On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 16:40:39 -0800
"I. Ivanov" wrote:
>It is good that it works for you (one way or another). I usually
>export @95% and it seems to work well quality vs size. But perhaps
>you have reasons to compress further I didn't try higher
>compressions.
Try webpages with:
https://dev
It is good that it works for you (one way or another). I usually export
@95% and it seems to work well quality vs size. But perhaps you have
reasons to compress further I didn't try higher compressions.
Regards,
B
On 2017-01-18 02:36 PM, darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:19:35 -0800
"I. Ivanov" wrote:
>No I didn't... but the images were @100%. I just wanted to point out
>that the viewer can influence the perception. Based on what I have
>seen I believe DT is working as expected. The way how the other
>viewers render the image however can va
No I didn't... but the images were @100%. I just wanted to point out
that the viewer can influence the perception. Based on what I have seen
I believe DT is working as expected. The way how the other viewers
render the image however can vary significantly. But it is not really a
DT issue. Never
You can get the full mail list here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/darktable-user@lists.darktable.org/maillist.html
Regards,
Guillermo
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:22 PM Michael wrote:
> Could someone repost the last two messages prior to this one posted with
> this subject I accidently clicked
Thank you,
Issue #11465 created.
I did consider to use "local copy" feature and in the future likely it
will be like that. Currently however - it works better as it is now
(because it takes me a big amount of time to finish some folders with
images).
Regards,
B
On 2017-01-18 03:01 AM, jo
On mercredi 18 janvier 2017 14:35:36 CET KOVÁCS István wrote:
> > What I changed was the export profile from sRGB to Adobe RGB (compatible).
>
> And that is the cause of your problems. Compared to sRGB, Adobe RGB
> uses a different gamma, which makes your images darker when viewed
> using a non-co
> What I changed was the export profile from sRGB to Adobe RGB (compatible).
And that is the cause of your problems. Compared to sRGB, Adobe RGB
uses a different gamma, which makes your images darker when viewed
using a non-colour-managed viewer; it also has a wider gamut, which
makes colours more
btw.. you know that you could probably always keep your images on the
NAS and use the `local copy' feature to get localised raw images if
it's just about the network file access speed?
-jo
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 17. Januar 2017, 15:21:12 CET sch
Am Dienstag, 17. Januar 2017, 15:21:12 CET schrieb I. Ivanov:
> On 2017-01-17 02:59 PM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 17. Januar 2017, 12:20:52 CET schrieb I. Ivanov:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> bojo@cheetah:~$ echo "select max(id) from images" | sqlite3
> >> ~/.config/darktable/library.d
10 matches
Mail list logo
