Am 08.09.20 um 21:47 schrieb James Cook:
In your case, for two adjacent /sequences/ A;B, and equivalences A~A',
B~B', we need to have that A;B commutes iff A';B' commutes. Now, suppose
you have patches a;b;b^;c, where none of the adjacent pairs commute.
You'd have to show that t
> >> In your case, for two adjacent /sequences/ A;B, and equivalences A~A',
> >> B~B', we need to have that A;B commutes iff A';B' commutes. Now, suppose
> >> you have patches a;b;b^;c, where none of the adjacent pairs commute.
> >> You'd have to show that this implies that a;c commutes neither (ta
Am 08.09.20 um 17:29 schrieb James Cook:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 14:24, Ben Franksen wrote:
>>
> If I wanted to implement it, I think it would just become this:
>
> * A repository consists of two things:
> * A sequence S of primitive patches with distinct names, starting at
>
On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 14:24, Ben Franksen wrote:
>
> >>> If I wanted to implement it, I think it would just become this:
> >>>
> >>> * A repository consists of two things:
> >>> * A sequence S of primitive patches with distinct names, starting at
> >>> O, with no inverses (i.e. only positive nam