Wheee! NYC==Police State for the last week for those of you living under
rocks...
--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
+ ^ + :"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. /|\
\|/ :They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country
Spam is the least of the problems for remailers when it comes to
abuse. You should be more concerned about possible liability for
illegal messages.
In a way, spam has actually made the remailer operator's life easier
as people today are used to receiving annoying and obscene email.
Ten years ago,
Variola wrote...
>Making sure we have robust remailing services in one shape or
>another and at the same time have some kind of at least indirect
>acceptance from legislators and also a low degree of spam flowing
>through are essential goals.
Any legislator seeking to control how people use a c
> What are the possible solutions for the remailers? Make all
> remailers middleman only and adding the ability to opt-in for
Open wireless access points.
No one said you are entitled to mail anonymously from the comfort of your
home/office. Stop whining.
=
end
(of original message)
At 01:30 PM 9/1/04 +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Yet we need
>to make sure we're not abused too much since sooner or later laws
>will catch up with the remailers should abuse sky-rocket.
You need a Bill of Rights that specifies freedom of expression,
and judges that understand it. Since you appear
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0831041_photostamps_1.html?link=eaf
Nomen Nescio wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Are remailers an unsolveable paradox?
Yes.
Adios, Lemuria. Hate to see you go, but I understand completely.
--
Roy M. Silvernail is [EMAIL PROTECTED], and you're not
"It's just this little chromium switch, here." - TFS
SpamAssass
Some good points, Johnny.
I'm not convinced Spam and the remailers are inherently incompatible. Or at
least, I'm thinking there's a sort of uncertainty principle that should work
between legit remailable messages and spam.
it may be a tricky business, but I suspect that the need of spammers to s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Are remailers an unsolveable paradox?
We want to be able to provide the means for whistleblowers and
others to communicate in a secure and anonymous fashion. Yet we need
to make sure we're not abused too much since sooner or later laws
will catch
Remailers remain effective when you run your own as the
first hop and accept no incoming remail.
To be sure, if everyone did that no remailer would accept
remails. Shhh.
10 matches
Mail list logo