Florent Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le 30 sept. 08 à 23:30, Eric Kow a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 22:27:24 +0100, Eric Kow wrote:
Fast-tracking.
On second thought, you have some haddock errors (nothing which
prevents
haddocking). Would you like to submit a cleaned-up version?
It's partial, but I believe the most important part are there. Is the
--^ syntax ok? I feel it does add clarity where I have used it.
Florent
Wed Oct 1 10:13:15 CEST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* haddock documentation for Hopefully
New patches:
[haddock documentation for Hopefully
[EMAIL
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 10:28:02 +0200, Florent Becker wrote:
This yields a question: do we want the C(x y) to appear in the
api-doc. They don't appear in the automatically-generated parts of the
html, but they do appear in the code, so there has to be a discrepancy
somewhere.
Hmm, I think
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 10:31:06 +0200, Florent Becker wrote:
It's partial, but I believe the most important part are there. Is the
--^ syntax ok? I feel it does add clarity where I have used it.
Did you send the wrong bundle?
In a previous message, David said that he would prefer avoiding the
Hi,
just a short note: I've updated Solaris/x86 buildbot to GHC 6.8.3 and
also installed maybench as Eric requested in the past.
Cheers,
Karel
___
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 11:22:21 +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
just a short note: I've updated Solaris/x86 buildbot to GHC 6.8.3 and
also installed maybench as Eric requested in the past.
Thanks! Once darcs 2.1 is released, I hope to have a little bit more time
to look at the performance
Eric Kow a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 10:28:02 +0200, Florent Becker wrote:
This yields a question: do we want the C(x y) to appear in the
api-doc. They don't appear in the automatically-generated parts of the
html, but they do appear in the code, so there has to be a discrepancy
Eric Kow a écrit :
By the way, why not use darcs send?
If it's just not working for you, we may have an interesting use case of
darcs send not being good enough. Both you and zooko being affected by
this must surely be a bad sign.
I don't use darcs send for three reasons:
-1/ I'm a lazy
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 11:35:57 +0200, Florent Becker wrote:
I was documenting a type application, so it _is_ code you would find in
the source.
Doh! My apologies.
I shouldn't be doing this with half-attention, sorry.
I wrote 'Hopefully p C(x y)' is equivalent to 'Either String (p C(x
Eric Kow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 10:31:06 +0200, Florent Becker wrote:
It's partial, but I believe the most important part are there. Is the
--^ syntax ok? I feel it does add clarity where I have used it.
Did you send the wrong bundle?
Oops, it looks like I did.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:10:32PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's possible that the inverse of issue1110 fails too, get
--old-fashioned of a hashed repository.
Maybe this is interaction between the command line
defaults and the stored preferences?
Or I might just be tired/mistaken
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 10:28:02AM +0200, Florent Becker wrote:
Florent Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le 30 sept. 08 à 23:30, Eric Kow a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 22:27:24 +0100, Eric Kow wrote:
Fast-tracking.
On second thought, you have some haddock errors (nothing which
Hi all (and especially Dmitry),
In reviewing the first patch in this bundle, I found a bug, for which
I wrote a test (that passes before the fix) and a fix. Review would
be appreciated.
David
Mon Sep 29 10:19:48 EDT 2008 Dmitry Kurochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Resolve issue1105: check if
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 06:38:00PM +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
Hello.
Attached is fix for issue1105 and test. I am not very happy with it.
IMHO code became more complex. Suggestions how to make it better or
fix the bug another way are welcomed.
Hmmm. This code doesn't look so bad to me.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:45 AM, Florent Becker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Kow a écrit :
By the way, why not use darcs send?
If it's just not working for you, we may have an interesting use case of
darcs send not being good enough. Both you and zooko being affected by
this must surely be
Wed Oct 1 22:18:38 CEST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* fixed accidental merge of two lines in default boring
New patches:
[fixed accidental merge of two lines in default boring
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hunk ./src/Darcs/Repository/Prefs.lhs 134
\\.p_hi$, \\.p_o$, -- profiling Haskell
16 matches
Mail list logo
