Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/27/2017 05:35 PM, booty wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 19 2017 08:31:04 -0800 > > "Razer" wrote: > > > > the white middle-class way of life is responsible for terror attacks > > /Blames victims/ > /Feels better about self/ > > Self-hatred is for cucks. > > > the computer industry (this list) > >

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 3:21 PM, jim bell wrote: > > You might have more luck with some sort of 'hight latency' > > mixing network and a crpytocurrency with built in > > 'anonimity' (that is NOT bitcoin) > > > Zerocoin...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zerocoin

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 20:21:14 + (UTC) jim bell wrote: > > >   tor and bitcoin are obviously not the proper tools to use > >    against the state. Especially tor, the pentagon's cyberweapon. > I read, months ago, that one of the military's uses for TOR is to > control

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/21/2017 11:57 PM, grarpamp wrote: > Mechanical properties of structural steels at elevated temperatures > and after cooling down (2006) > http://www.civil.canterbury.ac.nz/sif/documents/paper19.pdf > > Fire safety design of building structures has received greater > attention in recent

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/5pcwd6/this_is_insane_does_anyone_know_if_this_guy_lived/

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

Mechanical properties of structural steels at elevated temperatures and after cooling down (2006) http://www.civil.canterbury.ac.nz/sif/documents/paper19.pdf Fire safety design of building structures has received greater attention in recent times due to continuing losses of properties and lives

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

From: juan jim bell wrote: >  From: grarpamp   > >Rather amazed AP hasn't yet risen (publicly) to affect things. >> No disagreement from me on that!  When I proposed AP almost 22 years >> ago, https://cryptome.org/ap.htm, I

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 20:04:20 + (UTC) jim bell wrote: > > > From: grarpamp > > >Rather amazed AP hasn't yet risen (publicly) to affect things. > No disagreement from me on that!  When I proposed AP almost 22 years > ago, 

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/20/2017 03:04 PM, jim bell wrote: > > > *From:* grarpamp > >> Rather amazed AP hasn't yet risen (publicly) to affect things. > > No disagreement from me on that! When I proposed AP almost 22 > years ago,

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

From: grarpamp >Rather amazed AP hasn't yet risen (publicly) to affect things. No disagreement from me on that!  When I proposed AP almost 22 years ago,  https://cryptome.org/ap.htm, I believed that the possibilities and advantages of the system would be immediately

Re: [offlist] Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

Rather amazed AP hasn't yet risen (publicly) to affect things. After all, we have bounties to murder the murderers (via the state)... http://www.whokilledseth.com/ And some would say there are a lot of culpable murder ordering murderers at the top to be murdered. Would not surprise to see should

Re: [offlist] Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/18/2017 10:45 PM, grarpamp wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Razer wrote: >> All that stuff was subject to collapse and other terminal damage by the >> shock wave of those 255,000 lb planes that weigh more 3-48 foot tractor > As people said similarly earlier, if

Re: [offlist] Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Razer wrote: > All that stuff was subject to collapse and other terminal damage by the > shock wave of those 255,000 lb planes that weigh more 3-48 foot tractor As people said similarly earlier, if you're asking re wtc7, not sure if 1 and 2

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Razer wrote: > Metals weaken significantly and permanently long before they ever reach > melting point. Of course, that obvious engineering should be considered... any degree of heat causes progressive degree of weakness in metals and other

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 22:31:31 -0600 "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote: > On 01/17/2017 06:32 PM, grarpamp wrote: > > iron melts 1811k 1538c boils 3134k 2862c > > steel melts 1100-1538c depending on alloy content > > aluminum melts 933k 660c boils 2473k 2470c > > jet fuel open air burn

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/17/2017 06:32 PM, grarpamp wrote: > iron melts 1811k 1538c boils 3134k 2862c > steel melts 1100-1538c depending on alloy content > aluminum melts 933k 660c boils 2473k 2470c > jet fuel open air burn 1030c to 2500k 2230c > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_temperature Metal doesn't have to

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:06 PM, James A. Donald wrote: > There is a video of the last couple of guys inside the WTC 7, a newsman and > a secret service guy. > Do you suppose that they were in on the conspiracy > and were planting demolition charges? What if, Neo, there was

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_9/11_Commission http://www.bing.com/search?q=geological+map+of+lower+manhattan

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

9_11 - Blueprint for Truth-The Architecture of Destruction https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQgVCj7q49o starting at 13:20 lots of examples of controlled demolition in which the buildings tip and tilt in various directions A LOT MORE than WTC7 did. The

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

> http://www.slideshare.net/HolyYeshua/solving-the-radioactive-riddle-of-9-11-a-simple-explanation-of-ground-zero Try un-jumping links to original before posting http://www.911history.de/ http://www.911history.de/pdfs/911_Analysis_en.pdf

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:01:22 -0800 Razer wrote: > > On 01/08/2017 08:54 PM, "juan" Kill-listed at the server. > mommy mommy. I'm being treated like the despicable piece of shit that I am and I DON"T LIKE IT. Too bad I can't actually KILL people who

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 08:54 PM, "juan" Kill-listed at the server.

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:49:25 -0800 Razer wrote: > I predict it will be the year of the renegades... of funk... Why is a trolling shitbag like you subscribed tho this list?

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

# Secret World of Mohamed Atta https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LULV1gicJs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJIqtwW1kR0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V01Ol2Nk-Tk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Able_Danger https://fas.org/sgp/news/2010/09/dark-contrast.pdf https://fas.org/sgp/jud/dark-contrast2.pdf

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:04:32 -0800 Razer wrote: > This entirely lost me. Convo over. What convo. This was just me wasting time with an absolute shitbag like you. 11 > > > > >> If there are they didn't all show up last week you know? The guy I > >> share camp

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:43:21 -0800 Razer wrote: > > > On 01/08/2017 06:37 PM, juan wrote: > > The ~15 million 'ilegal' immigrants who > > can't cross the border > > DUDE! There MIGHT BE "~15 million 'ilegal' immigrants" in the country. This is how stupid your

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 06:40 PM, juan wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:30:49 -0800 > Razer wrote: > >> >> On 01/08/2017 06:17 PM, juan wrote: >>> By the way, I didn't even bother fully reading that >> >> I know that. You're a functional illiterate. > > Tell me rayzer, like a good

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 06:37 PM, juan wrote: > The ~15 million 'ilegal' immigrants who > can't cross the border DUDE! There MIGHT BE "~15 million 'ilegal' immigrants" in the country. If there are they didn't all show up last week you know? The guy I share camp space with is from El Salvador and

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:30:49 -0800 Razer wrote: > > > On 01/08/2017 06:17 PM, juan wrote: > > By the way, I didn't even bother fully reading that > > > I know that. You're a functional illiterate. Tell me rayzer, like a good american fascist, how many

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:30:11 -0800 Razer wrote: > > > On 01/08/2017 06:27 PM, juan wrote: > > More truly crazy, fact-free commentary. > That's because you aren't looking out the window of the cafe I sit in > at the moment or you could see them. What would I see? The

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 06:16 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Here's the photographic proof of the post-liquified rock layers at > ground zero: That's schist. It's a lot like what's called "Chert" in California. Looks A LOT like rock doesn't it? It isn't. It crumbles when you touch it, and Schist is

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 06:27 PM, juan wrote: > More truly crazy, fact-free commentary. That's because you aren't looking out the window of the cafe I sit in at the moment or you could see them. Better look like you have money though. They're the 'shopping police' and if you aren't shopping they'll harass

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 05:49 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > Ground zero showed no building submersion: > > http://www.slideshare.net/HolyYeshua/solving-the-radioactive-riddle-of-9-11-a-simple-explanation-of-ground-zero Didn't need to be 'submerged' just undermined. And We were discussing WTC 7. Not the

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:10:25 -0800 Razer wrote: > > > On 01/08/2017 05:37 PM, juan wrote: > > Notice also the if 'terrists' attacks were retaliation for what > > you joo-amerikunts do all the time, then there would be at > > least a real, big, terrist attack every week. Yet

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:39:00 -0800 Razer wrote: > I have proved > that (at least) the shock wave of a 255,000 lb 'tuning fork' striking > the buildings nearby caused a resonance in the ground below which is > mud with wood By the way, I didn't even bother fully reading

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 09:30:14PM -0300, Juan wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:22:36 -0800 > Razer wrote: > > > On 01/08/2017 03:35 PM, juan wrote: > > > > > > If some sort of magical mud magically liquified under a > > > building, then the building would magically sink in a

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 05:37 PM, juan wrote: > Notice also the if 'terrists' attacks were retaliation for what > you joo-amerikunts do all the time, then there would be at least > a real, big, terrist attack every week. Yet there are none. There are three police agencies patrolling the

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 08:35:01PM -0300, Juan wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 15:19:15 -0800 > Razer wrote: > > > > > > Reality bites (people making shit up ... on the ass). the fact that > > the subterranean structures in MUD under the buildings were > > undermined by the shock

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 17:28:45 -0800 Razer wrote: > You're probably are racist enough to think "Sand Niggers" (note the > quotes) aren't smart enough to coordinate an attack like 9-11. The fact that they can do it doesn't mean that they actually did it. You

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 05:10 PM, juan made some shit up as if he knows how I feel about Arab people: > the evil arab terrists did it eh "Terrorists? Why they're people lacking identity. They're seeking to be noticed." ~Marshall McLuhan interviewed after the very first airliner hijacking in the 60s. He

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 17:04:04 -0800 Razer wrote: > On 01/08/2017 04:49 PM, juan wrote: > > > It's funny how you ranted against 'science' > > I don't rant against science. I rant against it's rigidness in the > face of facts that should be altering it's formulation of facts, in >

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 04:32 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > excessively reinforced central column ...and floor supports at the corners but NOT in the middle of the spans on the building's outside edges. So when the buildings had torsionally flexed a few times too often as it WAS NOT designed to do, the

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:39:00 -0800 Razer wrote: > > Because resonance is a universal physical principle. I have proved > that (at least) the shock wave of a 255,000 lb 'tuning fork' striking > the buildings nearby caused a resonance in the ground below which is > mud with wood

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 05:39:52PM -0500, grarpamp wrote: ... > # Incontrovertible - New 9/11 Documentary by Tony Rooke > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5UyynjxAyw > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDQJscd5ba0 > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qirWUviaZuo >

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 04:30 PM, juan wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:22:36 -0800 > Razer wrote: > >> On 01/08/2017 03:35 PM, juan wrote: >>> If some sort of magical mud magically liquified under a >>> building, then the building would magically sink in a >>> pool of mud.

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:22:36 -0800 Razer wrote: > On 01/08/2017 03:35 PM, juan wrote: > > > > If some sort of magical mud magically liquified under a > > building, then the building would magically sink in a > > pool of mud. Especially when there are 'a couple' of

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 03:35 PM, juan wrote: > > If some sort of magical mud magically liquified under a > building, then the building would magically sink in a > pool of mud. Especially when there are 'a couple' of videos > showing a building that indeed seems to be 'sinking'. > >

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 08:17:26AM -0800, Razer wrote: > On 01/08/2017 05:42 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 09:56:35PM +1000, James A. Donald wrote: > >> I have watched videos of the collapse of WTC 7 frame by frame. It did not > >> collapse symmetrically - it sagged on

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:51:52 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote: > On 1/9/2017 5:59 AM, Steve Kinney wrote: > > In their position paper Rebuilding America's Defenses, the PNAC > > folks said that their plan for global domination could not be > > effectively implemented absent a

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 15:19:15 -0800 Razer wrote: > > Reality bites (people making shit up ... on the ass). the fact that > the subterranean structures in MUD under the buildings were > undermined by the shock wave of a 255,000 lb aircraft Perhaps a poll would be in

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 03:23 PM, juan wrote: > FIDEL CASTRO SAYS SO. QOD He did? Then I'm in good company. Rr

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 15:19:15 -0800 Razer wrote: > On 01/08/2017 02:56 PM, juan wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:50:25 -0800 > > Razer wrote: > > > > > >> Because all these so-called 'experts' are affluent middle-class > > that's how commie shitbags 'think'

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 02:56 PM, juan wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:50:25 -0800 > Razer wrote: > > >> Because all these so-called 'experts' are affluent middle-class > that's how commie shitbags 'think' - if reality doesn't fit > their deranged 'theories', then it's all a

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:50:25 -0800 Razer wrote: > Because all these so-called 'experts' are affluent middle-class that's how commie shitbags 'think' - if reality doesn't fit their deranged 'theories', then it's all a 'burgeois' 'conspiracy' And

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

Correction: believing there are consequences] go their complicity in Genocide. Should read 'believing there are no consequences to their complicity in Genocide.' On 01/08/2017 02:39 PM, grarpamp wrote: > In part regarding flavor of WTC 7 that started this thread... > > # 9/11: Decade of

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On 01/08/2017 02:39 PM, grarpamp wrote: > expert witnesses You mean like the Phud in sheet metal for the computer industry who speculated on the melting temp of the steel in the buildings? A foundry worker or machinist knows more about the melting temperature of construction steel than he

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

In part regarding flavor of WTC 7 that started this thread... # 9/11: Decade of Deception / The Toronto Hearings https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqqelDq4P48 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpiVv8tQdmY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rSJZqMwNoY https://pressfortruth.ca/ On the tenth anniversary

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 09:56:35PM +1000, James A. Donald wrote: > I have watched videos of the collapse of WTC 7 frame by frame. It did not > collapse symmetrically - it sagged on one side. Hence no need for any > official excuse. > > The building looked as if it had been chewed on by giant