On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 06:40 +0200, Reto wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 03:42:55PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > PLEASE post large files/images to a file sharing service rather
> > than send
> > them to everyone on the list, many who may not be interested and
> > other who
> > may be on
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 03:42:55PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> PLEASE post large files/images to a file sharing service rather than send
> them to everyone on the list, many who may not be interested and other who
> may be on measured service and you drive up their cost.
It's 164 KB... not
On 13/05/2019 07:06, mick crane wrote:
> windows there's
> https://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/ exiftools
> http://u88.n24.queensu.ca/~bogdan/ GUI for exiftools
>
> linux looks like exiv2 will do it.
There's a lot of artificially generated umbrage here.
The UNIX principle of "each
* Bernhard [05-13-19 15:00]:
>
>
> Bernhard schrieb am 13.05.19 um 17:27:
> >
> >
> > mick crane schrieb am 13.05.19 um 13:06:
> > > windows there's
> > > https://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/ exiftools
> > > http://u88.n24.queensu.ca/~bogdan/ GUI for exiftools
> > >
> > > linux
I did not know that, but you wrote 'open source; so I could gave guested
that :)
Just watched a video and it is quite impressing. although I still think
it is too much for what I need. I have my folders well organized, so I
don't really need such software.
And there still is the fact that I
ResourceSpace can be used on a local basis without cost it is full open
source.
On 2019-05-13 11:58 a.m., Kneops wrote:
I did not know ResourceSpace, but have you seen their prices?
Currently I'm using Photodeck and busy to edit/export/upload all my
photos.
If only DT would...
I did not know ResourceSpace, but have you seen their prices?
Currently I'm using Photodeck and busy to edit/export/upload all my photos.
If only DT would...
https://www.jacktummers.com/
Op 13-05-19 om 20:37 schreef David Vincent-Jones:
Possibly one solution could be the integrated
Possibly one solution could be the integrated export/import to a
dedicated open source DAM like ResourceSpace.
This would allow personal modifications by the user to suit all needs.
On 2019-05-13 11:00 a.m., Remco Viëtor wrote:
On lundi 13 mai 2019 18:35:07 CEST Kneops wrote:
I noticed DK is
On lundi 13 mai 2019 18:35:07 CEST Kneops wrote:
> I noticed DK is using exiv2 and offers (way too) many XMP fields. A lot
> of them are perhaps nice for museums and such, a photographer needs only
> a small number.
Probably correct, but the exact fields needed can vary. Personally, I have no
I noticed DK is using exiv2 and offers (way too) many XMP fields. A lot
of them are perhaps nice for museums and such, a photographer needs only
a small number. A friend who already works for a news paper uses LR and
one default field is Job identifier, so the administration knows where
to
You're right Bernhard, it seems that XMP is going to replace IPTC and
some XMP fields already 'translate' some of these IPTC fields into the
new standard, which is XMP.
Op 13-05-19 om 17:55 schreef Bernhard:
That said it would be more interesting to add more of the xmp-fields
for a more
Hi guys,
I'm really going to try and find a way to use both DT and DK, but the
workflow is not pleasant and, like Lorenzo says, can lead to unnecessary
back and forth between programs.
I just did a test and opened a previously in DT edited folder with
images in DK. The first thing I notice
This is very nice in theory and in some situations it works too. But in
many others it's just a mess.
Let's suppose I have 2000+ pictures, I rate them, tag and process them with
DT. Now I'm done and I export 300 jpeg files. Now I start digikam or
something else, import the exported files and add
hi,
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:43 AM wrote:
>
> tl;dr: If it can be done with 3rd party software, you should like it.
>
> Hi, sorry, I cannot solve your problem, since I do almost no metadata
> editing. But I'd like to comment on one important misconception:
>
> Kneops (2019-May-13, excerpt):
>
On 5/13/19 5:34 AM, dt-l...@stefan-klinger.de wrote:
> tl;dr: If it can be done with 3rd party software, you should like it.
>
> Hi, sorry, I cannot solve your problem, since I do almost no metadata
> editing. But I'd like to comment on one important misconception:
>
> Kneops (2019-May-13,
Thanks to Coding Dave. I chose to make AppData visible because there
are other items there that I back up regularly, like Firefox and
Thunderbird profiles. In any case, it's a good thing to have
alternatives. Thanks again.
Willy
On
You can just enter %localappdata%\darktable into
* the explorer,
* the start search field,
* the START+R dialog
* or other input fields as long as they are not browsing the internet
and the correct folder is being opened. No need to do any visibility
changes
Am Mo., 13. Mai 2019 um 14:51 Uhr
Thanks for the input. I have found it there.
It's best to go into File Explorer as Mick suggested, click on Show
hidden files, folders, and drives, then find
C:\Users\[UserName]\AppData. Right-click on AppData, go to Properties,
then on the General tab, click on Hidden to clear it. Then go
windows there's
https://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/ exiftools
http://u88.n24.queensu.ca/~bogdan/ GUI for exiftools
linux looks like exiv2 will do it.
mick
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
darktable user mailing
tl;dr: If it can be done with 3rd party software, you should like it.
Hi, sorry, I cannot solve your problem, since I do almost no metadata
editing. But I'd like to comment on one important misconception:
Kneops (2019-May-13, excerpt):
> I really would like to be able to do this in one program
On lundi 13 mai 2019 08:54:28 CEST Kneops wrote:
> Hi HaJo. Aside from that I really would like to be able to do this in
> one program (DT), how does this work? I have never been really able to
> add metadata in DK (just can't get it to work), but if I get it to work,
> are the meta fields then
Hi HaJo. Aside from that I really would like to be able to do this in
one program (DT), how does this work? I have never been really able to
add metadata in DK (just can't get it to work), but if I get it to work,
are the meta fields then visible in DT? You see, I could then add
metadata in DK
I'm using both DT and DK on Linux and don't import/export. Both programs
have access to the folder structure that holds my photos and tagging in one
program is seamlessly picked up by the other. I use sidecars for RAW
images, obviously.
--
Sent from my mobile device, apologies for typos
PGP key:
... should be something like
|C:\Users\[username]\AppData\Local\darktable\ - just copy all content
from there to a safe place -
|according to https://www.darktable.org/about/faq/
--
regards
Bernhard
https://www.bilddateien.de
August Schwerdfeger schrieb am 13.05.19 um 02:43:
On Linux and
I asked this before and there are a number of replies about this. See
below. Unfortunately it seems that almost no one wants or needs this???
Imho it is so basic to photography and DAM.
It's the most important part in DT that I and is now forcing me to buy a
second computer with Windows and a
25 matches
Mail list logo
