[darktable-devel] trying to build with colord support

2013-11-24 Thread Madko
Hi, I'm trying to build darktable 1.2.3 with colord support to make a new RPM package for Fedora as it has been asked on our bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033899 However the build fails on these errors: cd /builddir/build/BUILD/darktable-1.2.3/buildFedora/src/dtview && /us

Re: [darktable-devel] Redhat Enterprise Linux Nogo, Fedora 19 lua restriction (was: DT doesn't build on RHEL+Co due to Glib version too old)

2013-09-03 Thread Madko
I can ask the lua fedora packager for an upgrade. What for lua is needed? 2013/9/3 jeremy rosen > and for the love of god, get your distro to package lua 5.2, it has been > released in 2011 > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:09 PM, jeremy rosen < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> yes, I

Re: [darktable-devel] concerns about security and incompatible license

2013-06-10 Thread Madko
The problem about squish is that some (at least Fedora/RH) thinks that distributing patented sources is as harmful as distributing the compiled version... Debian's point of view is that source code is like free speech (at least in the US), and it's just a description of the invention, not the inven

Re: [darktable-devel] concerns about security and incompatible license

2013-06-10 Thread Madko
perfect :) 2013/6/10 johannes hanika > oh, i only pushed to master, now in darktable-1.2.x, too. > > -jo > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Madko wrote: > >> Thank you Johannes for this clear explaination about libraw. So the best >> solution would be to

Re: [darktable-devel] concerns about security and incompatible license

2013-06-10 Thread Madko
is around, compilation > will be fine and a linked binary will just crash at runtime (or do random > stuff). > > -jo > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Madko wrote: > >> Do you know why they removed those functionnalities? >> >> >> 2013/6/10 joha

Re: [darktable-devel] concerns about security and incompatible license

2013-06-10 Thread Madko
Do you know why they removed those functionnalities? 2013/6/10 johannes hanika > no, not possible. we need to revert a couple of commits from upsteam to > get back functionality that has been removed over the years. > > -jo > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Mad

Re: [darktable-devel] concerns about security and incompatible license

2013-06-10 Thread Madko
Is it possible to build darktable against LibRaw from the system, not against the one provided in src/external? 2013/6/10 Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Madko wrote: > > Thanks Johannes > > > > about squish and its patented algorithm

Re: [darktable-devel] concerns about security and incompatible license

2013-06-10 Thread Madko
LibRaw is suffering from a security issue >> >> not the version we use, ours is too old. >> >> >- osm-gps-map is GPL v2, so not compatible with GPLv3+ >> >> no idea about that, you can compile without if you don't like it. >> >> j. >> >&

[darktable-devel] concerns about security and incompatible license

2013-06-10 Thread Madko
Hi, please can someone look at this bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972604 and tell me if you agree with the reporter (specially the license problem). Thanks -- Edouard Bourguignon -- How ServiceN

[darktable-devel] Fwd: problems with 1.2

2013-04-25 Thread Madko
I find out that I need to remove my ~/.config/darktable after upgrading to 1.2 or else I have the problems mentionned below. is it normal? -- Forwarded message -- From: Madko Date: 2013/4/6 Subject: problems with 1.2 To: Darktable-users Hi, I'm trying 1.2 (before packagi

Re: [darktable-devel] Release of 1.1.4

2013-03-15 Thread Madko
Yes updates are a feature in most linux distro. Btw 1.1.4 is available thru updates-testing repository on fedora 18 Le 15 mars 2013 18:47, "Colin Adams" a écrit : > On 15 March 2013 17:36, Pascal de Bruijn wrote: > > > > > Darktable 1.1.4 has been released btw :) > > I have 1.1.3 installed via y

Re: [darktable-devel] Darktable 1.1.3 (potentially)

2013-02-07 Thread Madko
2013/2/7 johannes hanika > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Madko wrote: > > Thanks Pascal and Klaus for this quick workaround. In fact fedora 19 is > > using libjpeg-turbo, in what looks like a pre version from the project > svn > > (1.2.90-0.1.20130204svn922). So it

Re: [darktable-devel] Darktable 1.1.3 (potentially)

2013-02-06 Thread Madko
anks again! 2013/2/6 Pascal de Bruijn > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Madko wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this commit for pre1.1.3 fails to build at least on fedora 19: > > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2085/4932085/build.log > > If you want to have a

Re: [darktable-devel] Darktable 1.1.3 (potentially)

2013-02-06 Thread Madko
Hi, this commit for pre1.1.3 fails to build at least on fedora 19: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2085/4932085/build.log If you want to have a look 2013/2/1 Pascal de Bruijn > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Togan Muftuoglu > wrote: > > On 02/01/2013 08:17 PM, Pascal de Bruijn