Re: MPAA files new film-swapping suits

At 04:41 PM 1/28/05 +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote: >Not really. The P2P assm^H^H^H^H architects are reissuing new systems with >holes patched reactively. There's no reason for a P2P system designed in 1996 >to be water-tight to any threat model of 2010. (Strangely enough, they had >IP nazis and lawyers

Re: MPAA files new film-swapping suits

On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 10:16:44AM -0500, Tyler Durden wrote: > That's an interesting point. They seem to be "attacking" at precisely the > correct rate to forcibly evolve P2P systems to be completely invulnerable > to such efforts. Not really. The P2P assm^H^H^H^H architects are reissuing new

Re: MPAA files new film-swapping suits

PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MPAA files new film-swapping suits Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:59:15 + > <http://news.com.com/2102-1030_3-5551903.html?tag=st.util.print> > > Hollywood studios filed a second round of lawsuits against online > movie-swappers on Wednes

Re: MPAA files new film-swapping suits

> > > Hollywood studios filed a second round of lawsuits against online > movie-swappers on Wednesday, stepping up legal pressure on the file-trading > community. As much as I'd like to be upset, they are driving innovation of p2p s