Re: [darktable-devel] LIbraw 16.1 Beta

2013-12-06 Thread johannes hanika
sorry i completely fail to see the connection now. if you'd rather use whatever different software it's your choice. to get an idea what is required to get good support for a particular camera model, please: - assume libraw has nothing to do with it at all - read http://www.darktable.org/2012/10/

Re: [darktable-devel] LIbraw 16.1 Beta

2013-12-06 Thread johannes hanika
noise removal is totally unrelated to libraw. and `sometimes reads' is a little too fuzzy for me to derive anything from it. whatever the issue is there, i doubt it'll be solved by new libraw (which is only used in case rawspeed doesn't load it). j. On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:51 PM, steve wrote:

Re: [darktable-devel] LIbraw 16.1 Beta

2013-12-05 Thread steve
In comparison to the E-M5, which dt supports flawlessly, E-M1 raw files are often read inconsistently. I shoot RAW+JPEG. When I import often only JPEGs are read, sometimes a few RAW files also get read. Noise reduction works poorly on E-M1 files. Non Local noise reduction does not eliminate noi

Re: [darktable-devel] LIbraw 16.1 Beta

2013-12-05 Thread johannes hanika
what do you mean, not well supported? if we can load them at all, a new libraw wouldn't change anything. newer libraw has a changed api, i meant to port our code to that some time ago but didn't get around. i wouldn't feel comfortable changing it now. for 1.4. -j. On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:53 AM

[darktable-devel] LIbraw 16.1 Beta

2013-12-05 Thread steve
Is it possible that darktable could use the newest Libraw 16.1 Beta in version 1.4? The latest version contains camera support for the Olympus E-M1 as well as many others and these cameras are note well supported in the existing RC1 version of 1.4. thanks, Steve