Ze Pong
Stefan, I was looking through my history a little and wanted to
apologize for criticizing and devaluing your valuable work. This seems
to be a psychological issue I [still] strongly have.
> an anti-imperialistic Operating System, for
> home usage, e.g. Linux
No, Linux calls for nasty imperialist governments
and their courts and apparatus to brutally enforce their
socialist "GPL" "copyright" "license" under threat of death.
Minimal Berne copyrights don't force anyone to do
On 2/19/22, Stefan Claas wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> I wanted to present a way for people within the EU
> to have an option to phase out the old and non
> reliable and non trustworthy WoT, which can't, as
> you know, not been used for businesses, contracts etc.
It's great you guys are mainstreaming
anyway like, clearly you have more experience with cryptography than
me, i should probably consider you a good person to have the public
key of
On 2/19/22, Stefan Claas wrote:
> The reason why I did it this way with a certificate:
>
> To have a *proof* of ownership and option that it
> is me who did that and the blockchain helps to
> undermine that, because at the timestamping service
> I am registered and log in there via Gmail.
>
> My
On 2/19/22, Stefan Claas wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> the certified document's hash is in three blockchains,
> Bitcoin, ETH and Aion, which you can easily verify.
> And I did not payed any cent for the transactions.
>
> Regards
> Stefan
But why not use a direct document hash that can be verified if you
> forgot to mention,
>
> IIRC when you upload my document the timestamp of my original
> document stays the same and re-upload with a new timestamp is
> not possible. Please sign up with the service to try out, you
> have 5 free timestamps per month and don't have to use their
> payed plan.
Are
Cryptographically I imagine there's a lot of space of different
guarantees here. I'm mostly just still sticking out for the missing
point in the service that was mentioned earlier. I'm big on detering
erasure of history, which the present service provides for.
On 2/19/22, Stefan Claas wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> if you click on the certificate URL (Online Verrification)
> and upload the certificate to the URL, you will see that
> it is signed by an EU Trust Service Provider, for the eIDAS
> regulation within the EU. This signature is legally binding,
> and
Stefan, thanks for your inspirational transparency.
Hopefully we can migrate somehow to protocols that show that documents
are the first ones published of their kind, rather than just that they
were published at the time they say they were.
Is this something you can mention to originstamp? If I
Well onioncat is not "arbitrary node" but is a set up one.
Yet some timing differentiations can be divined by
selectively constructing the "circuit" to test,
looking at setup timings, pushing characterizing
traffic through them and your own nodes,
polling existing services, etc.
Please publish
> Right now we're exploring latency-based attacks but are having trouble
> achieving a particular goal: a way to “ping” an arbitrary node in a
> client’s already-built (“live”) circuit. One-way timing is ideal but round
> trip time would suffice. We can glean this information du
I just noticed that now I started receiving Emails directly from the list
here on gmail.com.
Issue solved.
Hi friend Mirimir : )
Em sex., 19 de jun. de 2020 às 17:10, Mirimir escreveu:
> On 06/19/2020 12:46 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> > Do you read me?
> >
> > What a debugging drama, anyone
On 06/19/2020 12:46 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> Do you read me?
>
> What a debugging drama, anyone has a conspiracy theory ;) ?
I got this directly from Gmail, and did not get a copy via the
cypherpunks list.
Possibly useful advice for @gmail users below, also some list diagnostics:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 03:20:50PM -0700, Mirimir wrote:
> On 06/18/2020 02:29 PM, Se7en wrote:
> > On 20-06-18 14:23:02, Mirimir wrote:
> >> Thanks. I wasn't paying attention, but I did notice the warning about my
> >>
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 4:14 PM Greg Newby wrote:
>
> That was a temporary 13-hour problem caused by a specific misconfiguration I
> applied. There is no indication that mail delivery problems before that are
> related.
>
I definitely had gmail problems for at least 3 days
and I check spam
Do you read me?
What a debugging drama, anyone has a conspiracy theory ;) ?
On 06/18/2020 02:29 PM, Se7en wrote:
> On 20-06-18 14:23:02, Mirimir wrote:
>> Thanks. I wasn't paying attention, but I did notice the warning about my
>> list membership being disabled:
>>
>>> Your membership in the mailing list cypherpunks has been disabled due
>>> to excessive bounces
>>
>> I'm
On 20-06-18 14:23:02, Mirimir wrote:
> Thanks. I wasn't paying attention, but I did notice the warning about my
> list membership being disabled:
>
>> Your membership in the mailing list cypherpunks has been disabled due
>> to excessive bounces
>
> I'm not sure whether that was a cypherpunks
On 06/18/2020 01:04 PM, Sangy wrote:
> Yes
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:55:21PM -0700, Mirimir wrote:
>> Is this thing on?
Thanks. I wasn't paying attention, but I did notice the warning about my
list membership being disabled:
> Your membership in the mailing list cypherpunks has been disabled
Yes
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:55:21PM -0700, Mirimir wrote:
> Is this thing on?
Is this thing on?
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 01:51:36PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > If the ping is not clocked, but is timed (clocked) to a statistically
> > random time within a configured window, the GPA cannot know when to
> > conduct their latency injection attack, and any dropout by me,
high latency ping circle pings, should effectively disappear in the
"usual mix" of traffic between standard peers.
1-hr +/- 15 minutes ping circle with immediate peer nodes ("friend")
could be a mandatory base load.
Even just coordinating links between peer nodes is an order
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 01:15:56PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Here's an obvious in hindsight thought:
>
> Use case: A (hidden, encrypted etc) ping circle (some combo of star
> or token ring yet to be designed) amongst a group of friends who may
> at random points in time, wis
Here's an obvious in hindsight thought:
Use case: A (hidden, encrypted etc) ping circle (some combo of star
or token ring yet to be designed) amongst a group of friends who may
at random points in time, wish to send wheat txt sms in the chaff of
the regular circle ping.
Usually the ping is chaff
27 matches
Mail list logo
