Re: [darcs-users] How to extend a patch theory to fully commute

2020-09-08 Thread James Cook
On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 14:24, Ben Franksen wrote: > > >>> If I wanted to implement it, I think it would just become this: > >>> > >>> * A repository consists of two things: > >>> * A sequence S of primitive patches with distinct names, starting at > >>> O, with no inverses (i.e. only positive

Re: [darcs-users] How to extend a patch theory to fully commute

2020-09-08 Thread Ben Franksen
Am 08.09.20 um 17:29 schrieb James Cook: > On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 14:24, Ben Franksen wrote: >> > If I wanted to implement it, I think it would just become this: > > * A repository consists of two things: > * A sequence S of primitive patches with distinct names, starting at

Re: [darcs-users] How to extend a patch theory to fully commute

2020-09-08 Thread Ben Franksen
Am 08.09.20 um 21:47 schrieb James Cook: In your case, for two adjacent /sequences/ A;B, and equivalences A~A', B~B', we need to have that A;B commutes iff A';B' commutes. Now, suppose you have patches a;b;b^;c, where none of the adjacent pairs commute. You'd have to show that

Re: [darcs-users] How to extend a patch theory to fully commute

2020-09-08 Thread James Cook
> >> In your case, for two adjacent /sequences/ A;B, and equivalences A~A', > >> B~B', we need to have that A;B commutes iff A';B' commutes. Now, suppose > >> you have patches a;b;b^;c, where none of the adjacent pairs commute. > >> You'd have to show that this implies that a;c commutes neither