USA v. James Bell, Tacoma

2001-04-08 Thread John Young
James Bell asks through Lou Bell, his mother: [Quote] Please send messages to the following newspapers and ask them why they haven't been following the trial of James Bell in federal court in Tacoma. There will be extremely important testimony by James Bell on Monday. He needs your help. It

AR Politics

2001-04-08 Thread John Young
(Cyberpass is down.) Jim testified for himself Friday afternoon, presenting as good a narrative as Jeff's. He's due to continue on Monday. Both Jim and Jeff made little use of exhibits, and an observer might think their testimony was scripted by a single writer: both had been well-rehearsed in

Re: Technological Solution

2001-04-29 Thread John Young
Tim May wrote: None of the non-cryptographic methods are very resistant to legal, technical, sniffing, and black bag attacks. And only multiply-chained encrypted-at-each-stage messages, a la remailers, are adequate for high-value messages. Those who've read it know that Jim Bamford's Body of

Re: RF Weapons

2001-05-03 Thread John Young
Tim May wrote: Information Warfare is again being trotted out in the context of currently-deteriorating relations between the U.S.G. and the P.R.C. (China). Wanna bet we start seeing recycled reports about plans to knock out the stock exchanges, with Chinese info-terrorists replacing the IRA

Re: Jerk with a t-shirt

2003-07-24 Thread John Young
The rights of property owners, especially commercial property, are not as absolute as sometimes argued. Due to the public services provided by governmental authorities, tax perqs not the least, property owners are required to abide a diverse range of laws and regulations to provide assurance that

Re: R.I.P. (was: Re: A 'Funky A.T.M.' Lets You Pay for Purchases Made Online)

2003-07-25 Thread John Young
Oh, like Uday and Qusay, you can't kill this immortal fucker, nobody got the guts to plow a TOW in it. Instead, thousands of gutless have hari-kiried by exiting the battle for well.com nutlick where the dead live in perfect, silent synchrony, so that is a no-brain, no-work option. Sit still,

RE: Year in Jail for Web Links

2003-08-06 Thread John Young
Mac Norton wrote: There was a weapons charge as well, which will always complicate matters considerably. There was a weapons charge -- Molotov cocktail -- in the first indictment which was dropped. The second indictment was for the single charge of distribution of information, to wit: