Re: 4096 bit SSL keys

John wrote: > The reason I asked: updating a few certs at office recently I nuked > an older F5 LTM device by installing a 4096 bit key/cert pair - the > load on the appliance (Linux based) shot up from less than 1 to about > 30 and became so excruciatingly slow it was nearly

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

Greg Newby wrote: > As I just wrote, this message should be going out via the > *new* server and settings. It's addressed to cypherpunks at > lists.cpunks.org, as opposed to the regular address, cypherpunks > at cpunks.org Folks, If all has gone well, this message will reach you via the new

Re: moving on (multiple future forks)

"Stephen D. Williams" wrote: > Cool. On the previous question of replicated email and mailman > servers, I was recently looking into ways to do that. Since all > email messages have unique IDs already, it isn't difficult to > replicate messages at any point while avoiding

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

Bardi Harborow wrote: > The lack of SPF, DKIM and DMARC records, as well as TLS, on the new > list is still wreaking havoc with my spam filter. Any chance of a fix? > I'd be happy to provide assistance. I'm guessing the big change since we moved the list is TLS. SPF is