Any chance you could do the same for .darcs-temp-mail?
Attached. Currently it always deletes the file after it has been edited.
It might not be a bad idea to save the file if the sendEmailDoc fails.
I tried to implement this but it looks like I need to understand
Haskell exception handling
Oh, and a feature request -- any chance for a key that allows viewing
in the format of ``darcs send -u'' ?
Juliusz
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
* Respond better to user only hitting 'enter' in y/n questions
This doesn't compile for me. I'm sorry I don't have time to fix it
right now.
* Canonize myself and almost all other contributers.
Hope nobody actually objects to this.
Well, nobody has in over a week now, so I'll go ahead
hunk ./PatchCommute.lhs 1018
+coalesce (ChangePref p f1 t1, ChangePref p2 f2 t2) | p == p2 t2 == f1 =
Just $ ChangePref p f2 t1
Hmm... I'm not sure this doesn't break some of Darcs' determinism
properties. David, is this okay?
Juliusz
On 1/6/06, Juliusz Chroboczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what's the consensus on this one?
I feel pretty strongly about leaving Context.hs around except for
maintainer-clean. If neither of you want to create the patch, I will.
--
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer science is no more about
Taral wrote:
On 1/6/06, Juliusz Chroboczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what's the consensus on this one?
I feel pretty strongly about leaving Context.hs around except for
maintainer-clean. If neither of you want to create the patch, I will.
--
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer
So what's the consensus on this one?
I feel pretty strongly about leaving Context.hs around except for
maintainer-clean.
I'm in favour of obeying as much as possible the (somewhat baroque)
GNU conventions, as that might make work easier for packagers.
However, as I have no wish to work out
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 04:57:29PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Specifically, I'm curious if s - slurp_recorded repository in
Changes.lhs is the correct slurpy to pass in. The value isn't
actually used (with_any_selected_changes ignores the slurpy parameter)
but it probably should
I saw few mails on this list saying I just apply a patch about
However all this refer to unstable darcs repository, note the one listed on
the website (aka stable repos).
So I check on the wiki and the website, I didn't success about finding the
unstable repository url.
Is this wanted ?
Specifically, I'm curious if s - slurp_recorded repository in
Changes.lhs is the correct slurpy to pass in. The value isn't
actually used (with_any_selected_changes ignores the slurpy parameter)
I think it's on its way to allowing you to see context of patches while
you select.
Ah, okay.
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It's confusing that darcs says Shall I record this patch? when it isn't
talking about a patch, but a hunk. I'm walking a new user through darcs right
now and he stumbled on this.
--
messages: 318
nosy: droundy, tommy, zooko
status: unread
Hi all,
Here's a better patch for the darcs --exact-version context problem,
replacing my earlier patch called Save Context.hs when creating 'dist' tar
ball. Perhaps the long description is a bit too long; well, can't be bothered
to change it now.
Taral, please let me know what you think.
Fri Jan 6 21:09:10 PST 2006 Bill Trost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Make the record --pipe docs match the program behavior.
New patches:
[Make the record --pipe docs match the program behavior.
Bill Trost [EMAIL PROTECTED]**20060107050910] {
hunk ./Record.lhs 444
-the patch name, patch date and the
13 matches
Mail list logo
