Re: all about transferable off-line ecash (Re: Brands off-line tech)

2002-04-11 Thread Anonymous
[By forwarding this mail to the DBS list, Robert Hettinga agrees that he is an arrogant, obnoxious, power-hungry asshole with no moral integrity whatsoever.] Adam Back wrote: On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 06:17:06PM +0200, Anonymous wrote: And second, because the deposit is unlinkable to the

R.A. as A.J. (was Re: all about transferable off-line ecash (Re: Brands off-line tech))

2002-04-11 Thread R. A. Hettinga
At 8:30 AM +0200 on 4/11/02, Anonymous exfumed out of Vienna again: [By forwarding this mail to the DBS list, Done... Robert Hettinga agrees that he is an arrogant, Check... obnoxious, Check... power-hungry Check... asshole Walter-Brennan-as-Stinky-Pete Now yew wait jes' a

Re: all about transferable off-line ecash (Re: Brands off-line tech)

2002-04-10 Thread Mike Rosing
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Adam Back wrote: You don't need the minter's secret key to identify the double-spender. Anyone who happens to see two coin transcripts answering different challenges with the same coin private key can recover all the attributes of the coin, including the identity

Re: all about transferable off-line ecash (Re: Brands off-line tech)

2002-04-10 Thread Adam Back
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:47:51PM -0700, Morlock Elloi wrote: In the smart card setting with Brands protocols there is a host computer (eg pda, laptop, mobile-phone main processor, desktop) and a tamper-resistant smart-card which computes part of the coin transfer and prevents

Re: all about transferable off-line ecash (Re: Brands off-line tech)

2002-04-10 Thread Mike Rosing
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Adam Back wrote: Is there anything specific PKILAB have said about Brands certs? No, it was early in the set up when it was discussed. Sounds like they want to at least listen to him :-) btw I did a google search for PKILAB and Brands to see if I could find anything

Re: all about transferable off-line ecash (Re: Brands off-line tech)

2002-04-09 Thread Adam Back
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:52:32PM -0700, Mike Rosing wrote: While I agree with goal, it's not clear to me that it's physically possible. What makes money useful is it's physical existance, people have been counterfiting coins since they were invented but it's been getting harder to do.

Re: all about transferable off-line ecash (Re: Brands off-line tech)

2002-04-09 Thread Anonymous
[Copied to Adam so he doesn't have to wait for some moderator to get off his fat ass and approve it. And BTW permission is NOT granted to forward this or any part of it to the DBS list because Hettinga is an asshole who kicks people off his list for spite. He can piss in his own sandbox if he

Re: all about transferable off-line ecash (Re: Brands off-line tech)

2002-04-09 Thread Ken Brown
Adam Back wrote: [...snip...] Another example would be having to give a deposit to get mobile phone for people with poor credit ratings. Also in Europe pay as you go, cash only mobile phone usage is popular due to credit elegibility reasons also I think. You can plunk down a 10 pound note

Burroughs' Revenge (was Re: all about transferable off-line ecash (Re: Brands off-line tech))

2002-04-09 Thread R. A. Hettinga
At 8:37 AM +0200 on 4/9/02, Some Anonymous Flatualist emitted the following bit of flammable gas out of an Austrian remailer somewhere: And BTW permission is NOT granted to forward this or any part of it to the DBS list because Hettinga is an asshole who kicks people off his list for spite.

Re: all about transferable off-line ecash (Re: Brands off-line tech)

2002-04-09 Thread Anonymous
Ben Laurie wrote: Anonymous wrote: It's not just an extra feature; an off-line system inherently requires users to identify themselves to the bank at withdrawal time. It cannot allow users to anonymously exchange coins at the bank. So it has an inherent lack of anonymity which is not

Re: all about transferable off-line ecash (Re: Brands off-line tech)

2002-04-09 Thread georgemw
On 9 Apr 2002 at 16:54, Ken Brown wrote: But paper money is such a 20th-century thing! These days we're slowly drifting back to higher value metal coins (2 pounds out for a few years now, 5 pounds coming soon I think). Much more fun. Feels like real treasure! Less of the floppy stuff, we

RE: all about transferable off-line ecash (Re: Brands off-line tech)

2002-04-09 Thread Jim Dixon
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Trei, Peter wrote: I was living in Britain (and of an allowance-recieving age) when decimalization occured. While we lost the big penny, we gained the 50p piece. In those days, it was a large, heavy, seven-sided coin, bigger than a US half-dollar, and worth $1.20. It

Re: all about transferable off-line ecash (Re: Brands off-line tech)

2002-04-09 Thread Faustine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Rosing[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Ken Brown wrote: I'd rather have stiff cards than floppy paper ones. At least you can put them into the slot of a machine easily. But with an RF tag you'd not even have to pull it out

Re: all about transferable off-line ecash (Re: Brands off-line tech)

2002-04-09 Thread A. Melon
Peter Trei writes: Speaking for myself and a few friends and relations, we'd be perfectly happy to use them, if they were available. A good place to get Sacagawea dollars is from the stamp machine at your local post office. Put in a $20 bill and buy as small an amount of stamps as you can,

Re: all about transferable off-line ecash (Re: Brands off-line tech)

2002-04-08 Thread Anonymous
The issue with off-line cash is this: has the coin being offered already been spent? With on-line cash, the offered coin is immediately deposited at the bank, hence doubly-spent coins are detected instantly. With off-line cash this cannot be done because by definition there is no connection to