At 12:24 PM 10/17/05 -0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
>Soon we'll find out that toothbrushes are able to determine what I ate for
>dinner and are regularly sending the info...
Soon there will be sensors in urinals that page the DEA..
So this dupe/spy/wannabe journalist thinks that journalists
should be *special*.. how nice. Where in the 1st amendment is the class
journalists mentioned? She needs a WMD enema.
LAS VEGAS (AP) -- New York Times reporter Judith Miller defended her
decision to go to jail to protect a source and
> Just presented at ICETE2005 by Daniel Nagy:
>
> http://www.epointsystem.org/~nagydani/ICETE2005.pdf
>
> Abstract. In present paper a novel approach to on-line payment is
> presented that tackles some issues of digital cash that have, in the
> author s opinion, contributed to the fact that d
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:27:53PM -0700, cyphrpunk wrote:
> > Just presented at ICETE2005 by Daniel Nagy:
> >
> > http://www.epointsystem.org/~nagydani/ICETE2005.pdf
>
> This is a thorough and careful paper but the system has no blinding
> and so payments are traceable and linkable. The standar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My understanding is that she only went to jail because of a federal law
passed in the early 80's designed to protect undercover federal agents.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I was under the impression that were it
not for that law, there would be no
Unfortunately, it's not as simple as protecting a source.
Most shield laws, or proposed shield laws, as I understand them,
protect a journalist from revealing a source who is exposing
wrongdoing that is in the public interest. This is not the same
thing. The act of leaking the identity of Ms. Pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You're just trolling, right?
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to p
> On 10/19/05, Chris Clymer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You're just trolling, right?
[snip]
> Major Variola (ret.) wrote:
>
>>So this dupe/spy/wannabe journalist thinks that journalists
>>should be *special*.. how nice. Where in the 1st amendment is the class
>>journalists mentioned? She n
Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
On 2005-10-19T19:59:18+, Gil Hamilton wrote:
>
> Reporters should have no rights the rest of us don't have. It's hard to
> imagine the framers of the constitution approving an amendment that said
> freedom of the press is granted to all those who first apply
Dave Howe wrote:
Gil Hamilton wrote:
> The problem is that reporters want to be made into a special class of
> people that don't have to abide by the same laws as the rest of us. Are
> you a reporter? Am I? Is the National Inquirer? How about Drudge?
> What about bloggers? Which agency will
On 2005-10-19T10:37:55-0700, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> Previous Politech message:
> http://www.politechbot.com/2005/10/17/barney-lawyer-recommends/
> Responses:
> http://www.politechbot.com/2005/10/19/more-on-barney/
Some of the first-round responses mentioned the iniquities involved in
attacking
Gil Hamilton wrote:
> The problem is that reporters want to be made into a special class of
> people that don't have to abide by the same laws as the rest of us. Are
> you a reporter? Am I? Is the National Inquirer? How about Drudge?
> What about bloggers? Which agency will you have to apply
On 2005-10-19T19:59:18+, Gil Hamilton wrote:
>
> Reporters should have no rights the rest of us don't have. It's hard to
> imagine the framers of the constitution approving an amendment that said
> freedom of the press is granted to all those who first apply for and
> receive permission fr
13 matches
Mail list logo
