On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Anonymous wrote:
> I hope you are not letting the ends justify the means. As
> someone here wrote it's just not right to even do a reverse
> panopticon on the feebs who are building the total information
> awareness surveillance on us.
>
> To do othewise would be failing to w
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> But why doing it in the first place? To contaminate an area, causing high
> costs for decontamination? Doesn't compute. Unless you just want to annoy.
> If you want to kill people, stick to nerve agents. Maximum impact
> (relatively volatile, excellent LD5
--
Tim wrote:
> > Expect to hear not of a hausfrau being busted, but of the
> > roundup (so to speak) of Mohammed Sayeed, Hariq Azaz, and
> > other thought criminals for buying two many gallons of
> > Roundup at the local Walmart.
On 24 Dec 2002 at 19:42, Anonymous wrote:
> Not all that far
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 19:42:23 +0100 (CET), you wrote:
>
> Tim wrote:
>
> > Expect to hear not of a hausfrau being busted, but of the roundup (so
> > to speak) of Mohammed Sayeed, Hariq Azaz, and other thought criminals
> > for buying two many gallons of Roundup at the local Walmart.
>
>Not all t
Tim wrote:
> Expect to hear not of a hausfrau being busted, but of the roundup (so
> to speak) of Mohammed Sayeed, Hariq Azaz, and other thought criminals
> for buying two many gallons of Roundup at the local Walmart.
Not all that far-fetched, really. It would be fairly simple to create a
dio
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, James A. Donald wrote:
> On 24 Dec 2002 at 19:42, Anonymous wrote:
> > Not all that far-fetched, really. It would be fairly simple
> > to create a dioxin bomb by heating a 55gal drum of
> > polychlorinated phenols (2,4D or 2,45T) or polychlorinated
> > biphenols (PCBs from a p
