Can you post the .CR2 file for that picture? I saw the .CR2 that you
posted earlier, but it was a different image; the roses weren't pure red
like these.
On 01/31/2018 01:56 PM, Diego Queres wrote:
See the pictures:
Am Mittwoch, 31. Januar 2018, 19:31:29 CET schrieb Sergii Dymchenko:
> For me having disabled modules in history is very useful, because the
> modules may have some non-default parameters set, and later I may want to
> re-enable them.
> For example, I can apply the watermark module, change some
For me having disabled modules in history is very useful, because the
modules may have some non-default parameters set, and later I may want to
re-enable them.
For example, I can apply the watermark module, change some colors/position,
export with the watermark.
Later I can disable the watermark
Hi,
I don't understand why the history stack still contains - or generally
should contain - disabled modules after stack compression.
I have seen the procedure for cleaning up deselected modules, but it
seems to me to be very complex, especially for multiple deselected
modules within the same
When I open the CR2 it pretty much looks like the JPG you provided. So I can
not reproduce your issue.
Which basecurve is applied in your DT?
Matthias
Am 31.01.2018 um 16:31 schrieb Diego Queres:
> Hi!
>
> I liked Darktable a lot. I'm learning a lot from it, to edit my last photos
> and I
Hi!
I liked Darktable a lot. I'm learning a lot from it, to edit my last photos
and I learned a lot.
But i having a problem with DARKTABLE: It seems that when I put an photo to
edit the first time, it darkens the photo, photo appear have more noise,
I think DARKTABLE makes some pre-edits of "
