At 04:38 PM 08/17/2003 -0400, Tim Meehan wrote:
The CIA's official explanation of the event, even to this layman, is
aerodynamically impossible. Let me say that the TWA 800 coverup has a lot
to do
with my cynicism about what really happened on 9/11.
The Feds spent a lot of time saying "We haven't
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 03:04:53PM -0400, Trei, Peter wrote:
> Both of these these stories lack plausibility as far as I'm concerned.
> 2. WTC: If you have the ability to insert tower-busting bombs into
> the WTC towers, why the hell would you go to the trouble of doing the
> plane thing? It tooks
Could you turn that into an mp3 and email a url to it?
--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
+ ^ + :25Kliters anthrax, 38K liters botulinum toxin, 500 tons of /|\
\|/ :sarin, mustard and VX gas, mobile bio-weapons labs, nukular /\|/\
<--*-->:weapons.. Reas
> > Tyler Durden said:
> >
> > >Most people in this neck of the woods continue to believe that that
> flight
> > >that went down over Long Island a few years ago was actually shot
> > >down...many witnesses saw a rocket go up and hit the plane.
> > >The government, of course, denies it. God forb
Tyler Durden said:
>Most people in this neck of the woods continue to believe that that flight
>that went down over Long Island a few years ago was actually shot
>down...many witnesses saw a rocket go up and hit the plane.
>The government, of course, denies it. God forbid the airlines collapse.
Reports today that commercial aviation is in dire danger of being
grounded as freedom fighters deploy even a small fraction of the
(estimated) 750,000 shoulder-fired missiles to down commercial
airliners.
(Having sat on Pacific Coast Highway below the takeoff path of LAX
jumbo jets, I can atte
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 07:15 PM, Steve Furlong wrote:
On Thursday 07 August 2003 20:52, Tim May wrote:
Any van with a moonroof could trivially be
set up to allow a pop shot
Backblast. A suicide shooter could do it, but it would be non-trivial
to
pop out, shoot, survive it, and keep you
Steve Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Backblast. A suicide shooter could do it, but it would be non-trivial to
> pop out, shoot, survive it, and keep your van's paint good enough to
> avoid notice.
This is why "soft launch" systems were created.
http://web.jfet.org/video/JavelLiveFireVsT72
No, no, no. This is all planned. After all, how can you have a war on
terrorism in order to clamp down on freedoms, if there is no terror? How
can you incite patriotism and support of the government? How else can you
bring about the police state?
And while you're at it, you can make most peo
At 10:15 PM 08/07/2003 -0400, Steve Furlong wrote:
On Thursday 07 August 2003 20:52, Tim May wrote:
> Any van with a moonroof could trivially be
> set up to allow a pop shot
Backblast. A suicide shooter could do it, but it would be non-trivial to
pop out, shoot, survive it, and keep your van's pai
10 matches
Mail list logo
