* Top Rock Photography [01-29-21 21:14]:
> My only demand is that the lawyer gets on the phone and speak to the AOM
> people. It has been almost one year! IANAL….
>
> …But I have read the AOM license,, and I have studied the case of Nokia vs
> the other members of AOM, and HEIF. In that case,
My only demand is that the lawyer gets on the phone and speak to the AOM
people. It has been almost one year! IANAL….
…But I have read the AOM license,, and I have studied the case of Nokia vs
the other members of AOM, and HEIF. In that case, all the other lawyers
claim that a) Nokia never held a
Why don’t you take over the responsibility for the project? And be fully
accountable for a possible copyright or patent infringement?
It is presumptuous to demand something from others that you are not willing to
contribute yourself.
> Am 29.01.2021 um 20:11 schrieb Top Rock Photography
> :
>
Several tools in ubuntu —GNU/Linux in general— use those fields, but they
may not show by default. Also, as Patrick said, (piwigo ….and most other)
web albums can and do use those fields. Again, maybe not showing them by
default.
When doing a workshop, using the style option in the export module
My only concern is that, although AVIF is not patent encumbered, he refused
to add the reading/writing of metadata data to AVIF, until he speaks to a
lawyer. That has been quite a long time ago and so, my AVIF files made by
darktable seem to have no metadata.
Currently, Exiftool is no better (in
