At 1:04 PM -0800 2/14/03, Trei, Peter wrote:
This comes from another mailing list.
I've confirmed that it's not been reported on by
the NYT, the Washington Post, or the Boston Globe.
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0212-07.htm
FWIW - This speech was reprinted as an op-ed piece in today's
At 1:04 PM -0800 2/14/03, Trei, Peter wrote:
This comes from another mailing list.
I've confirmed that it's not been reported on by
the NYT, the Washington Post, or the Boston Globe.
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0212-07.htm
FWIW - This speech was reprinted as an op-ed piece in today's
At 05:49 PM 2/16/03 -0500, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Peter:
I think you're right. It's had some, spotty coverage:
http://news.google.com/news?hl=enq=%22robert+byrd%22+war+iraq+floorbtnG=Search+News
One reason why it may not have been picked up (speaking as a political
journalist, albeit not one
At least he's already opposing the unpatriot act II -- is anyone else?
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:30:16PM -0800, Mike Rosing wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Most outspoken? Wellstone voted for the Patriot Act. How about Feingold,
who was the lone dissenter, and is
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 05:58:07PM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
That's no joke. Remember what happened to the most outspoken
member of the Senate, Paul Wellstone. Funny they never came up for
any reason for that crash, eh? Tried to blame it on the weather, but
then all those other pilots
Peter:
I think you're right. It's had some, spotty coverage:
http://news.google.com/news?hl=enq=%22robert+byrd%22+war+iraq+floorbtnG=Search+News
One reason why it may not have been picked up (speaking as a political
journalist, albeit not one who writes about this area) is that it's
not
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 05:50:46PM -0500, Declan McCullagh wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 05:58:07PM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
That's no joke. Remember what happened to the most outspoken
member of the Senate, Paul Wellstone. Funny they never came up for
any reason for that crash, eh?
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Most outspoken? Wellstone voted for the Patriot Act. How about Feingold,
who was the lone dissenter, and is still alive and kicking?
That's because Feingold voted *for* Ashcroft in the Judiciary committee.
He could have voted him down (along party
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 05:50:46PM -0500, Declan McCullagh wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 05:58:07PM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
That's no joke. Remember what happened to the most outspoken
member of the Senate, Paul Wellstone. Funny they never came up for
any reason for that crash, eh?
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 05:58:07PM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
That's no joke. Remember what happened to the most outspoken
member of the Senate, Paul Wellstone. Funny they never came up for
any reason for that crash, eh? Tried to blame it on the weather, but
then all those other pilots
The statement is real, it may not have been from the floor tho:
http://byrd.senate.gov/byrd_newsroom/byrd_news_feb/news_2003_february/news_2003_february_9.html
Thanks, I'll send this to Feingold and see if he'll try to
get a vote or motion going to force the executive to justify
it's actions.
On Friday, February 14, 2003, at 01:04 PM, Trei, Peter wrote:
Reckless Administration May Reap Disastrous Consequences
by US Senator Robert Byrd
Senate Floor Speech - Wednesday, February 12, 2003
To contemplate war is to think about the most horrible of human
experiences.
On this February
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:29:57PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
About Byrd's speech, he is protected by the same Bush doctrine. If a
less powerful person made these charges, he'd face a talking to by
the FBI. And after PATRIOT II passes with an overwhelming majority, but
after no debate, he'd
This comes from another mailing list.
I've confirmed that it's not been reported on by
the NYT, the Washington Post, or the Boston Globe.
Peter Trei
--
From: Dave Farber[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:52 PM
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Tim May wrote:
We live in fascist times.
People are fascist, not the times.
Read your own posts sometime.
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going
The statement is real, it may not have been from the floor tho:
http://byrd.senate.gov/byrd_newsroom/byrd_news_feb/news_2003_february/news_2003_february_9.html
Thanks, I'll send this to Feingold and see if he'll try to
get a vote or motion going to force the executive to justify
it's actions.
This comes from another mailing list.
I've confirmed that it's not been reported on by
the NYT, the Washington Post, or the Boston Globe.
Peter Trei
--
From: Dave Farber[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:52 PM
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:29:57PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
About Byrd's speech, he is protected by the same Bush doctrine. If a
less powerful person made these charges, he'd face a talking to by
the FBI. And after PATRIOT II passes with an overwhelming majority, but
after no debate, he'd
18 matches
Mail list logo
