I'm getting weird behavior with darcs whatsnew.
In multiple repos, darcs whatsnew has suddenly decided it *must* report adds.
Once this starts, the command will ignore the --dont-look-for-adds option and
I've been unable to cause these repos to revert back to their normal whatsnew
behavior.
On 9/14/06, Scott Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This differs from the boring file how?
Good question - I should have made this distinction apparant in my
first mail. The boring file cannot be used on files that darcs is
already keeping track of. The ignore file can. You could think of
the
On 9/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting weird behavior with darcs whatsnew.
In multiple repos, darcs whatsnew has suddenly decided it *must* report adds.
Do you have anything in _darcs/patches/pending?
Jason
___
Eric,
I will not use this functionality myself, I think tand hat the
submitter is using the wrong tool for the job (he wants to use
Unison). Before making a decision, please take into account the
following points:
1. As Zachary pointed out, ignore/unignore are too good command names
to use
what's about --include --exclude syntax as in find or rsync ?
Excellent point. Then the functionality of the patch can be
implemented by putting
ALL exclude=changing-file
in the prefs file.
Juliusz
___
On 9/14/06, Juliusz Chroboczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will not use this functionality myself, I think tand hat the
submitter is using the wrong tool for the job (he wants to use
Unison).
I disagree. I perfectly saw his point here, and I absolutely don't
think it is Unison that would solve
I should have thought to grep _darcs! The files are listed in pending as
{
addfile ...
___
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
Max Battcher wrote:
On 9/14/06, Juliusz Chroboczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will not use this functionality myself, I think tand hat the
submitter is using the wrong tool for the job (he wants to use
Unison).
I disagree.
I agree with you on this point (even if I understood Juliusz
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:27:33AM -0700, Jason Dagit wrote:
It should be safe to remove those from the pending file.
On a side note, I feel like I've seen enough emails that prescribe
delete it from pending that I think we need to change this some how.
Seems like too many people are getting
Odd. My message got truncated somehow. The following is what I'd
intended to send and what's in my sent folder:
I should have thought to grep _darcs! The files are listed in pending as
{
addfile ...
.
.
}
I see that if I darcs record -l and specify n for addfile, that
they get
added to
10 matches
Mail list logo
