Hi all,
Shall we complete the transition to the new bug tracker, or at least
inch closer to that goal? We could do this in a minimalistic fashion
by
1. merging redundant tickets
2. resolving
- old tickets (resolved == resolved-in-unstable?)
- tickets that complain about RT
-
NT-based versions of Windows should support '', which includes
Windows 2000. I would guess that it doesn't work under Win9x, but
have no way to test.
I've finally tried this redirection syntax in Windows 98. The
redirection doesn't work
Okay, thanks for the info. Could the
To make it easier for those who want to help reviewing
patches on the mailing list, I additionally recommend the
use of --unified with darcs send.
--
Tommy Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
Hello,
I was looking a issue80 and I discovered that Repository.writePatch
reads the freshly written patch. This is a very expensive operation
given the current patch format. So I started to wonder why it does
that.
This took me to DarcsRepo.write_patch which led me to
Hmm..Sending this with darcs send --unified prevented darcs from
letting me add a description (a setting which is set in my global
darcs prefs).
What I wanted to say is, I'm sending the patch for the email I just
commented on. I tested the this change with the testsuite and
everything
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 06:57:17PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
+To use \verb!p4merge!, you would use
+\begin{verbatim}
+--external-merge 'p4merge %a %1 %2 %o'
David, is that okay with you? It amounts to advertising for proprietary
software.
I'm fine with this. Given that the
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 04:24:16AM -0800, Jason Dagit wrote:
I was looking a issue80 and I discovered that Repository.writePatch
reads the freshly written patch. This is a very expensive operation
given the current patch format. So I started to wonder why it does
that.
To avoid the
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 02:13:33PM +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
darcs record -a ought to be a constant space operation.
When recording new files, that is.
If some exist it'll probably be O(f(largest files size)) for some
function f determined by the diff algorithm.
Thanks
Ian
This is the only part that will appear in some UIs (notably web
interfaces). It should be short, to the point, and understandable by
itself. ``fixes for testsuite'' is okay, ``fix for issue79'' and
``Issue14 addendum'' are not.
This doesn't make sense to me. fix for issue79 is more useful
David Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 06:57:17PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
+To use \verb!p4merge!, you would use
+\begin{verbatim}
+--external-merge 'p4merge %a %1 %2 %o'
David, is that okay with you? It amounts to advertising for
proprietary software.
Sorry, I forgot that there were new patches in darcs-unstable. My
previous patch fails with a conflict. Attached is a newer version
that should work with the current repository.
--
Zachary P. Landau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
save-email-description-file-if-a-send-fails.dpatch
Description: Binary data
Hello,
I decided to go ahead and implement the --logfile and --delete-logfile
support for send, as mentioned in my previous email. The first patch
is just a resend of the one in that same previous email.
Because these patches use a file for an email and not for a long
description, I also am
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:12:40PM -0500, Zachary P. Landau wrote:
Sat Jan 14 17:06:52 EST 2006 Zachary P. Landau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Update tests to use --logfile instead of --file
Without commenting on the change of option names, I think
this patch name says the reverse of what's intended.
Sat Jan 14 23:57:32 CET 2006 Eric Kow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* add a --diff-command flag
Sat Jan 14 23:59:01 CET 2006 Eric Kow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* refactor Resolution.run to use CommandLine.parseCmd
Sun Jan 15 00:00:20 CET 2006 Eric Kow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* remove spurious '.' in doc
New
Sat Jan 14 17:58:32 EST 2006 Zachary P. Landau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add support to make_email for optional headers
Sat Jan 14 18:28:26 EST 2006 Zachary P. Landau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add --in-reply-to option to send command.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
New patches:
[Add
Hi,
I realized while working on another patch that get_fileopt should
really be in DarcsArguments.lhs and be named get_file, to be
consistent with other options (like subject/get_subject) for example.
Attached at the same patches but with an extra one to move this
function. Sorry for not
On Jan 14, 2006, at 12:22 PM, Jason Dagit wrote:
On Jan 14, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 04:24:16AM -0800, Jason Dagit wrote:
I was looking a issue80 and I discovered that Repository.writePatch
reads the freshly written patch. This is a very expensive
17 matches
Mail list logo
