On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 02:14:29PM -0400, Paul Hart wrote:
On Wednesday, August 20, 2003, at 09:09 AM, Harmon Seaver wrote:
It seems that the military is claiming that we are in a national
emergency and they can do whatever they want, despite laws to the
contrary.
You are in a
On Wednesday, August 20, 2003, at 09:09 AM, Harmon Seaver wrote:
It seems that the military is claiming that we are in a national
emergency and they can do whatever they want, despite laws to the
contrary.
You are in a national emergency.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:01:38AM -0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
Peter Thonen wrote..
On that same note, any weekend warrior who complains about being activated
has
no sympathy from me.
Take the devils coin, be prepared to do his work also.
Well, what if the Devil stole that $ from you in
: Thoenen, Peter CIV Sprint
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Harmon Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: US soldiers in Iraq held against their will
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 16:52:25 +0200
Harmon Seaver wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 10:37:15PM -0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 02:33
building don't actually work! Otherwise,
keep on bleeding the beast...
-TD
From: Thoenen, Peter CIV Sprint
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: US soldiers in Iraq held against their will
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 19:20:15
On Sunday, August 17, 2003, at 12:33 PM, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Just heard about this local guy who reluctantly went to Iraq because
he was in the reserves, now his contract is up (as of 7/31) and they
won't let him out.
I've known for more than 40 years that there's always been language in
On Sunday, August 17, 2003, at 01:43 PM, Harmon Seaver wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 02:04:09PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
On Sunday, August 17, 2003, at 12:33 PM, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Just heard about this local guy who reluctantly went to Iraq
because
he was in the reserves, now his contract
At 02:33 PM 8/17/03 -0500, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Just heard about this local guy who reluctantly went to Iraq because
he was in the reserves, now his contract is up (as of 7/31) and they
won't let him out.
Did he reluctantly take the $$$ to be in the reserves, too?
my
enlistment contract
Just heard about this local guy who reluctantly went to Iraq because
he was in the reserves, now his contract is up (as of 7/31) and they
won't let him out.
Dear friends
As many of you know I am in Iraq with the
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 03:21:43PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
On Sunday, August 17, 2003, at 01:43 PM, Harmon Seaver wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 02:04:09PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
On Sunday, August 17, 2003, at 12:33 PM, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Just heard about this local guy who reluctantly
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 10:37:15PM -0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 02:33 PM 8/17/03 -0500, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Just heard about this local guy who reluctantly went to Iraq because
he was in the reserves, now his contract is up (as of 7/31) and they
won't let him out.
Did he
Harmon Seaver wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 10:37:15PM -0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 02:33 PM 8/17/03 -0500, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Just heard about this local guy who reluctantly went to Iraq because
he was in the reserves, now his contract is up (as of 7/31) and they
won't let him
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:52:25PM +0200, Thoenen, Peter CIV Sprint wrote:
On a semi related side note, how long has this guy been in (total length of
service)? All personnel when they join the US Military are quite clearly
informed they have an 8-year commitment, regardless of how long
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 10:02, Harmon Seaver wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:52:25PM +0200, Thoenen, Peter CIV Sprint wrote:
On a semi related side note, how long has this guy been in (total length of
service)? All personnel when they join the US Military are quite clearly
informed
14 matches
Mail list logo
