Re: [darktable-user] Print tab absent

2016-10-25 Thread Marek Vančo
On 25.10.2016 03:07, Normand Fortier wrote: I'm using the stable binary for Archlinux (64 bit). Since the darktable manual describes printing, I assumed it should be available in the stable branch. You mean it's possible that the archlinux package would have been built without print

Practically, what was the problem fixed in 2.0.7? (Re: [darktable-user] PSA: ATTENTION NIKON OWNERS !!!)

2016-10-25 Thread Stéphane Gourichon
Hello, darktable 2.0.7 was announced today with this: Base Support (fixes, was broken in 2.0.6, apologies for inconvenience) Le 07/10/2016 à 15:00, Roman Lebedev a écrit : As you may have seen, an issue with white level for some nikon cameras (or so i thought) was discovered by me:

[darktable-user] darktable 2.0.7 released

2016-10-25 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
we're proud to announce the seventh bugfix release for the 2.0 series of darktable, 2.0.7! the github release is here: https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/ releases/tag/release-2.0.7. as always, please don't use the autogenerated tarball provided by github, but only our tar.xz. the

Re: [darktable-user] Merging multiple images

2016-10-25 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
Am Montag, 24. Oktober 2016, 17:07:24 CEST schrieb darkta...@911networks.com: > DT 2.0.6 on archlinux. > > I'd like to do some light painting and would like to merge the > multiple images into 1. > > I have about 20 images on tripod and each image has a different > section that is lit (by led).

Re: [darktable-user] Merging multiple images

2016-10-25 Thread Maurizio Paglia
Il 25 ott 2016 02:08, ha scritto: > DT 2.0.6 on archlinux. > > I'd like to do some light painting and would like to merge the > multiple images into 1. > > I have about 20 images on tripod and each image has a different > section that is lit (by led). In photoshop, it

Re: [darktable-user] Print tab absent

2016-10-25 Thread Pascal Obry
Hi Normand, > I'm using the stable binary for Archlinux (64 bit). Since the > darktable  > manual describes printing, I assumed it should be available in the  > stable branch. You mean it's possible that the archlinux package > would have been built without print capability? Most probably yes,