On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:11:26PM -0600, Wes Hellman wrote:
Since terrorists are the enemy, and they (obviously) operate within our
borders to do harm, it's not a terrible stretch to think that it won't
be long before a US citizen who's actually here in the states could be
designated an enemy
At 09:58 AM 1/9/03 -0800, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20030106-75579570.htm
---
Greets to the TLA moths flitting to the flame of keywords..
Though the article would be better if it had named the former NJ Governor
Thomas H. Kean instead of David H.
On 9 Jan 2003, lcs Mixmaster Remailer wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 12:35:38 -0500, you wrote:
No they don't; or they wouldn't have had the balls to stop the car in
the first place.
Most cops in Cookeville, TN have dogs. I wonder if they would
mind them being shotgunned to death. If the
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003 07:13:31 -0800 (PST)
Mike Rosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The dealer said it's a rolling code system, and from
the white paper this includes a 40 bit challenge, an
encryption operation on the key (!) then a 24 bit
response from the key.
Hi Mike,
do you have an actual
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 12:35:38 -0500, you wrote:
No they don't; or they wouldn't have had the balls to stop the car in the
first place.
Most cops in Cookeville, TN have dogs. I wonder if they would
mind them being shotgunned to death. If the dog presents a
threat of any type like running up
Here's a December ruling favorable to the gvt in the Padilla case:
http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/12/04/padilla.ruling/index.html
Note this has not been affirmed by an appeals court (yet).
-Declan
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:25:42PM -0600, Wes Hellman wrote:
Oh, it seems that I've missed the fact
At 9:17 AM -0800 on 1/9/03, Bill Stewart wrote:
I've usually been the one wearing the fedora in cooler weather,
and a few people wore Red Hats back in the day.
Don't ever do it without your fez on?
:-).
Cheers,
RAH
Not that a fez would work very well for that kind of thing. Well, not
*that*
This is worth a laugh. I have never before heard of or seen a hacker as
bad as this one. Oh my.
http://www.andrews.af.mil/89cg/89cs/scbsi/images/poster8.jpg
Yours
Bo Elkjaer, Denmark
--
EOT
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, blah wrote:
From: Jim Choate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, blah wrote:
Not from the photons perspective, from a photons perspective there is
-no- time.
A photon has no perspective.
Yes it does. It is a particle and it interacts with the rest of
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Anonymous wrote:
As a (fellow) trained physicst, do you actually believe that
quantum-encrypted signals are truly secure as a byproduct of basic
physical law, or do even YOU believe that QM is merely a useful
calculational tool,
No 'label' is ever the thing it labels. QM
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Tim May wrote:
-- Newcomb's Paradox (discussed in Pearl, Joyce, Nozick, etc.)
This is no paradox, it is a silly question with an obvious answer that a
lot of smart people have wasted a lot of time over.
You mug the alien and take both boxes. Hence if the alien could
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, blah wrote:
Blah wrote quite an excellent post. In fact, I've met few physics PhDs
which would have been able to respond so well. So needless to say, my
curiosity is peaked concerning who Blah is in the real world. (Tim May,
Thanks. It's nice to run into
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann wrote:
do you have an actual specification of the algorithm used by the rolling
code system or is that just another ingenious high-level whitepaper
leaving out all the nice details ?
No nice details, just whitepaper blurbs. That's why I'm asking!
I
michael cardenas wrote:
What was the bit length of the rsa key that they factored?
I probably should have highlighted this with more than an Oh my at the
end of the exerpt, but the point of the quote was to poke some fun at the
legendary ability of the British IT Press to get breaking computer
Major Variola wrote...
Reference). Of course, the Bhagavad Gita is a subsection of the
Maybe your highschool has firewalled off anything that will lead
you to Hoffman, Ott, Huxley, etc.
Yeah, read all a lot of that shit 25 years ago. Seems easier to ask in an
email while making some
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
I'd also point out the need to be deliberately oblique. I'm not sure we
aren't actually headed towards a time where any of us can be carted away for
expressing how we really think. I also don't kid myself about whether
someone could be listening. And
At 12:14 PM 01/10/2003 +0100, Bo Elkjaer wrote:
This is worth a laugh. I have never before heard of or seen a hacker as
bad as this one. Oh my.
http://www.andrews.af.mil/89cg/89cs/scbsi/images/poster8.jpg
Obviously the artist had been playing Quake or Ultima Online or whatever
and just gotten
Some guy wrote
You are moron.
Care to be a little more specific? (I'm not afraid of a little criticism,
particularly if its constructive.)
Even if true, I don't see how that comment pertains to my reply.
For all I know, I've been posting on a list haunted by a bunch of
crypto-white
18 matches
Mail list logo
