On 3 March 2011 10:48, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/3/3 mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com:
On 3 March 2011 07:43, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Lisandro Dalcin, 03.03.2011 05:38:
On 2 March 2011 21:01, Greg Ewinggreg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote
On 11 March 2011 01:46, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Francesc Alted fal...@pytables.org wrote:
A Tuesday 08 March 2011 18:50:15 Stefan Behnel escrigué:
mark florisson, 08.03.2011 18:00:
What I meant was that the
wrapper returned
The PyCharm IDE (http://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/) has granted the
Cython project a free Open Source license, which means that anyone
developing Cython may freely use PyCharm to develop Cython. They
prefer to license to remain unpublic, so if you develop Cython and
want a free PyCharm license,
Another feedback is that I wonder whether we should put the gil and
nogil psuedo-context managers both in cython namespace, and sort of
deprecate the global nogil, rather than introduce yet another name that
can't be used safely for all kinds of variables.
Hmm, good catch. Actually, 'with
On 16 March 2011 13:37, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 03/16/2011 12:54 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 16 March 2011 11:58, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On 03/16/2011 11:28 AM, mark florisson wrote:
I implemented the 'with gil:' statement
On 16 March 2011 15:26, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 16.03.2011 11:33:
The PyCharm IDE (http://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/) has granted the
Cython project a free Open Source license, which means that anyone
developing Cython may freely use PyCharm to develop Cython
On 16 March 2011 15:07, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 16.03.2011 13:28:
On 16 March 2011 13:01, mark florisson wrote:
Another feedback is that I wonder whether we should put the gil and
nogil psuedo-context managers both in cython namespace, and sort of
deprecate
On 16 March 2011 20:16, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
Could someone review the patch (which is attached)? Maybe check if I
haven't missed any side cases and such?
From a first look, the test file you added seems far too short. I would
expect that this feature requires a lot
On 29 March 2011 21:11, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
Running cygdb with Cython installed in the system leads to the
following problem:
vitja@vitja-laptop:~/work/cython-vitek-git/zzz$ python ../cygdb.py
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2-ubuntu
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
On 4 April 2011 13:53, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 04/04/2011 01:23 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 04.04.2011 12:17:
CEP up at http://wiki.cython.org/enhancements/prange
Variable handling
Rather than explicit declaration of shared/private
On 4 April 2011 19:18, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 04/04/2011 05:22 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 April 2011 13:53, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On 04/04/2011 01:23 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 04.04.2011 12:17
On 5 April 2011 10:34, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 05.04.2011 10:26:
On 5 April 2011 09:21, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Justification for Cython-specific syntax: This is something that is
really
only useful if you can release the GIL *outside* of the loop. So I
On 5 April 2011 10:44, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 April 2011 10:34, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 05.04.2011 10:26:
On 5 April 2011 09:21, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Justification for Cython-specific syntax: This is something
On 5 April 2011 11:01, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 05.04.2011 10:44:
On 5 April 2011 10:34, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 05.04.2011 10:26:
On 5 April 2011 09:21, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Justification for Cython-specific syntax: This is something
On 5 April 2011 12:51, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 04.04.2011 21:26:
For clarity, I'll add an example:
def f(np.ndarray[double] x, double alpha):
cdef double s = 0
cdef double tmp = 2
cdef double other = 6.6
with nogil:
for i
On 5 April 2011 14:55, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:26:34 +0200, mark florisson wrote:
[clip]
For clarity, I'll add an example:
[clip]
How about making all the special declarations explicit? The automatic
inference of variables has a problem in that a small change
On 5 April 2011 15:10, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:55:36 +, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
[clip]
# Assignment to non-private variables causes a compile-time
# error; this avoids common mistakes, such as forgetting to
# declare the
, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de
wrote:
mark florisson, 04.04.2011 21:26:
For clarity, I'll add an example:
def f(np.ndarray[double] x, double alpha):
cdef double s = 0
cdef double tmp = 2
cdef double other = 6.6
On 8 April 2011 19:59, Arthur de Souza Ribeiro
arthurdesribe...@gmail.com wrote:
The moduels suggested for the first two milestones you think are ok?
Best Regards..
[]s
Arthur
You mention the 'dis' module, but isn't that one (and 'opcode' too)
entirely written in Python?
On 11 April 2011 11:10, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 04/11/2011 10:45 AM, mark florisson wrote:
On 5 April 2011 22:29, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
I've done a pretty major revision to the prange CEP, bringing in a lot of
the feedback
On 11 April 2011 12:08, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 04/11/2011 11:41 AM, mark florisson wrote:
On 11 April 2011 11:10, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On 04/11/2011 10:45 AM, mark florisson wrote:
On 5 April 2011 22:29, Dag Sverre
Can we select tests in the tests directory selectively? I see the -T
or --ticket option, but it doens't seem to find the test tagged with #
ticket: number here.
I can select unit tests using python runtests.py
Cython.SubPackage.Tests.SomeTest, but I can't seem to do the same
thing for tests in
On 11 April 2011 12:45, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 11.04.2011 12:26:
Can we select tests in the tests directory selectively? I see the -T
or --ticket option, but it doens't seem to find the test tagged with #
ticket:number here.
I can select unit tests using
On 11 April 2011 12:53, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 April 2011 12:45, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 11.04.2011 12:26:
Can we select tests in the tests directory selectively? I see the -T
or --ticket option, but it doens't seem to find
On 13 April 2011 21:57, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 04/13/2011 09:31 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 5 April 2011 22:29, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
I've done a pretty major revision to the prange CEP, bringing in a lot of
the feedback
On 13 April 2011 22:53, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 April 2011 21:57, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On 04/13/2011 09:31 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 5 April 2011 22:29, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
I've done
On 14 April 2011 21:37, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 04/14/2011 09:08 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 14 April 2011 20:58, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On 04/14/2011 08:42 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 14 April 2011 20:29, Dag Sverre
Can I add a gilnanny to refnanny? I want to do a PyThreadState_Get()
for every refnanny inc- and decref, so that it will issue a fatal
error whenever reference counting is done without the gil, to make
sure we never do any illegal things in nogil code blocks. While I'm at
it, I also want to add a
On 18 April 2011 22:26, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:08 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I add a gilnanny to refnanny? I want to do a PyThreadState_Get()
for every refnanny inc- and decref, so that it will issue a fatal
Can I get a Hudson account so I can setup my branches there? I can't
seem to login using my trac credentials.
___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
On 19 April 2011 12:19, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 19.04.2011 11:14:
Can I get a Hudson account so I can setup my branches there?
I've created one for you. Please tell me when you have changed your
password, so that I can give you write access.
Done.
Please
On 28 April 2011 22:10, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 April 2011 21:58, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 28.04.2011 21:48:
I'm currently wondering about the proposed
cython.typeof(). I believe it currently returns a string with the type
name
On 28 April 2011 23:30, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:31 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 April 2011 22:12, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:48 PM, mark florisson
On 28 April 2011 23:59, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:29 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 April 2011 22:31, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 April 2011 22:12, Robert Bradshaw rober
On 29 April 2011 06:32, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 28.04.2011 23:29:
On 28 April 2011 22:31, mark florisson wrote:
On 28 April 2011 22:12, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Thu, Apr
On 29 April 2011 11:03, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:23:55 +0200, mark florisson wrote:
[clip]
Ok, branching on the type sounds fine to me. It brings one problem
though: because you cannot declare the variables of your variable type
(the type of say, mystruct.attrib
On 29 April 2011 12:28, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:30:19 +0200, mark florisson wrote:
On 29 April 2011 11:03, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
[clip]
Are you planning to special-case the real_t complex syntax? Shooting
from the sidelines, one more generic solution
On 29 April 2011 06:32, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 28.04.2011 23:29:
On 28 April 2011 22:31, mark florisson wrote:
On 28 April 2011 22:12, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Thu, Apr
On 3 May 2011 00:21, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:56 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 May 2011 18:24, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:38 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso
On 3 May 2011 10:07, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/03/2011 09:59 AM, mark florisson wrote:
On 3 May 2011 00:21, Robert Bradshawrober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:56 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 May 2011
On 3 May 2011 10:44, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/03/2011 10:42 AM, mark florisson wrote:
On 3 May 2011 10:07, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On 05/03/2011 09:59 AM, mark florisson wrote:
On 3 May 2011 00:21, Robert Bradshawrober
On 3 May 2011 07:47, Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
I'm a bit confused about how fused types combine to
create further fused types. If you have something
like
ctypedef struct Vector:
floating x
floating y
floating z
then is it going to generate code for all
On 3 May 2011 15:17, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 May 2011 07:47, Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
I'm a bit confused about how fused types combine to
create further fused types. If you have something
like
ctypedef struct Vector:
floating x
On 3 May 2011 18:00, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:59 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 May 2011 00:21, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:56 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso
On 4 May 2011 01:07, Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
mark florisson wrote:
cdef func(floating x, floating y):
...
you get a float, float version, and a double, double version, but
not float, double or double, float.
It's hard to draw conclusions from this example because
On 4 May 2011 10:24, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/04/2011 01:07 AM, Greg Ewing wrote:
mark florisson wrote:
cdef func(floating x, floating y):
...
you get a float, float version, and a double, double version, but
not float, double or double, float.
It's
On 21 April 2011 20:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 04/21/2011 10:37 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 7:51 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 April 2011 16:41, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote
On 4 May 2011 12:45, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/04/2011 12:00 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 21 April 2011 20:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On 04/21/2011 10:37 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 7:51 AM, mark
On 4 May 2011 13:39, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/04/2011 01:30 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:15, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On 05/04/2011 12:59 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 12:45, Dag Sverre
On 4 May 2011 13:45, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/04/2011 01:41 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:39, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On 05/04/2011 01:30 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:15, Dag Sverre
On 5 May 2011 21:52, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
There was just a messup in git history: Mark's OpenMP pull request got
merged twice; all commits show up two times.
It doesn't matter, since the two openmp branches with the same changes
merged OK, but we shouldn't
On 5 May 2011 22:22, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 05.05.2011 21:52:
There was just a messup in git history: Mark's OpenMP pull request got
merged twice; all commits show up two times.
What (I think) happened, was that Vitja pulled in Mark's changes into his
On 30 May 2011 23:31, Romain Guillebert romain...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I've posted and article on my blog that explains what I've done during
the community bonding period and the first week of the Google Summer of
Code :
On 2 June 2011 23:59, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:45 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 June 2011 23:34, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:21 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso
On 6 July 2011 10:01, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/6 Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de:
Vitja Makarov, 06.07.2011 09:05:
2011/7/6 Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de:
Stefan Behnel, 05.07.2011 10:04:
Vitja Makarov, 05.07.2011 09:17:
2011/7/5 Stefan Behnel:
Vitja
On 7 July 2011 17:09, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/6 Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com:
2011/7/6 Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de:
Vitja Makarov, 06.07.2011 09:05:
2011/7/6 Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de:
Stefan Behnel, 05.07.2011 10:04:
Vitja Makarov,
On 7 July 2011 22:15, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/7 mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com
On 6 July 2011 10:01, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/6 Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de:
Vitja Makarov, 06.07.2011 09:05:
2011/7/6 Stefan
On 7 July 2011 22:39, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/8 mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com
On 7 July 2011 22:15, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/7 mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com
On 6 July 2011 10:01, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka
On 12 July 2011 11:46, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/12 Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de
Vitja Makarov, 12.07.2011 09:46:
About cdef classes: probably it's better to
transform super().method(...) into direct form, e.g. BaseClass.method(self,
...)
Except when it
I added a test for nested parallelism with exceptions (with OpenMP
nesting explicitly enabled), however if libgomp cannot create more
threads it exits the process with exit status 1 and the message
libgomp: Thread creation failed: Resource temporarily unavailable.
This then results in a red Hudson
On 20 July 2011 11:47, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 20.07.2011 11:40:
On 20 July 2011 11:26, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 20.07.2011 10:51:
On 20 July 2011 02:32, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
We're long overdue for a release, and this week would be a good one
On 20 July 2011 18:06, Lisandro Dalcin dalc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 July 2011 20:48, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Lisandro Dalcin dalc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 July 2011 02:24, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/18
On 20 July 2011 20:04, Lisandro Dalcin dalc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 July 2011 13:51, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 July 2011 18:06, Lisandro Dalcin dalc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 July 2011 20:48, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011
On 20 July 2011 21:13, Lisandro Dalcin dalc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 July 2011 15:32, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 July 2011 20:04, Lisandro Dalcin dalc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 July 2011 13:51, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 July 2011 18:06
On 22 July 2011 04:43, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 7/21/2011 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
are not already using the latest version from the development
repository, we encourage you to try out the
On 22 July 2011 04:43, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 7/21/2011 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
are not already using the latest version from the development
repository, we encourage you to try out the
On 22 July 2011 13:31, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 07/22/2011 01:10 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 22.07.2011 12:12:
For my work on the _memview branch (and also on fused types) I noticed
that UtilityCodes started weighing heavily on me
On 22 July 2011 14:38, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 22.07.2011 13:45:
On 22 July 2011 13:10, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 22.07.2011 12:12:
For my work on the _memview branch (and also on fused types) I noticed
that UtilityCodes started weighing heavily
On 22 July 2011 15:54, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 22.07.2011 15:07:
On 22 July 2011 14:38, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 22.07.2011 13:45:
On 22 July 2011 13:10, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 22.07.2011 12:12:
For my work on the _memview
On 22 July 2011 16:31, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 22.07.2011 16:11:
On 22 July 2011 15:54, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 22.07.2011 15:07:
On 22 July 2011 14:38, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 22.07.2011 13:45:
On 22 July 2011 13:10, Stefan
On 22 July 2011 16:49, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 22.07.2011 16:13:
On 22 July 2011 16:08, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Stefan Behnel, 22.07.2011 15:54:
However, given that you always need to express metadata in some way
(e.g.
for dependencies), I don't think you can
On 22 July 2011 22:05, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:12 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
For my work on the _memview branch (and also on fused types) I noticed
that UtilityCodes started weighing heavily on me in their current
On 23 July 2011 09:37, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 22.07.2011 23:44:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:39 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 July 2011 22:05, Robert Bradshawrober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:12 AM
On 25 July 2011 12:00, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Vitja Makarov, 25.07.2011 10:25:
2011/7/25 Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de:
Vitja Makarov, 25.07.2011 08:41:
2011/7/23 Robert Bradshawrober...@math.washington.edu:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:12 AM, mark florisson
On 26 July 2011 08:46, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 26.07.2011 06:29:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:07 AM, mark florisson
It's now 'MyUtility' and
'MyUtility.proto'. If there's
On 26 July 2011 11:26, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 26.07.2011 10:57:
On 26 July 2011 08:46, Robert Bradshawrober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de
wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 26.07.2011 06:29
On 25 July 2011 08:08, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfrever@gmail.com wrote:
There are 4 NumPy-related test errors with Python 3.1 and 3.2.
Output with Python 3.2:
==
ERROR: runTest (__main__.CythonRunTestCase)
On 27 July 2011 18:46, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/27 Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de:
Hi,
quick question before raising a poll on the users mailing list.
Would anyone mind dropping support for CPython 2.3?
1) it's long out of maintenance, even the last security
On 25 July 2011 08:03, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfrever@gmail.com wrote:
There are 4 test failures with Python 2.6, 2.7, 3.1 and 3.2.
Output with Python 2.7:
==
FAIL: test_nested_break_continue (line 331)
2011/7/31 Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com:
I've tried openmp support with simple example:
from cython.parallel cimport prange
def mul(values):
ret = 1
for i in prange(values):
ret *= i
return ret
And cython crashes:
((b04e040...))
On 31 July 2011 21:49, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/31 Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com:
I've tried openmp support with simple example:
from cython.parallel cimport prange
def mul(values):
ret = 1
for i in prange(values):
ret *= i
return ret
On 3 August 2011 14:18, Francesc Alted fal...@pytables.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to take advantage of the exciting new parallelizing
capabilities recently introduced in forthcoming 0.15 version, but I'm
having a small difficulty. When I try to compile a small demo routing
(attached), I'm
Is there any specific reason objects cannot coerce to structs (from
e.g. dicts?). It would be convenient for memoryviews, then you could
assign dicts (or any mapping) to items in the memoryview from Python
space. You could also have structs as argument to def functions etc.
Any objection to this
On 3 August 2011 19:36, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 03.08.2011 16:28:
Is there any specific reason objects cannot coerce to structs (from
e.g. dicts?). It would be convenient
On 5 August 2011 08:53, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:09 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 August 2011 19:36, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan
On 5 August 2011 11:05, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 05.08.2011 08:53:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:09 PM, mark florisson wrote:
my hudson sdist keeps failing with
writing manifest file 'MANIFEST'
making hard links in Cython-0.14.1+...
hard linking COPYING.txt
On 15 August 2011 02:22, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com writes:
On 14 August 2011 17:50, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com writes:
On 12 August 2011 20:23, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote
On Monday, 15 August 2011, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 08/15/2011 11:42 AM, mark florisson wrote:
On 15 August 2011 02:22, Nikolaus Rathnikol...@rath.org wrote:
mark florissonmarkflorisso...@gmail.com writes:
On 14 August 2011 17:50, Nikolaus Rathnikol
Seljebotn, 15.08.2011 11:54: On 08/15/2011 11:42 AM, mark
florisson wrote: @Cython-dev: Do we merely want to update the docs, or do
we want to initialize the GIL for either case, or only for the with gil
functions? I'm not entirely sure what the overhead is for
single-threaded code
some tests later today
and report back.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 15.08.2011 11:54: On 08/15/2011 11:42 AM, mark
florisson wrote: @Cython-dev: Do we merely want to update the docs
On 16 August 2011 12:49, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 August 2011 11:39, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 August 2011 23:33, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
Would it be horribly expensive to generate a better runtime error
On 20 August 2011 00:34, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I think I found a rather serious bug: if an error label is used in a
nogil function, it tries to build a traceback. So if the GIL is
released you will immediately segfault, and otherwise it will work
fine! Here
On 11 September 2011 07:54, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
+1 to another release soon. Is there anything in the devel branch
that's not ready to go out? (I was also thinking of doing a release as
soon as fused functions and memory views got in.)
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at
On 11 September 2011 11:33, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 11.09.2011 07:54:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
Are we going to make a bugfix release?
There are some critical bugs in 0.15, T725 for example.
Yes, and some others.
Think we
On 16 September 2011 22:03, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 15.09.2011 22:33:
See http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.15.1 This is a bugfix only
release, we hope to get it out shortly.
I've added ticket 736 as a blocker, at least until I know what it takes to
fix
On 16 September 2011 22:29, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 16.09.2011 23:21:
On 16 September 2011 22:20, mark florisson wrote:
On 16 September 2011 22:03, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 15.09.2011 22:33:
See http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.15.1
On 23 September 2011 06:02, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/9/23 Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 23 September 2011 06:02, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/9/23 Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 29 September 2011 22:48, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:29 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 September 2011 13:13, Miguel Angel skud...@gmail.com wrote:
Structs already coerce to python dicts. In the memoryview branch
or whatever (and by casting like
int[:variable_length] mystruct.my_last_overallocated_field).
mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 September 2011 22:48, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:29 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso
1 - 100 of 411 matches
Mail list logo
