On Saturday, December 21, 2002, at 02:57 AM, Sarad AV wrote:
hi,
"Be the change you wish to see in the world"
-Mahatma Gandhi
So how we gonna change the world dude?
Arise the masses,how he did that-I have no clue.How
ever he did that in the 1940's when the only method of
mass communicati
On Saturday, December 21, 2002, at 10:07 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2002/1217/1
Policing Bioterror Research
One of science's hottest fields is now becoming one of its most heavily
regulated, too. The U.S. government last week unveiled sweeping new
On Saturday 21 December 2002 08:45 am, Anonymous wrote:
>
> The high ranking for power concentration you implicity give to
> transnationals is undeserved and you are fearful of the wrong
> threat. The humblest meter maid can commence a process against
> you with consequences far greater than those
http://www.speakfreely.org/ is a nice, open-source cross-platfor VoIP
software. Supports encryption by DES, Blowfish, and IDEA.
Had anyone knowledgeable ever looked at its code? How secure this
implementation is? Is better to use Blowfish or IDEA? Where are the
potential holes there?
> I was curious what the status of the SMS encryption project quoted in the below post
>is?
> I did some googling and saw almost nothing on the subject.
Newer GSM phones have java engines, used for ie. downloadable games.
Shouldn't it be possible to write a SMS encryption/decryption software in
J
On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 04:48 PM, Michael Cardenas wrote:
Tim May wrote:
Remailers and Web proxies work in ways that skirt this "transparency"
of MACs and routing that you are referring to. These are the types of
technologies we are discussing. The fact that Disney or Lockheed may
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 07:40:34PM +0100, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
|
| http://www.speakfreely.org/ is a nice, open-source cross-platfor VoIP
| software. Supports encryption by DES, Blowfish, and IDEA.
|
| Had anyone knowledgeable ever looked at its code? How secure this
| implementation is? Is bett
Snort, guffaw!
Matthew X wrote:
> "With the full backing and support by the US, President Arroyo as the
> commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of the Philippines has unleashed a
> most brutal war against progressive and militant forces.
"progressive" = Communist
"militant" = terrorist
Marc d
--
William Warren
> voting keeps you free..voting is our way of controlling and
> shaping the government.
In
http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Academic/Price_Theory/PThy_Chapter_19/PT
hy_Chap_19.html
David Friedman explains why democracy does not work.
--digsig
James A. Donald
hi,
> > "Be the change you wish to see in the world"
> > -Mahatma Gandhi
> So how we gonna change the world dude?
Arise the masses,how he did that-I have no clue.How
ever he did that in the 1940's when the only method of
mass communication was radio(british controlled) and
new paper(again brit
hi,
>Nothing serious, just throwing a quick thought out...
>It has been mentioned that you should always use
>crypto. If you wait
>until
>you actually have something private to send, then an
>adversary will
>know
>exactly which message is important.
Don't encrypt,post it by snail mail.I rememb
--
On 20 Dec 2002 at 19:26, William Warren wrote:
> voting keeps you free..voting is our way of controlling and
> shaping the government.
No matter who you vote for, a politician always gets elected.
> Those who do not exercise this duty do not deserve to
> complain about what goes on.
By v
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 00:07:34 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
>
> Michael Cardenas wrote:
>
> (Begin Quote)
> I'm curious as to what makes you, or anyone on this list, think that these
>technologies by themselves will cause any sort of political upheaval...What's to
>say that these technologies are no
Michael Cardenas wrote:
(Begin Quote)
I'm curious as to what makes you, or anyone on this list, think that these
technologies by themselves will cause any sort of political upheaval...What's to
say that these technologies are not going to be shaped to meet the needs and wants of
the transna
Tim May wrote:
On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 12:34 PM, Michael Cardenas wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Like I said before, P2P, Crypto, WiFi and cheap chips will turn
everything upside down.
I'm curious as to what makes you, or anyone on this list, think that
these technologies by themselves
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Trei, Peter wrote:
> I think you meant the *Beretta* family, who
> have been making fine fireams since the 1520's.
Yup, my spelling sucks :-)
> Other really old companies:
>
> Stora Enso Oyj of Helsinki, Finland, a
> paper and board maker, began as a
> copper mine in central
> Mike Rosing[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote
[...]
> The Berrata family is still around,
> mostly because they never decided
> to be a _political_ power. They
> have stayed as an economic one.
[...]
I think you meant the *Beretta* family, who
have been making fine fireams since the 1520's.
Othe
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> Ahh... I meant massive military might.
Not a whole lot of difference usually :-)
mike
On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 12:34 PM, Michael Cardenas wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Like I said before, P2P, Crypto, WiFi and cheap chips will turn
everything upside down.
I'm curious as to what makes you, or anyone on this list, think that
these technologies by themselves will cause any so
--
> > Disney doesn't have the power to tell me what I may eat or
> > smoke, except in their parks and on their property.
On 20 Dec 2002 at 10:24, Vincent Penquerc'h wrote:
> Now, imagine a Disney owning the whole of the land of the
> USA, and having armed forces the size of the USA.
If a sin
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 12:50:57PM -0800, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> Tim May wrote:
> >(Much has been made of how the Microsoft- and Intel-backed security
> >regimes will be "opt in" or "voluntary." This seems dubious. It is
> >precisely the non-volunteers who these companies, and Hollywood, and
At 10:27 AM 12/20/02 -0800, Mike Rosing wrote:
>
>Also check out "The Art of War" where Sun Tzu describes using
>signals to confuse the enemy. We're not doing anything new here,
>the toys are just more fun to play with is all :-)
The moral equivalent of the pre-telegraph French semaphore soldiers
Mike Rosing wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Michael Cardenas wrote:
I just have a hard time seeing the bridge between armed rebellion
against the largest military power the world has ever known, the U.S.,
and some new networking technologies that are being designed for cisco
to make more money. Ev
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> I think that Bruce Schneier's terse comment just illustrates the
> flippant attitude that lots of geeks have towards politics, and that
> lots of people have also. Just because geeks know a lot about
> technology, doesn't mean that they're impervious
All (esp. lucky) -
I was curious what the status of the SMS encryption project quoted in the below post
is?
I did some googling and saw almost nothing on the subject.
thanks
* To: Multiple recipients of list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Subject: Re: AUCRYPTO: RE: Cellular Phone Anonymity/Pri
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
> The moral equivalent of the pre-telegraph French semaphore soldiers
> doing the macarena...
> :-)
To the tune of "I'm a lumberjack and I'm ok".
:-)
Patience, persistence, truth,
Dr. mike
Anonymous wrote:
Like I said before, P2P, Crypto, WiFi and cheap chips will turn everything upside down.
I'm curious as to what makes you, or anyone on this list, think that
these technologies by themselves will cause any sort of political
upheaval. Lawrence Lessig has talked about how tec
>>>Ultimately, what we need is encrypted voice. <<<
Al Quaida sure do.Dragon speaking has some Drs and lawyers packages,so
maybe they have a crypto option.A local Dr here had his laptop seized
recently so I imagine there is at least a small market.
http://www.dragontalk.com/ORDERINFO.htm
I'll wr
"It has been mentioned that you should always use crypto. If you wait until you
actually have something private to send, then an adversary will know exactly which
message is important."
Or, alternatively, if Crypto use by "everyday folks" was as common as, saying,
Gnutella file sharing, then i
On Friday 20 December 2002 06:26 pm, William Warren wrote:
> voting keeps you free..voting is our way of controlling and shaping the
> government. Those who do not exercise this duty do not deserve to
> complain about what goes on. I used to be in the non-voting
> category..then i stopped and ste
At 6:11 PM -0800 on 12/12/02, Lucky Green wrote:
> Agreed. A few years ago, some would advocate that on the Internet,
> no national laws apply. This was, of course, nonsense. Instead,
> every single national, regional, and local law in effect today
> anywhere in the world applies to anything you do
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> I'm not advocating armed rebellion. I'm saying that the current
> political structures in power have massive political might and are
> willing to use it to stay in power, as we are witnessing more everyday,
> and anything that challenges that might wi
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
> Very good, sir. Your next assignment is to read about Mixmaster
> anonymous remailer networks. Generally sending uniformly-sized (padded
> or fragmented or noise) blocks at regular intervals is preferable (and
> equivalent)
> to your suggestion o
voting keeps you free..voting is our way of controlling and shaping the
government. Those who do not exercise this duty do not deserve to
complain about what goes on. I used to be in the non-voting
category..then i stopped and stepped out of life and looked at hte
gov't..and did not like it..
Michael Cardenas wrote:
I'm not advocating armed rebellion. I'm saying that the current
political structures in power have massive political might and are
willing to use it to stay in power, as we are witnessing more
everyday, and anything that challenges that might will eventually have
to fa
From: "Jim Choate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Freedom -is- Security.
Wake him up! Jim got one thing right, we can't have that. It ruins our
filtering.
Mark
At 01:43 PM 12/20/02 -0800, Mike Rosing wrote:
> I
>don't see Nero as that much different than W, other than W's
>mom isn't gonna get offed like Nero's was. She's smarter than
>her son is :-)
Not necessarily. Nero's mom didn't have SS agents watching her and
PaBush for life.
--
"Intended only
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 10:10:25PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Nothing serious, just throwing a quick thought out...
|
| It has been mentioned that you should always use crypto. If you wait until
| you actually have something private to send, then an adversary will know
| exactly which messa
From: "Vincent Penquerc'h" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Disney doesn't have the power to tell me what I may eat or smoke,
> > except in their parks and on their property.
>
> [snip]
>
> Now, imagine a Disney owning the whole of the land of the USA,
> and having armed forces the size of the USA.
> At le
At 03:01 PM 12/20/02 -0600, Anonymous wrote:
>Or, alternatively, if Crypto use by "everyday folks" was as common as,
saying, Gnutella file sharing, then it would be a HELL of a lot harder
for invisible ears to pick out potentially interesting encrypted files
(how many Gnutella files are shared each
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 10:35:06AM -0800, Mike Rosing wrote:
> > onto the radar of U.S. legislators, who see the danger it poses to the
> > traditional power structures. Unless all those free software programmers
> > are prepared for armed rebellion when their right to share code is taken
> > away,
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Anonymous wrote:
> And I wonder...with international companies now cracking down on
> "Power-Users" of networks like Gnutella, one would think that
> building-in some crypto capabilities (say into Kazaa) could be
> something "regular" people might be willing to pay for. (Or, a
Nothing serious, just throwing a quick thought out...
It has been mentioned that you should always use crypto. If you wait until
you actually have something private to send, then an adversary will know
exactly which message is important. Encrypting everything gives equal
suspicion to each message
>>> My intuition is that the government is going to be slightly fairer
>>> than,
>>> for example, Disney. That's just a guess, though.
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>>
>> With an emphasis on "slightly" I might tend to agree but it looks more
>> like the difference
>> between liver cancer and kidney failure tha
At 10:10 PM 12/19/02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Nothing serious, just throwing a quick thought out...
>
>It has been mentioned that you should always use crypto. If you wait
until
>you actually have something private to send, then an adversary will
know
>exactly which message is important. En
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The main problem to solve as I see it would be for legitimate recipients to
> be able to determine when a message is real and not trash, without letting
> an adversary know.
Access such page via http. Sometimes it's a streamed webcam, sometimes
it's
Tim May wrote:
Speculation: I expect the battles over cyberspace to shift to the OS,
with the leading private (non open source) OS makers "enlisted" in the
War Against Illegal Thoughts. The easiest initial front in this war,
one the OS companies like Apple and Microsoft have a corporate
inter
47 matches
Mail list logo
