The problem might be the resultant emf signature, much more of a giveaway than the
brief activity of a digital camera.
What really might be useful is steganographically placing it on the back of some
bulshit cellphone call (not likely to arouse much suspicion these days)
j
- Original Text
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:56:29PM -0800, Richard Crisp wrote:
hmm, it seems to me that video riding in a stegano fashion on a cell phone
call would exceed the bandwidth capability of the channel. It's one thing to
send a single image steganographically on a cell call, but it is another to
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 09:32:48PM -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
Any chance this is the same Dave Emery who does the radio broadcasts? (I
listen from WFMU). If so, man! If a tiny fraction of the stuff you have
said over the years is true, well...brrr. A good example is Los Amigos de
]
Subject: Re: Fw: RE:Confiscation of Anti-War Video
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:29:13 -0500
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:56:29PM -0800, Richard Crisp wrote:
hmm, it seems to me that video riding in a stegano fashion on a cell
phone
call would exceed the bandwidth capability of the channel. It's one
