On Tuesday 29 October 2002 19:34, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga
Remailer wrote:
What technology is available to create a 2048-bit RSA key pair so
that:
2 - no one knows the secret part,
3 - The secret part is kept in the box and it is safe as long as
the box is physically secured
On Tuesday, October 29, 2002, at 04:34 PM, Anonymous via the
Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote:
(possible duplicate message)
What technology is available to create a 2048-bit RSA key pair so that:
1 - the randomness comes from quantum noise
Clicks from a Geiger Counter, Johnson noise, etc.
At 03:35 PM 10/30/2002 +0100, Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of jamming, I've thought for a long time that a
portable jamming device would be very nice to have. Something
that jammed *all* frequencies, or at least everything from
10 or maybe 6 meters on up, to a range of a mile or
At 07:28 PM 10/29/02 -0500, Brian McWilliams wrote:
At 04:34 PM 10/28/2002, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
The e-mails were obtained earlier this month
by guessing the
login name and password
Did that Wired reporter just admit to a crime?
http://wired.com/news/conflict/0,2100,55967,00.html
What if
At 07:53 AM 10/30/02 -0800, Steve Schear wrote:
At 03:35 PM 10/30/2002 +0100, Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of jamming, I've thought for a long time that a
portable jamming device would be very nice to have.
Frequencies don't get jammed, specific communications channels between
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Adam Shostack wrote:
(Changing the rules on a regular basis has some security value, as it
makes it likely that plans will be ruined. But it has the cost that
passengers can't plan..)
Some animals are more equal than others. It's interesting to look back in
these past
http://lwn.net/Articles/14006/
Linus has yet to post a message to linux-kernel since his return, but he
continues to merge patches at a high rate. The latest code to go in
includes a new, reworked API for the performance of cryptographic
functions within the kernel; implementations of DES (and
South Dakota measure backs 'nullification' -
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-jury30oct30.story
At 06:56 AM 10/30/2002 -0800, you wrote:
South Dakota measure backs 'nullification' -
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-jury30oct30.story
See also:
http://www.ncpa.org/iss/leg/2002/pd082702b.html
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v02/n1591/a01.html?999
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Steve Schear wrote:
At 03:35 PM 10/30/2002 +0100, Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of jamming, I've thought for a long time that a
portable jamming device would be very nice to have. Something
that jammed *all* frequencies, or at least everything from
10 or
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:32:17AM -0500, Sunder wrote:
| It's interesting to see how much stuff that was in the interest of
| national security being declassified and available after 50 years. Lots
| of cool stuff on the history channel lately. I wonder what evil will
| surface fifty years
Some comments on this paper comparing efficiency, and functionality
with Camenisch, Chaum, Brands.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:49:21PM +, Jason Holt wrote:
http://eprint.iacr.org/2002/151/
It mentions how to use the blinding technique Ben Laurie describes
in his Lucre paper, which I don't
12 matches
Mail list logo
