R.A. Hettinga wrote:
At 8:06 AM -0600 12/5/04, Neil Johnson wrote:
Where is Tim May when when you need him? :-)
Nah, this is mere Younglish wierdness.
You have to talk about useless eaters to be totally mayified...
Cheers,
RAH
John would warn you about the organ cuts
Tim would rave
R.A. Hettinga wrote:
At 5:07 PM -0500 12/4/04, R.W. (Bob) Erickson wrote:
Be kind to yourself, but never forget you're kind
You're a fluke of the universe, and while your standing there looking
stupid, the universe is laughing behind your back...
Or something.
Cheers,
R.A. (Bob) Hettinga
Bobhood is never a light burden, as I'm sure RAH can attest
--bob
Tyler Durden wrote:
I thought JR Bob Dobbs got beamed up to that comet with those LA
Koolaid kooks...
-TD
From: R.W. (Bob) Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Word
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 18:42:01 -0500
word
Neil Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 08:46 -0500, R.W. (Bob) Erickson wrote:
To be bobbed is never the goal,
but bobless fear steers the undifferentiated bob
along conventional paths,
to the abattoir
Where is Tim May when when you need him? :-)
Probably busy in his hilltop bunker
Steve Furlong wrote:
On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 20:42, R.W. (Bob) Erickson wrote:
Bobhood is never a light burden, as I'm sure RAH can attest
Bobbittization would make the burden lighter.
To be bobbed is never the goal,
but bobless fear steers the undifferentiated bob
along conventional
John Kelsey wrote:
From: Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 4, 2004 8:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Word Of the Subgenius...
I thought JR Bob Dobbs got beamed up to that comet with those LA Koolaid
kooks...
No, but I do believe the comet kooks engaged in bobbitization
One of the tools currently being used in the cognitive sciences is the
measurement of reaction time to stimulus.
It turns out that the length of time it takes to given situations is a
credible proxy for how difficult the discrimination is to make.
Imagine a paranoia involving mysterious e-mail
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:17:30AM -0500, John Kelsey wrote:
Maybe, maybe not. The thing I always find interesting and annoying about Tim May's posts is that he's sometimes making really clearly thought out, intelligent points, and other times spewing out nonsense so crazy
J.A. Terranson wrote:
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
Those cops you taught...do you think they were stupid enough to assume that,
because this was their first time hearing about Stego, that Al Qaeda was
only starting to use it right then?
Thats an interesting question on several
Process and perception
This capacity for making high order discriminations about relationships
between objects in our world, can be taken as the proper function of our
cognitive competency. The attribute of intentionality, to this way of
thinking, is best understood as work product of a discrete
Process and perception
This capacity for making high order discriminations about relationships
between objects in our world, can be taken as the proper function of our
cognitive competency. The attribute of intentionality, to this way of
thinking, is best understood as work product of a
R.A. Hettinga wrote:
At 10:56 AM -0500 12/10/04, Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
But I'm about 2 posts away from ensconcing RWBE in my procmail
file
What's taking you so long?
:-)
Cheers,
RAH
cf: various imprecations against feeding trolls cet...
Aww, come on guys
i only eat little sheep
and i
The secular bible: Our project
First let me speak to my Christian brothers and sisters. I mean you no
disrespect by using the term bible in an unholy attack on your faith.
The project of this secular bible honors the sanctity of holy documents.
A secular bible could only be true to itself is it
Tyler Durden wrote:
Well, when you put it that way, that changes everything.
All is now clear. Please continue downloading the syntactic mappings
of random neural firing...I'm using your output to seed a random
number generator.
Oh, and don't forget to cc Choate.
-TD
You could do worse, my
Say what you mean, mean what you say
Speaking in metaphor is anti-social
If I cant understand you,
I cannot trust you.
Encrypted, encoded, or implied
Secrets are a threat to the homeland
Steve Thompson wrote:
--- R.W. (Bob) Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Thompson wrote:
[assholes]
You tell them, Steve
I believe I just did.
Insanity is a great cover for an insurectionist!
I suppose it could be, although I am give to belive that residents
Steve Thompson wrote:
--- R.A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lions and Tigers and Steganography, Nell...
For those of you without a program, here is the new, official, Horsemen
of
the Infocalypse Scorecard:
At 3:14 PM -0400 10/3/04, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
Horseman Color
(curious thing about this spew, it keeps disappearing into the bit
bucket, I know its raw verbiage, but is it so incoherent it
self-destructs? -bob)
Process and perception
This capacity for making high order discriminations about relationships
between objects in our world, can be taken as the
Communication is about context
Sometimes the context is so obvious that the frame is nearly invisible,
sometimes the context is so subtle that indications of obvious
significance can only be detected after much study.
Language and meaning involve sharing of contexts.
This is obvious, what is
Tyler Durden wrote:
As to the crypto relevance: context Arranged signals can be anything
at all. If you don't share the context of the communicators, you have
no idea what they convey in their conversation about the whether.
That's a stretch. Soon you'll say that Post-modernist literary theory
Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
Steve Thompson wrote:
--- R.W. (Bob) Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imagine a paranoia involving mysterious e-mail delays and the
length of time it takes to catagorize
Imagine hordes of otherwise unemployable psychologists and cognitive
psychologists deployed
Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
R.W. (Bob) Erickson wrote:
(curious thing about this spew, it keeps disappearing into the bit
bucket,
Yawn. Roboposting this babble doesn't really increase its chances of
getting read. I work through JY because I know there's uranium in
that ore. But I'm about 2
The need for a coherent framework to hang our speculations on is obvious.
The impossibility of any consensus based prototype is pure politics.
We need a way out, and that way is to take a lesson from the theory of
evolution.
The lucky semantic construction is tested in practice by a virtual swarm
Sunder wrote:
Original URL: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/12/14/alt_biometrics/
Gait advances in emerging biometrics
Timing is everything.
The coherence of timing patterns
is a proxy for identity
Measure their timing and you can glimpse their mind
Mess with their timing and you can disrupt
Tyler Durden wrote:
Something occurred to me...it probably occurred to others already but
I am a stoopid Cypherpunk, don't forget.
Anyone think it a TINY bit odd that someone with a fairly mundane
complaint about bad computer gear would know to come in on an
anonymous remailer?
My first
Congratulations, you just turned your vehicle into drug paraphenalia
What? You claim it is Not for drugs? Tell this to the judge.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tyler Durden
Sent: May 2, 2005 10:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
26 matches
Mail list logo
