[darktable-dev] Re: DT 2.2.3 much faster than 2.2.1 !!

Am 17.02.2017 um 06:57 schrieb Matthias Bodenbinder: > Am 16.02.2017 um 23:27 schrieb Tobias Ellinghaus: > >> Neither module was changed between those two releases. Did you compile both >> versions yourself and are you sure that the compile flags are identical? >> >>> Good job! Thank you! >>>

[darktable-dev] Re: DT 2.2.3 much faster than 2.2.1 !!

Am 16.02.2017 um 23:27 schrieb Tobias Ellinghaus: > Neither module was changed between those two releases. Did you compile both > versions yourself and are you sure that the compile flags are identical? > >> Good job! Thank you! >> >> Matthias > I compiled 2.2.3 myself and took 2.2.1 from

[darktable-dev] determining global image features in the pixelpipe

Hi, as I recently mentioned I am working on an automatic haze removal module for darktable. Adopting the useless module I added a new module to the correction group and placed this new module into an appropriate place in the pixel pipe. The only missing part is the actual implementation of

Re: [darktable-dev] DT 2.2.3 much faster than 2.2.1 !!

Am Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2017, 22:04:37 CET schrieb Matthias Bodenbinder: > Hi, > > since I have a new CPU and mainboard I did a lot of benchmarking. What I am > basically doing is executing > > darktable-cli bench.SRW test.jpg --core -d perf -d opencl > > I got bench.SRW and bench.SRW.xmp

[darktable-dev] DT 2.2.3 much faster than 2.2.1 !!

Hi, since I have a new CPU and mainboard I did a lot of benchmarking. What I am basically doing is executing darktable-cli bench.SRW test.jpg --core -d perf -d opencl I got bench.SRW and bench.SRW.xmp somewhere from a darktable group. Anyhow, I am comparing the DT processing times shown in

Re: [darktable-dev] darktable 2.2.3 crashes on selection of add path

Am 16.02.2017 um 10:17 schrieb Michael Figiel: If this works it implies that this code is called with nb == 0, meaning a path with no nodes. Which is strange. I've rebuilt darktable with the line patched and the problem went away, the paths are usable. Thank you! To be sure, I built dt without

Re: [darktable-dev] export to google photo

Roman, > That reads to me as if we should just completely drop picasa exporter Not really, I'm using it :) And as long as it is possible to upload pictures it is good enough. --   Pascal Obry /  Magny Les Hameaux (78)   The best way to travel is by means of imagination   http://www.obry.net

Re: [darktable-dev] export to google photo

Le jeudi 16 février 2017 à 19:21 +0100, Holger Klemm a écrit : > Hi, > Hidrive is also a nice cloud solution for images. > With european privacy (German server)! > > Here the example: > https://sharegallery.strato.com/pages/demo-album-eng#my-amazing-famil > y-1/ > photos/grid > > Here the API: >

Re: [darktable-dev] export to google photo

Hi, Hidrive is also a nice cloud solution for images. With european privacy (German server)! Here the example: https://sharegallery.strato.com/pages/demo-album-eng#my-amazing-family-1/ photos/grid Here the API: https://dev.strato.com/hidrive/ Am Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2017, 19:10:35 CET

Re: [darktable-dev] export to google photo

Roman, > Is there any kind of announcement i wonder? No. Did not see any announce. > In facebook case, IIRC they only disabled album creation for old API, > but it is still possible with the new API version. In case of Google Photo the documentation says that it is removed on old version of

Re: [darktable-dev] export to google photo

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Pascal Obry wrote: > > A follow-up on this issue. I think the different transient issues we > had week ago was due to Google deprecating part of the API. Lot of > changes have been made! > > As of today it is not possible to create album from the

Re: [darktable-dev] export to google photo

A follow-up on this issue. I think the different transient issues we had week ago was due to Google deprecating part of the API. Lot of changes have been made! As of today it is not possible to create album from the API. That is the darktable export to Google Photo will always fail. It is the

Re: Re: [darktable-dev] Darktable on Beignet

Thanks for your tips. I will try it. yan.wang From: Roman Lebedev Date: 2017-02-16 19:37 To: yan.wang CC: darktable-dev Subject: Re: [darktable-dev] Darktable on Beignet On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:11 AM, yan.wang wrote: > Hi, > I am Beignet devloper from Intel.

Re: [darktable-dev] Darktable on Beignet

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:11 AM, yan.wang wrote: > Hi, > I am Beignet devloper from Intel. Hi. > Just I found Beignet is pushed into the blacklist of darktable because > of one bug. > http://www.darktable.org/2016/12/darktable-2-2-0rc3-released/ > I

[darktable-dev] Darktable on Beignet

Hi, I am Beignet devloper from Intel. Just I found Beignet is pushed into the blacklist of darktable because of one bug. http://www.darktable.org/2016/12/darktable-2-2-0rc3-released/ I want to fix it but I don't know how to reproduce it. Who could help me? Thanks.