> But now we're back to the question: how can Tor be improved to deal with
> this very serious and important problem? What are the steps that might
> be taken, however imperfect, to reduce the amount of abuse coming from
> Tor nodes?
That's trivial: charge Tor-originated users for editing. That 0
That's trivial: charge Tor-originated users for editing. That 0.0001% (all
three of them) that actually contributes to Wikipedia will be resourceful
enough to create untraceable payment accounts.
..and ensure that all future Tor-originated Wikipedia entries are about
anonymous payments and tran
One way to build a psuedo-pseudonymous mechanism to hang off of Tor
that would be easy for the Wikipedians to deal with
would be to have a server that lets you connect to it using Tor,
log in using some authentication protocol or other,
then have it generate different outgoing addresses based on
At 05:37 PM 9/27/2005, lists wrote:
Tyler Durden wrote:
Sorry...I don't understand...why would psuedonymity services be provided
within Tor?
I find the concept of having both pseudonymous and anonymous traffic
through TOR quite interesting. In some cases, you really do wish to just
TOR it
Quoting Bill Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> One way to build a psuedo-pseudonymous mechanism to hang off of Tor
> that would be easy for the Wikipedians to deal with
> would be to have a server that lets you connect to it using Tor,
> log in using some authentication protocol or other,
> then have
> - Forwarded message from Jimmy Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> We are not looking for a perfect solution. Yes, Wikis will be
> vandalized. We're prepared to deal with that, we do deal with that.
> But what I am seeking is some efforts to think usefully about how to
> helpfully reconcile o
o: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Wikipedia & Tor]
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:57:50 +0200
- Forwarded message from Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:54:38 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROT
Quoting Alan Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > - Forwarded message from Jimmy Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> > We are not looking for a perfect solution. Yes, Wikis will be
> > vandalized. We're prepared to deal with that, we do deal with that.
> > But what I am seeking is some efforts to
- Forwarded message from Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:54:38 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wikipedia & Tor
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at
[yes, I know I'm preaching to the choir]
> - Forwarded message from Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> > A potential for cooperation is the proposal below for authenticated
> > access to Wikipedia through Tor. I will not speak to any particular
> > design here, but if Wikipedia has
Tyler Durden wrote:
Sorry...I don't understand...why would psuedonymity services be provided
within Tor?
I find the concept of having both pseudonymous and anonymous traffic
through TOR quite interesting. In some cases, you really do wish to just
separate yourself from your meatspace identity
At 8:37 PM -0400 9/27/05, lists wrote:
> Building a TOR nymspace would be much more
>interesting and distributed.
Since the first time I met Dingledine, he was talking pseudonymity,
bigtime. I was curious when he went to play with onion routers, but maybe
I'm not so surprised anymore...
Cheers,
R
12 matches
Mail list logo
