--
Tim May:
And, as many have noted, very few of the kids today are
libertarians (either small L or large L).
James A. Donald:
When you were a teenager, everyone thought that Ho Chi Minh
was the greatest, had a picture of Che Guevera on their
wall, and thought the Soviet Union
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
James A. Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Searching GG on don frederickson got tim is maybe more reliable than
pasting this URL.
For long urls, compress with tinuyurl.com
http://tinyurl.com/yc3s
If you do that, you have to rely on both the Google URL not
In a message dated 12/8/2003 8:27:05 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As for writing for Reason, they haven't asked, and their editorial
focus is increasingly statist. Cf. Cathy Young's quote at the bottom of
this post.
I disagree. I went to a Reason gathering in
Nomen Nescio wrote:
I find it strange that some people here so often wants to
intimidate those that dares to ask some questions.
Eric put it very well in his post about dicksizewar. Very
true indeed.
I find it very *l*a*m*e* to all the time tell people to RTFM
when something comes up that
Here's one younger person who follows cypherpunks very closely. I do not post because
I have nothing to contribute to the discussion. Someday, when I've learned enough to
be useful, then I will contribute what I can.
Tim's postings re:crypto are the most thought-out, insightful writings you
hi,
Asking questions is part of learning. Unless one
learns how is he expected to participate and make once
in a while intelliget discussions?
Give noobs some space and time to learn and over time
they will contribute to the list.
I think when I was a kid, it took me quite a few
months to
Yeah - might want to hold off on that for now ...
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_PrintFriendlyc=Articlecid=1070925607028call_pageid=968332188492
-p
- Original Message -
From: Tim Meehan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 04:27:38PM -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
Everyone agrees that big corporations are oppressive,
bureaucratic, inefficient, etc. No one more so than the
management advisers to big corporations.
I'm not sure I'd agree that big corporations are oppressive. How?
I once
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 04:27:38PM -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
the business as old fart pinko activists of today. And if the
same is true of the libertarian party, well it has been walking
dead for some considerable time, but its death does not reflect
the health of libertarianism.
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:45:43PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
You need to read my long, long essay in True Names, then. This is
more widely available than anything I would waste my time doing for
Body Peircing or Skate, even if I wanted to.
As for writing for Reason, they haven't asked, and
An unforeseen consequence of government incompetence.
http://ontario.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=25324
TORONTO - Ontario Consumers for Safe Access to Recreational Cannabis is happy to
inform consumers that, because of Health Canada's failure to implement
constitutional Medical Marijuana
I find it strange that some people here so often wants to intimidate those that dares
to ask some questions. Eric put it very well in his post about dicksizewar. Very true
indeed.
I find it very *l*a*m*e* to all the time tell people to RTFM when something comes up
that happened to be have been
On 8 Dec 2003 at 13:17, Tim May wrote:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=enlr=lang_enie=UTF-8oe=UTF
-8safe=offthreadm=220820032357238678%25timcmay%40removethis.got.net
rn um=1prev=/
groups%3Fq%3Dfrederickson%2Bgot%2Btim%26hl%3Den%26lr%3Dlang_en%26ie%3D
UT F-8%26oe%3DUTF
--
On 7 Dec 2003 at 21:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
many here likely would not be happy if I called myself
libertarian, because I feel that corporations are titanic
forces unfriendly to the vast majority of human beings and
unworthy of human liberty.
Everyone agrees that big corporations
Does anyone have a reasonably complete cypherpunks archive available
for FTP? Perhaps I could host them on my server and let Google index
them. That might be useful.
There are only two live ones. Someone knows more ?
The second one is FTP-able:
On Dec 8, 2003, at 1:23 PM, Keith Ray wrote:
who
end
It might help if you sent these requests to the corresponding
administrivia/majordomo/etc. sits instead of to the list distributions.
(But probably not.)
--Tim May
--Tim May
That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:37:44AM +, Michael Shields wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
James A. Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Searching GG on don frederickson got tim is maybe more reliable than
pasting this URL.
For long urls, compress with tinuyurl.com
'92-'94 here: http://www.cybershamanix.com/punk.html
with a link to the later stuff here:
http://cypherpunks.venona.com/
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 06:56:07PM -0800, Morlock Elloi wrote:
Does anyone have a reasonably complete cypherpunks archive available
for FTP? Perhaps I could host
Well, I wouldn't apply the word oppressive across the board to the
cultures of big companies, but the fact is that modern American coporate
culture more often than not imitates a top-down, 'statist' culture that is
so universal we rarely recognize it.
For instance, high-level strategic
On Dec 8, 2003, at 11:13 PM, Sarad AV wrote:
hi,
Asking questions is part of learning. Unless one
learns how is he expected to participate and make once
in a while intelliget discussions?
1. You never contribute anything that indicates you have actually
learned.
2. Your questions, such as the
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Tim May wrote:
It happened in one of the movies groups (rec.arts.current-movies),
when the thread was on DVD copy protection and the (claimed) illegality
of making DVDs of movies.
I explained how I was cheerfully making an average of a DVD a day of my
favorite current
Lne is on dialup? Wow.
Anyhow, I'm a newbie who has been lurking a while. Privacy concerns and what
intelligent people think about it is what got me on this list.With the USA
becoming the world's most totalitarian state in disguise... The sheen on the
illusion of liberty here will wear thin soon,
On Dec 9, 2003, at 7:45 AM, Declan McCullagh wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 04:27:38PM -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
Everyone agrees that big corporations are oppressive,
bureaucratic, inefficient, etc. No one more so than the
management advisers to big corporations.
I'm not sure I'd agree that
On Dec 7, 2003, at 6:54 PM, Greg Newby wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 07:37:26PM -0800, John Young wrote:
...
What I like about the ring-in-the-flesh crowd is their pleasure in
grossing out the stodgers. Makes me wish I still had that knack
instead of only the memories.
Hey, John -- wear some of
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:57:00PM -0500, Duncan Frissell wrote:
Then one of them claimed he had arranged to have my account yanked, for
violation of the DMCA. He claimed he had sent copies of my criminal
admissions to Got.net, to the RIAA, to law enforcement (shudder!),
and so on.
I
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:47:27AM +0100, edo wrote:
With the USA
becoming the world's most totalitarian state in disguise...
That's a pretty silly thing to say.
Sure you don't want to educate yourself on those other states in the
world?
As far as I'm concerned, true anonymity in finacial
On Dec 9, 2003, at 12:07 PM, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:57:00PM -0500, Duncan Frissell wrote:
Then one of them claimed he had arranged to have my account yanked,
for
violation of the DMCA. He claimed he had sent copies of my
criminal
admissions to Got.net, to the RIAA, to
On Dec 9, 2003, at 9:39 AM, Tyler Durden wrote:
Well, I wouldn't apply the word oppressive across the board to the
cultures of big companies, but the fact is that modern American
coporate culture more often than not imitates a top-down, 'statist'
culture that is so universal we rarely
Tim's whine (complaint) withstanding, I just got the January issue of Reason
in the mail and of interest is Mike Godwin's interview of Bruce Sterling-
Cybergreen: Bruce Sterling on media, design, fiction, and the future (p 42-50).
It's worth a read.
Regards, Matt-
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:47:27AM +0100, edo wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, true anonymity in finacial affairs (and
secure communication channels) is the only real method open to
peacefully combat the all seeing [etc.]
We have anonymity in Web browsing (more or less, thanks to Lance
co).
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 07:22:19AM -0800, Eric Murray wrote:
I'm getting tired of running the list. As it is now it doesn't provide
much value and I could use my time for something else. Could someone
please set up another node? I'll send you all my scripts etc. But I
won't maintain it
On Dec 9, 2003, at 12:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim's whine (complaint) withstanding, I just got the January issue of
Reason
in the mail and of interest is Mike Godwin's interview of Bruce
Sterling-
Cybergreen: Bruce Sterling on media, design, fiction, and the future
(p 42-50).
It's
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 02:18:37 +0200
Anatoly Vorobey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was a rhetorical question. In the old Soviet oligarchy, you
would get into real trouble for publicly speaking against it. In
today's corporate oligarchy, this is obviously not true. Therefore
the comparison is
On Dec 9, 2003, at 4:57 PM, Eric Murray wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 03:05:29PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
Since Eric Murray has expressed distaste with my views
I pretty much agree with your views, minus the racism and misogny.
On days that the brilliant thoughtful Tim posts, I'm in awe.
When Tim
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 03:05:29PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
Since Eric Murray has expressed distaste with my views
I pretty much agree with your views, minus the racism and misogny.
On days that the brilliant thoughtful Tim posts, I'm in awe.
When Tim the asshole posts, I'm disgusted.
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 06:41:21PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
However, I don't see the strong support for Soviet or Maoist-style state
control these days...these are vaguely romantic notions once in a while, but
they don't have any deep
Tim May wrote...
This is silly, socialist nonsense. I know some of the book buyers at the
Borders store in Santa Cruz (the very one that the anti-bigness lefties
tried to ban from opening in Santa Cruz). Not only do they have a local
authors section which is larger than the similar section at
37 matches
Mail list logo
