On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Tim May wrote:
I said many texts.
Which isn't the point, the point was 'bible'. You executed a strawman and
nobody seems to have noticed. Typical CACL.
Of course any word that exists is going to show up in 'many texts' if you
look hard enough. Your 'point' is specious.
to be only mildly interested in Wicca
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 08:39:57 -0600 (CST)
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Tim May wrote:
I said many texts.
Which isn't the point, the point was 'bible'. You executed a strawman and
nobody seems to have noticed. Typical CACL.
Of course any word that exists is going to show up
, I got 'plonked' by the King of the Anarchy for saying stuff he'd
already figured out 15 years ago.
-TD
From: Mike Rosing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Harmon Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CyberShamans who claim to be only mildly interested in Wicca
Date: Sat, 5 Apr
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Tim May wrote:
I said many texts.
Which isn't the point, the point was 'bible'. You executed a strawman and
nobody seems to have noticed. Typical CACL.
Of course any word that exists is going to show up in 'many texts' if you
look hard enough. Your 'point' is specious.
On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Harmon Seaver wrote:
I noticed, but arguing with Tim is rather pointless. If he tried to refute
primary sources with tertiary sources in a paper at any university he'd not only
get an F but probably some very nasty comments from the prof as well.
So when you're
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 08:39:57AM -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Tim May wrote:
I said many texts.
Which isn't the point, the point was 'bible'. You executed a strawman and
nobody seems to have noticed. Typical CACL.
I noticed, but arguing with Tim is rather pointless.
On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Harmon Seaver wrote:
I noticed, but arguing with Tim is rather pointless. If he tried to refute
primary sources with tertiary sources in a paper at any university he'd not only
get an F but probably some very nasty comments from the prof as well.
So when you're
