Re: [darcs-users] conflict misery....

2005-12-31 Thread Tommy Pettersson
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 09:40:49PM -0800, Mark Lentczner wrote: [*1] [5b] cd ~/base/product cvs update -r Branch_Bar darcs record darcs tag cd ~/working/product darcs pull While this is a big operation, (several hundred files changed), nothing I was

Re: [darcs-users] problem with darcs push over ssh

2005-12-31 Thread Tommy Pettersson
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 09:52:28PM -0600, mike wrote: I'm trying to push some changes to another machine on my local network using ssh. Pull works fine over ssh and prompts me for my password several times. But pushit asks me about each patch individually and I say yes to each one,

Re: [darcs-users] conflict misery....

2005-12-31 Thread Eric Kow
Hello, I don't have tricks for speedy and fast. But maybe a slight methodology tweak will be helpful. On 31 déc. 05, at 06:40, Mark Lentczner wrote: This generally works just fine - even if I commit the sin of not recording some outstanding changes in working first. === Questions on

Re: [darcs-users] RFC: Third-party applications directory

2005-12-31 Thread Pedro Melo
Hi, On Dec 31, 2005, at 12:13 AM, Alberto Bertogli wrote: I wanted to request for comments about the directory used for third- party applications, like darcsweb. I've just applied a patch to support automatic repository description, which uses the file _darcs/third_party/darcsweb/desc to

[darcs-users] changing an author

2005-12-31 Thread Clive Crous
a patch was sent to me (unified diff) by a 3rd party once-off contributer. I applied it to my repository with the author set to that author's email. I have since been contacted and asked to remove the email address from 'public display', that is: he want's his email removed from the patch within

Re: [darcs-users] conflict misery....

2005-12-31 Thread Albert Reiner
[Eric Kow [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:29:45 +0100]: Question for darcs community: would it be useful for darcs to enforce local records before pulling/applying? It'd be much like the way CVS enforces updating before committing, only backwards. Plus we could have a --unrecorded-ok

Re: [darcs-users] RFC: Third-party applications directory

2005-12-31 Thread Alberto Bertogli
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 11:37:48AM +, Pedro Melo wrote: I've just applied a patch to support automatic repository description, which uses the file _darcs/third_party/darcsweb/desc to obtain it, instead of hardcoding it inside darcsweb's configuration. +1... My darcs2rss (in dire need

Re: [darcs-users] RFC: Third-party applications directory

2005-12-31 Thread Jonathon Mah
While in this case the file itself is not important, I wanted to comment on the directory choice, _darcs/third_party/darcsweb/. It was chosen following David Roundy's suggestion in this mail: http://www.abridgegame.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2005-November/ 008745.html. Tom Counsell and I are