Gulf coast
On 2004-07-20T21:47:31+0200, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
The person in question was just somebody with a weakness for industrial
architecture.
You're missing the big picture: A light-skinned person with dark hair, a
camera, a white van and an oil refinery, all in Shrub's home state.
That's a bona
On 2004-07-25T13:44:39-0500, Declan McCullagh wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 10:20:44PM -0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
No, I don't know that Atheists should be considered as citizens,
nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under
God. -GW Bush
Do you have a good
On 2004-08-25T10:28:34-0400, Sunder wrote:
All Hail Cthulhu! Why worship the lesser evil?
Vote for Cthulhu! Why vote for the lesser evil?
You're saying Cthulhu is a greater evil than Bush?
Mr. Three Purple Hearts is fairly evil as well. I don't know whether he
surpasses Cthulhu though.
On 2004-08-27T13:14:47-0700, Steve Schear wrote:
At 04:12 AM 8/27/2004, you wrote:
On 2004-08-25T11:25:09-0700, Steve Schear wrote:
Like a shoemaker who only has hammers in his toolkit, Chaum is trying to
fix the wrong problem. The problems with voting in the U.S. aren't
current
or
On 2004-08-30T17:40:25-0700, Steve Schear wrote:
At 05:23 AM 8/30/2004, Justin wrote:
Are States geopolitical distortions as well? Are countries?
If you're going to propose an alternate system, please clearly identify
1) the voting pool, and 2) what they're voting for. If the pool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2004-09-06T06:22:29-0700, Sarad AV wrote:
the election commision of india had a proposal to the
govt. that the voter should be able to vote for 'none
of the above'. Though one can predict that such a
proposal will never be approved by the
On 2004-09-10T12:02:12-0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
Damn right. 'Conservative' means agreeing with the most vocal proponents of
the current right wing apparatchiks. It seems to have little or no
relationship to fiscally conservative ideas.
Aren't the most vocal proponents of right-wing
On 2004-09-16T20:11:56-0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 02:17 PM 9/16/04 -0700, Joe Touch wrote:
Except that certs need to be signed by authorities that are trusted.
Name one.
Oh, come on. Nothing can be absolutely trusted. How much security is
enough?
Aren't the DOD CAs trusted
On 2004-09-17T19:27:09-0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 06:20 AM 9/17/04 +, Justin wrote:
On 2004-09-16T20:11:56-0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 02:17 PM 9/16/04 -0700, Joe Touch wrote:
Except that certs need to be signed by authorities that are trusted.
Name one.
Oh
On 2004-10-03T13:32:36-0500, J.A. Terranson wrote:
The US *is* the Fourth Reich.
Personally, I will take what comes.
--
The old must give way to the new, falsehood must become exposed by truth,
and truth, though fought, always in the end prevails. -- L. Ron Hubbard
On 2004-10-16T22:12:52-0400, Sunder wrote:
There is still of course the matter of the unexploded bombs in that
building that were dug out, and that the ATF received a Don't come in to
work page on their beepers, and the seize and classification of all
surveilance video tapes from things
On 2004-10-22T14:59:26-0400, John Kelsey wrote:
From: Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Oct 19, 2004 10:23 AM
Subject: US Retardation of Free Markets (was Airport insanity)
More than that, some of the countries we've been kicked out or prevented
from influencing have been modernizing
On 2004-10-25T10:00:46-0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
Peter Capelli wrote...
Yet what of your blindness, which doubts *everything* the current
administration does?
1. Abu Ghraib
2. WMD in Iraq
3. Patriot Act
4. Countless ties between this administration and the major contract
winners in
On 2004-10-25T22:32:48+0200, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 03:20:28PM -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
*Nobody* was a counterbalance to Tim, me or anyone else. Simple fact, no
matter how much he pissed on my shoes, or anyone else's.
What's he up to these days? It seems he got
On 2004-11-06T16:39:41+0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 08:46:17AM -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
So: A 'moral values' question for Cypherpunks. Does this election indict
the American people as being complicit in the crime known as Operation
Of course. What kind of question
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/07/politics/07court.html?partner=ALTAVISTA1pagewanted=print
We're going to get some extremist anti-abortion, pro-internment,
anti-1A, anti-4A, anti-5A, anti-14A, right-wing wacko.
Imagine Ashcroft as Chief Justice.
I really hope I'm wrong.
What happens when the
On 2004-11-08T20:42:33-0800, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
How does this change if I'm a child whose trust fund contains the
stock? Or if I hold a mutual fund I inherited with a little Exxon
stock
What part of collateral damage don't you understand?
Yep. When we shoot at people we think
On 2004-11-08T10:09:41-0500, John Kelsey wrote:
Kerry spent essentially no time talking about the creepy implications
of the Jose Padilla case (isn't he still being held incommunicado,
pending filing in the right district?), or the US government's use of
torture in the war on terror despite
On 2004-11-27T06:36:24-0800, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 09:13 AM 11/27/04 +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Link: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/27/0026222
Posted by: michael, on 2004-11-27 05:05:00
low-cost solution: '[I]incorporate a layer of metal foil into the
cover of the
On 2004-12-01T10:27:59-0500, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/11/30/mexican_verichip_hype/print.html
In a 19 July, 2004 press release, Albrecht made a clear mention of the
imaginary 160:
Promoting implanted RFID devices as a security measure is downright
'loco,'
On 2004-12-08T10:30:22-0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
From: Major Variola (ret) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saw in a recent _Science_ that Ben Green of Cambridge proved
that for any N, there are an infinite number of evenly spaced
progressions
of primes that are N numbers long. He got a prize for that.
On 2004-12-08T11:10:28-0500, Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
Tyler Durden wrote:
What about where N=1?
I don't understand. You can only have an infinite number (or number of
progressions) where the number of numbers in a number is inifinite.
differing by 2. The _Science_ article is behind
On 2004-12-10T15:50:22-0500, Steve Thompson wrote:
--- R.W. (Bob) Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Thompson wrote:
--- R.W. (Bob) Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Colouring outside the lines]
Yes, you have a point there.I guess a better cover would be as local
On 2004-12-11T06:48:41-0800, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 09:47 PM 12/10/04 -0800, Joseph Ashwood wrote:
Now we're back to the MixMaster argument. Mixmaster was meant to be a
Napster-level popular app for emailing, but people just don't care
about anonymity.
Mixmaster is the most
On 2004-12-15T10:14:14-0500, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
This popped up in my bearer filter this morning...
Cheers,
RAH
---
http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles/1494863/12142004/story.jhtml
MTV.com - Movies - News
12.14.2004 9:03 PM EST
Reel To Real: Do 'Ocean's Twelve'-Style
On 2004-12-16T05:50:22-0500, Adam Back wrote:
So PGP are now running a pgp key server which attempts to consolidate
the inforamtion from the existing key servers, but screen it by
ability to receive email at the address.
...
So here's the problem: it does not mention anything about checking
On 2004-12-21T10:38:10-0600, J.A. Terranson wrote:
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
put it this way it starts to make some sense. In other words, avoiding
travel whenever possible will (when added to sheeple starting to do the same
because of all the terible screening stories)
On 2005-01-06T12:06:40-0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
Well, I used to be pro gun-control prior to the Patriot Act. Guess the
Patriot Act made me something of a Patriot.
What else would the PATRIOT act do? That's a particularly malicious
psychological trick on the part of the miserable bastards
On 2005-01-08T12:54:25-0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
What else would the PATRIOT act do? That's a particularly malicious
That was scarcasm.
psychological trick on the part of the miserable bastards who named it.
It doesn't so much matter that it's obvious.
Somehow, I don't think the bastards
On 2005-01-10T15:04:21-0500, Trei, Peter wrote:
John Kelsey
Ready, Aim, ID Check: In Wrong Hands, Gun Won't Fire
By ANNE EISENBERG
I just wonder what the false negative rates are. Seem like a
A remarkable number of police deaths are 'own gun'
incidents, so the police do have
On 2005-01-10T15:42:47-0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
And we'll probably have many years of non-Smart-Gun type accidents...eg,
Drunk guy at party put gun to his head and blew his own brains out,
assuming it was a smart gun, or, trailer park momma gives gun to toddler
assuming its a safe smart
On 2005-01-11T10:07:22-0500, Trei, Peter wrote:
Justin wrote:
I don't believe the article when it says that smart guns are useless
if stolen. What do they have, a tamper-proof memory chip storing a
128-bit reprogramming authorization key that must be input via
computer before allowing
On 2005-01-13T17:46:39-0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
He's smearing his sticky fingerprints all over everything else,
and now he wants them in our passports?
Oughtta learn to keep his hands to himself.
Fine with me if the first person to get a new biometric passport gets
Ridge's fingers as part
On 2005-01-13T17:48:13-0800, Eric Cordian wrote:
RAH pastes:
She said that on at least one occasion he showed her something he had
purchased via the Internet and expressed concern that if their cat
inadvertently ate enough of it, the cat would die, according to the
affidavit.
On 2005-01-14T16:54:32-0500, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
http://www.wnbc.com/print/4075959/detail.html
Police Worried About New Vest-Penetrating Gun
I care? Well, perhaps I do... I should go pick one up before they're
banned.
The most shocking fact may be that the gun -- known as the five-seven
On 2005-01-14T15:42:18-0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
At 01:54 PM 1/14/2005, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
http://www.wnbc.com/print/4075959/detail.html
NEW YORK -- There is a nationwide alert to members of law enforcement
regarding a new kind of handgun which can render a bulletproof vest
useless, as
On 2005-01-15T09:38:23+, Justin wrote:
On 2005-01-14T15:42:18-0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
Seems like scare-mongering to me, not a practical concern.
Of course it's not a practical concern. Criminals already have access
to handguns that will defeat common soft body armor. This media
On 2005-01-16T09:46:28-0500, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 01:32:46 EST, Henry Yen said:
. panix.net usable as panix.com (marcotte) Sat Jan 15 10:44:57 2005
So let's see.. the users will see this when they log into
On 2005-01-20T12:16:34+0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Scientific American has little clue, as usual (see their nanotechnology
retraction).
How could they possibly get clue? Scientists don't want to write
pop-sci articles for a living. It's impossible to condense most current
research down to
http://news.com.com/2102-1030_3-5551903.html?tag=st.util.print
Hollywood studios filed a second round of lawsuits against online
movie-swappers on Wednesday, stepping up legal pressure on the file-trading
community.
As much as I'd like to be upset, they are driving innovation of p2p
On 2005-01-28T20:03:22-0500, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-Arabic-Software.html?oref=loginpagewanted=printposition=
The New York Times
January 27, 2005
Scientists Work on Software to Scan Arabic
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
``The whole Internet is skewed
On 2005-01-29T13:16:24+0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Link: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/29/030223
Posted by: michael, on 2005-01-29 11:03:00
from the if-you're-innocent-you-have-nothing-to-fear dept.
[1]Richard M. Smith writes Tukwila, Washington firefighter, Philip
Scott
On 2005-02-04T14:30:48-0500, Mark Allen Earnest wrote:
The government was not able to get the Clipper chip passed and that was
backed with the horror stories of rampant pedophilia, terrorism, and
organized crime. Do you honestly believe they will be able to destroy
open source, linux,
On 2005-02-04T23:28:56+0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 08:21:47PM +, Justin wrote:
They managed with the HTDV broadcast flag mandate.
If I film off a HDTV screen with a HDTV camera (or just do single-frame
with a good professional camera) will the flag be preserved
On 2005-02-03T22:25:28+0100, Anonymous wrote:
The only people endangered by this capability are those who want to be
able to lie. They want to agree to contracts and user agreements that,
for example, require them to observe DRM restrictions and copyright
laws, but then they want the power to
On 2005-02-09T22:38:05-0600, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 09:09 -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
--
There is nothing stopping you from writing your own operating
system, so Linus did.
Linus Torvalds didn't write the GNU OS. He wrote the Linux kernel, which
when added to
On 2005-02-13T13:22:43+0100, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Tyler Durden wrote:
Well, I didn't say it would be easy. We'd definitely need to split up into
teams...one to handle the alarm systems,
Teamwork is essential here.
...
Optionally just add couple more mines and
On 2005-02-15T13:23:37-0500, Steve Thompson wrote:
--- James A. Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
As governments were created to smash property rights, they are
always everywhere necessarily the enemy of those with property,
and the greatest enemy of those with the most property.
On 2005-02-15T21:40:34+, Justin wrote:
On 2005-02-15T13:23:37-0500, Steve Thompson wrote:
--- James A. Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
As governments were created to smash property rights, they are
always everywhere necessarily the enemy of those with property
On 2005-02-16T13:18:16-0500, Steve Thompson wrote:
--- Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-02-15T13:23:37-0500, Steve Thompson wrote:
--- James A. Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip]
As governments were created to smash property rights, they are
always everywhere
On 2005-02-16T13:31:14-0500, Steve Thompson wrote:
--- R.A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Property is like rights. We create it inherently, because we're human,
it
is not bestowed upon us by someone else. Particularly if that property
is
stolen from someone else at
Given the release of Palm Beach HIV+ patient information via
accidental attachment to a widely-distributed email, should agencies
with access to confidential information implement mandatory access
control and role-based security so that, barring problems with the
RBAC/MAC software, confidential
On 2005-02-21T22:40:03+0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Yes, complain to the Al-Q. node maintainer. The same code which strips my
digital signatures also wrap the lines.
Really?
http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=start=0scoring=denc_author=8NH-JhofCMh-TnQo0KXFjppET7C1dSi2gjvQCgNblIvwKtcqeQ;
On 2005-03-03T11:52:59+, ken wrote:
Chat is already higher volume (I read somewhere) in
raw quantity of messages sent than email.
I suspect you don't get much traffic. The beauty of a
non-real-time store-and-forward system like smtp (or SMS, or
oldstyle conferencing systems with
On 2005-03-06T00:03:01+0100, Anonymous wrote:
Ian Grigg writes at
http://www.financialcryptography.com/mt/archives/000381.html:
: Is this the end of an era, a defining cypherpunk moment?
It doesn't make much sense to renounce your U.S. citizenship if your
relatives, who you care about and who
On 2005-03-22T15:48:19+0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Link: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/21/1937206
Posted by: timothy, on 2005-03-21 23:11:00
from the if-you-have-nothing-to-hide dept.
[1]NevDull writes As creepy as it may be to deal with identity theft
from corporate
On 2005-03-26T11:04:46-0800, Eric Cordian wrote:
This just in from CNN:
[FBI agents have arrested a North Carolina man on suspicion of soliciting
offers over the Internet to kill Michael Schiavo and Judge Greer.
Richard Alan Meywes of Fairview is accused of offering $250,000 for the
1 - 100 of 235 matches
Mail list logo
