* Jack Lloyd:
http://theory.csail.mit.edu/~yiqun/shanote.pdf
Thanks for the pointer.
No real details, just collisions for 80 round SHA-0 (which I just confirmed)
and 58 round SHA-1 (which I haven't bothered with), plus the now famous work
factor estimate of 2^69 for full SHA-1.
As usual,
* Jack Lloyd:
http://theory.csail.mit.edu/~yiqun/shanote.pdf
Thanks for the pointer.
No real details, just collisions for 80 round SHA-0 (which I just confirmed)
and 58 round SHA-1 (which I haven't bothered with), plus the now famous work
factor estimate of 2^69 for full SHA-1.
As usual,
http://theory.csail.mit.edu/~yiqun/shanote.pdf
No real details, just collisions for 80 round SHA-0 (which I
just confirmed)
and 58 round SHA-1 (which I haven't bothered with), plus the
now famous work
factor estimate of 2^69 for full SHA-1.
As usual, Technical details will be
Yiqun L Yin writes 21 February 2005 about when the full SHA-1
paper will appear:
We have submitted the paper to a conference for peer review,
and we should receive a notification of the review results by early
May. We plan to publish the paper after incorporating the comments
from the
Yiqun L Yin writes 21 February 2005 about when the full SHA-1
paper will appear:
We have submitted the paper to a conference for peer review,
and we should receive a notification of the review results by early
May. We plan to publish the paper after incorporating the comments
from the
http://theory.csail.mit.edu/~yiqun/shanote.pdf
No real details, just collisions for 80 round SHA-0 (which I
just confirmed)
and 58 round SHA-1 (which I haven't bothered with), plus the
now famous work
factor estimate of 2^69 for full SHA-1.
As usual, Technical details will be
