RE: The burn-off of twenty million useless eaters and minoritie s

2003-02-24 Thread John Kelsey
At 10:31 AM 2/24/03 +, Vincent Penquerc'h wrote:
...
Now, I may have left my clue home, so feel free to explain *why*
100% capitalism (eg no state left, no other power) could never end up
with power aggregation.
I don't think you can *ever* prove a claim like that, since you're dealing 
with humans, who can be only very imperfectly modeled.  There's no system 
that couldn't possibly fall into some horrible state, whether that's 
tyranny or chaos or lemming-like rush to an unwinnable war or ostrich-like 
refusal to prepare for clearly oncoming war.  Systems of human decision 
makers are driven by the decisions made by those humans, and sometimes, 
they're a bunch of idiots.  More centralized decision-making has the ugly 
property that a smaller set of decision-makers have to be idiots to run the 
whole society into a ditch.  On the other hand, more centralized 
decision-making makes larger projects possible sometimes, especially ones 
involving big, long wars.

--
Vincent Penquerc'h
--John Kelsey, [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: The burn-off of twenty million useless eaters and minoritie s

2003-02-24 Thread Vincent Penquerc'h
Title: RE: The burn-off of twenty million useless eaters and minoritie s





   Too much capitalism is as bad as too much communism.
  
  That's semantically equivalent to saying that too much 
 economics is as bad as too much totalitarianism...
  
 
 Too much liberty is as bad as too much repression?
 
 Right.


If you think capitalism is liberty, you have a problem.


Capitalism would work as freedom catalyst only if it would not lead
to the aggregation of power in some places. Once you have power, you
use it. Pretending, like some did, that people with power would not
use force once they reach the stage where they *can*, is disingenuous.
And saying that this has then ceased to be capitalism misses the point:
you end up in a society with centralized power, and which only differs
from a state by the name.
Which is why some capitalism is good, but too much is bad.


I do concede that I'd prefer capitalism much better than communism
though. My association of both on the same grounds was way overboard
and triggered by this evil commie pinko nonsense.


Now, I may have left my clue home, so feel free to explain *why*
100% capitalism (eg no state left, no other power) could never end up
with power aggregation.


-- 
Vincent Penquerc'h 





Re: The burn-off of twenty million useless eaters and minoritie s

2003-02-23 Thread James A. Donald
--
James A. Donald
  Highly capitalist nations do not murder millions.

On 21 Feb 2003 at 17:09, David Howe wrote:
 but their highly capitalist companies sometimes do.

Don't be silly.  You have been reading too much Lenin.


--digsig
 James A. Donald
 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
 qQotsl6wN3i4RMqlTN1JTdpA5gU7wC9mp4Gj2fVs
 4WN+iLzobxHF9dI56LAcJhpMotMMgyrx983tvS7YA



Re: The burn-off of twenty million useless eaters and minoritie s

2003-02-21 Thread David Howe
at Friday, February 21, 2003 4:44 PM, James A. Donald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was seen to say:
 Highly capitalist nations do not murder millions.
but their highly capitalist companies sometimes do. is this a meaningful
distinction?



RE: The burn-off of twenty million useless eaters and minoritie s

2003-02-21 Thread James A. Donald
--
On 20 Feb 2003 at 16:09, Vincent Penquerc'h wrote:
 Ah yeah, the good old front against communists. Some people
 haven't learned that political views aren't what makes one a
 bastard. Commies *must* be bad, you see ? Too much capitalism
 is as bad as too much communism.

Highly capitalist nations do not murder millions.

--digsig
 James A. Donald
 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
 LS0PPszrbHPaadDyv9OpkI1d4Tym+mjxMyowVUMa
 4dEsfuHBg8G0mXDn/U8FBak0jzB4WFSXGPt/n1Lt9





RE: The burn-off of twenty million useless eaters and minoritie s

2003-02-21 Thread R. A. Hettinga
At 4:09 PM + on 2/20/03, Vincent Penquerc'h wrote:


 Too much capitalism is as bad as too much communism.

That's semantically equivalent to saying that too much economics is as bad as too much 
totalitarianism...



Cheers,
RAH
Capitalism, being, of course, Marxist argot for economics...
-- 
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience. -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'