Adam Stenseth wrote:
Just for my own edification, does this apply to
landline service as well(or other government-sanctioned
monopolies)? For example, are your calling habits and
landline number assets of your phone company? Many of them
seem to think so.
Yes, they are. Just as
Technological solutions are preferable over statist solutions (which don't
usually even work, as the statists write the rules and exempt themselves and
their friends).
Ya know Tim May, you say a lotta crazy shit but every now and then you say
something that really makes some sense.
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 10:56:14AM -0800, Morlock Elloi wrote:
But we will always have phone booths and acoustic couplers.
Not around Boston. I got attacked by a script kiddie with the
kloged trojan on Thanksgiving morning at 5 AM and had occasion to need
to make a couple of out of
Jamie Lawrence wrote:
Jim, you post enough crap from Slashdot to know
differently. People
are doing it. I have a whitebox machine (AMD, 256M ram, cheap TV
card, 20G disk, $300 a year ago) that does it. It isn't a
big deal.
Speaking of posting crap...and don't send me private
At 11:38 PM 12/06/2002 -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
You should have tried this back in the late 80's with a single frame VHS
recorder and an Amiga Video Toaster...one frame at a time, thank god for
AREXX ;)
If you were actually using the Video Toaster, and not just the Amiga's CPU,
you had what
On Saturday, December 7, 2002, at 06:20 PM, Lucky Green wrote:
Harmon Seaver wrote:
Tim mentioned cell phones and the lack of telemarketing
calls on his, but really that's only because, at this point
at least, the cellphone number lists haven't been sold. This
might change in the near
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Tim May wrote:
Frankly, millions of these fascists need a simple solution: a tree, a
horse, and a rope.
There aren't enough horses :-)
Patience, persistence, truth,
Dr. mike
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 06:20:02PM -0800, Lucky Green wrote:
Harmon Seaver wrote:
Tim mentioned cell phones and the lack of telemarketing
calls on his, but really that's only because, at this point
at least, the cellphone number lists haven't been sold. This
might change in the near
An example from my day yesterday...
I have two 'cheap boxes', one from nation wide chain store (who sells
things other than high tech and appliances, a wall to wall mart if you
will) and one from a local Austin vendor. The behavior was checked
against multiple instances of boxes so we know it
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Jamie Lawrence wrote:
On Sat, 07 Dec 2002, Lucky Green wrote:
It never ceases to amaze me that there are subscribers to this list that
don't have Choate filtered. This must be some weird list to read without
a Choate procmail filter...
Yes, my mistake. I've seen
jet wrote:
At 20:48 -0500 2002/12/07, Myers W. Carpenter wrote:
http://www.2600.com/news/display/display.shtml?id=1441
PHOTOGRAPHER ARRESTED FOR TAKING PICTURES OF VICE PRESIDENT'S HOTEL
Posted 5 Dec 2002 06:03:48 UTC
One major issue is these days, the laws have become so
incredibly
11 matches
Mail list logo
