Le samedi 31 janvier 2015 à 12:13 -0800, David Vincent-Jones a écrit :
> Interestingly this is the same problem that I had some years ago when I tried
> to use 'Photoprint'.
Was this fixed at some point?
> It appears that it prints correctly in the portrait mode but fails
> when
> printing in
I probably spoke too soon regarding the fix for my HP printer.
It appears that it prints correctly in the portrait mode but fails when
printing in landscape mode. The same image (landscape shape) fails in
landscape mode but is fine printing to portrait.
This is an older HP Photosmart-Pro-B8800
Am 31.01.2015 um 17:21 schrieb Roman Lebedev:
>> All my pictures are pale in version 1.7. Even when it is just green trees
> and brown soil. It does not seem to be restricted to blue/purple.
> The XMP you have attached references ICC's:
> [colorin] could not find requested profile `canon-6d-97-382-
>All my pictures are pale in version 1.7. Even when it is just green trees
and brown soil. It does not seem to be restricted to blue/purple.
The XMP you have attached references ICC's:
[colorin] could not find requested profile `canon-6d-97-382-wb.icc'!
[colorout] could not find requested display p
Am 31.01.2015 um 12:05 schrieb johannes hanika:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Matthias Bodenbinder <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Am 31.01.2015 um 11:11 schrieb Roman Lebedev:
By the way, when I run 1.6.1 and 1.7 in parallel I see that the pictures
>>> in 1.7 have less satura
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Matthias Bodenbinder <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 31.01.2015 um 11:11 schrieb Roman Lebedev:
> >> By the way, when I run 1.6.1 and 1.7 in parallel I see that the pictures
> > in 1.7 have less saturation. They look pale. The same is true for the
> > resu
Am 31.01.2015 um 11:11 schrieb Roman Lebedev:
>> By the way, when I run 1.6.1 and 1.7 in parallel I see that the pictures
> in 1.7 have less saturation. They look pale. The same is true for the
> resulting JPGs.
> See this screenshot: JPGs from version 1.6.1 (left) and 1.7 (right) with
> same xmp
>By the way, when I run 1.6.1 and 1.7 in parallel I see that the pictures
in 1.7 have less saturation. They look pale. The same is true for the
resulting JPGs.
See this screenshot: JPGs from version 1.6.1 (left) and 1.7 (right) with
same xmp file.
Interesting..
Would you mind attaching that raw +
Yesterday I wanted to use the tethering module from darktable and found
out that setting the f-number was freezing darktable.
After lot of investigation I found this to be a gphoto2 issue in version
2.5.4 (GNU/Debian). After upgrading to 2.5.7 all is working again.
This message is just to avoid
Why are you people consider maillists as write-only? Have you even tried
looking for recent mails here with the same symptoms?
http://www.darktable.org/redmine/issues/10297
+ at least 2 mails from me with same content:
(change the paths, if needed):
rm -rf /opt/darktable ~/darktable/build
Roman.
Did you try to delete your darktable directory and the build directory.
Am 31.01.2015, 08:12 Uhr, schrieb Matthias Bodenbinder
:
> Hi,
>
> when I use DT 1.7 all my thumbnails and pictures are displayed pure
> white without any color. I deleted .config/darktable and imported some
> pictures
11 matches
Mail list logo
